Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:31
Registered on:3/19/2026
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Air Orgerons
Bayou Jordans
Nike Boudreauxs
Nike Thibodauxs

That's all
Forget her birthday and ask why dinner isn't ready when you get home...be a man.
Having a good home schedule and having an easy schedule are two very different things. Arguably 3 of our 4 toughest games are at home, which is helpful... but at the end of the day there is no such thing as an easy SEC schedule.
This dude has the self-awareness of a fricking pinecone. If anything, the outrage would be much bigger along with the consequences. LSU lives in the crosshairs.

Believe it or not, LSU isn't the only school with money.

Some of y'all have no clue how bidding works and it's become evident.
This is not excusable by any stretch.

I remember when most people on here understood the decision to remove Tyrann Mathieu from the team. They didn't like it, but they had a grasp of the concept of accountability. If you think about it now, that offense is significantly less severe than the one Sorsby is being accused of.

If he's willing to bet against his own team... then what's stopping him from shaving points? That's not something I think anyone on this board would excuse.

There's a reason that other programs are reacting how they are. The integrity of the sport has been jeopardized. Anyone defending this on Tech's side is out of line. There is no defense. End of discussion.
quote:

Jay got 2 yes but that doesnt make him a better coach than those mentioned


So, aside from championships, what makes a great coach? And what do those others mentioned do better than JJ?

This is not argumentative; I just want to see what your metrics for a good coach are.
No, you're not allowed to say this. The only reason we failed this season is because we didn't have enough NIL money to be good.
It's never a good day to lose a tiger fan like your father. He sounds like a great man. Prayers to you and your loved ones.
quote:

Wrong. We had less money, so we couldn't get as many good players.

Less money than who exactly?

quote:

Based on what? Did it look like the second best portal haul in baseball?

Based on On3. You're proving my point that we missed on evaluation here. It did not look like the second best portal haul....that's the point.

quote:

Just looking at the meaningless list, it fails to include the biggest spender in the portal in Georgia Tech.

Oh boy lol. Jason Varitek drops a bag and all of a sudden they're the biggest spender in college baseball. One bad season really has y'all seeing ghosts huh?

Based on a lot of the logic (or lack thereof) I see on this board, we should be getting any and every player we want all the time. That's not how the free market works. Even the Yankees "lose" in free agency when they decide to stop bidding.
We missed on players, not because of money, but because of evaluation. It has zero to do with NIL dollars or the willingness for our donors to spend them. We had the second best portal haul in college baseball last year, and one that fans were raving about all off season.

But AI is free so here's what it has to say:

The programs most often mentioned as the top NIL spenders in NCAA baseball are:

LSU Tigers baseball
Texas A&M Aggies baseball
Tennessee Volunteers baseball
Arkansas Razorbacks baseball
Texas Longhorns baseball
Florida Gators baseball
Ole Miss Rebels baseball
Wake Forest Demon Deacons baseball
Oregon Ducks baseball
Vanderbilt Commodores baseball

The biggest baseball-specific NIL powers right now are probably:

LSU Tigers baseball
Texas A&M Aggies baseball
Tennessee Volunteers baseball
Arkansas Razorbacks baseball
Oh boy, here come the "we need more NIL money" fans to bang their drums, and claim LSU is falling behind.
Wade is using this as an opportunity to stick the NCAA's face in the mess they made with NIL/Portal. As well he should, they're the reason his first stint with LSU was cut short. Now he sees that the NCAA doesn't have the power that they portray (see Trinidad Chambliss), so he's gonna take advantage of it. Not only that, but he's in a situation where he can't lose. Best case scenario, he gets a stellar roster. Worst case scenario he makes the NCAA spend a shite ton of money in litigation cleaning up their own mess.

Why the hate? Because the coach is Will Wade and the school is LSU. Same reason Dickie V wanted Wade banished, but made exceptions for his buddies Pitino, Self, Calipari, Boeheim, etc. Wade and LSU being good at basketball went against his status quo. He defended the other because they are his idea of "blue bloods". In his feeble old mind, there's no room at the top for newcomers.
My sources tell me Jay is working on a shift that defends the walk better...

All jokes aside the shift is just a numbers game that is mostly played with pull hitters, or batter tendencies against LHP vs RHP. Really just using statistics and metrics to try to put guys in the right position to make plays. It's not a perfect science, but most coaches would say it's helped more than it's hurt them.

To answer your question though it's much more based on the hitter than it is the pitcher and hitting spots.
quote:

With the limited financial resources


Enough of this. This is just not true. Stop acting like we're losing games because we don't have enough money.
Or maybe, just hear me out, Jay was able to recruit first round talent...like... you know ...most successful coaches do.

Not sure the last coach to win it all with a bad team. What an idiotic argument.
I always think the mentality behind building a roster is to rely on development out of high school, and them supplement through the portal. Obviously, there are some exceptions when guys like Tommy White, Paul Skenes, Jacob Berry, etc. enter the portal you go out and get em regardless.

This season was sort of a perfect storm of bad luck. Your pitching staff is not what you thought, Moore injury, portal additions didn't live up to the hype, Brown done for season, and a lot of failure in the development department as well.
Yeah, the "on paper" is a big one. Guys can scream it's not pay for play until they're blue in the face, but suppose a 5-star steps on campus and either doesn't pan out, doesn't play, etc. He's certainly not going to see as much money that next year as he otherwise would have if he were to perform well.

So, while it's not exactly pay to play. Play certainly dictates pay, though it may be delayed.

OP is gonna get dragged, but the question really isn't that bad.
quote:

I bet you hated it when they made dribbling legal in basketball and the forward pass legal in football too


And I bet you hated watching Paul Skenes pitch on Friday nights. Oh boy such an educated comparison. Just admit you're too shallow to understand the details of the sport and we can move on.

quote:

Damn leagues shilling for offense like always


And somehow views have gone up tremendously since the introduction of the BBCOR bat. Really throws a wrench in this entire more runs = more views argument.
Y'all speak of this as if defense is the only side of the ball that can be penalized in football. False starts, holding, illegal shift, ineligible player downfield, OPI, etc.

Baseball is not a contact sport, football is. There are a lot of similarities before the ball is snapped/hit after that is where my comparison ends because that's when the sports are no longer similar.

Just say you wanna see more hits and runs because it makes baseball more fun to watch and that'll tell everyone what they probably already know.
Which part? Or is it just all wrong? Care to provide a counter argument...that's usually how this works?