- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:30 am to STLhog
quote:
Should have named him Jaxson
You meant Jaxsyn right?
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:30 am to ghoast
Spare me, you're the soccer version of a progrssive liberal. You got beat up on the playground as a kid and latched onto soccer because it was "alternative".
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:31 am to BCLA
Ok man.
Keep telling yourself this team isn’t a bunch of little video game soy kids. And I don’t blame them. Just the times etc.
It’d be one thing to lose 2-1 due to a moment of brilliance.
We just got schooled on 3 of the easiest goals in the WC and are crying after.
Keep telling yourself this team isn’t a bunch of little video game soy kids. And I don’t blame them. Just the times etc.
It’d be one thing to lose 2-1 due to a moment of brilliance.
We just got schooled on 3 of the easiest goals in the WC and are crying after.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:31 am to bad93ex
Lol.
Braxtyn*
Braxtyn*
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:31 am to tigerfan88
quote:
The Dutch did not dominate that game. They were just clinical. A couple of shots from the top of the box go a yard left or right and they don’t score.
Then you do not understand the sport and clearly never coached or are not a good one. Teams with better control, playing a counter attack strategy against a weaker team is common and they played it perfectly outside of the first 10 minutes.
They let the US waste energy and challenged a weak back 4 with the counterattack. Further, yes the US got some chances and lucked into a goal off a fluke deflection (nice play but still luck). But outside of that they did very little.
Again, the talent on the US team is mediocre because it is a bunch of country club kids whose parents basically paid for their opportunity to be in the training.
This is why soccer will never improve until that corrupt system is scrapped.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:32 am to STLhog
We also had 2 or 3 goals cleared off the line by a Dutch defender. Kind of crazy when you think about it.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:34 am to BlackCoffeeKid
Not goals if they don’t go in
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:35 am to The Boat
quote:
Our soccer players were better when they played soccer because they wanted to. Not because their lib parents and all their gay friends were playing and made them play.
You’re a special kind of stupid. The Poliboard is probably for you.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:35 am to STLhog
quote:
Not goals if they don’t go in
Obviously.
But what I'm saying is this match had the potential to have a wildly different outcome. The US held their own, mental lapses and a few bounced just didn't go their way.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:35 am to AllDayEveryDay
LOL. Did you just revert to politics because you can’t back up your knowledge of a game you’re shite posting about?
That’s awesome. LOL.
Keep it up.
That’s awesome. LOL.
Keep it up.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:36 am to Geauxgurt
The talent is far from mediocre and the best it’s been.
We have a dude setting the team up like it’s 2002 and a 2002 mentality.
That is the much bigger problem.
We have a dude setting the team up like it’s 2002 and a 2002 mentality.
That is the much bigger problem.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:37 am to BlackCoffeeKid
Bounces didn’t go our way?
The only reason we had a goal is because we got lucky AF on a bounce..
The only reason we had a goal is because we got lucky AF on a bounce..
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:39 am to AllDayEveryDay
Dude I’m sorry I’ve made you so mad. I apologize. Seriously. LOL.
Edit: I love you’ve gone back and read my posts. Maybe you’ll learn something.
Edit: I love you’ve gone back and read my posts. Maybe you’ll learn something.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 11:50 am
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:53 am to STLhog
quote:
Pulisic still has a little bit of chip in his shoulder bitch vibe. Like Donovan.
It’s because they’re both short and have/had to always do extra to prove themselves.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:57 am to ghoast
That's entirely based on your "superior knowledge" in the game thread. I could go through your post history but I wouldn't learn anything new, so why bother 
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:02 pm to AllDayEveryDay
Be my guest big boy.
You’ll find some interesting information that you’ll find useful. You’re welcome.
You’ll find some interesting information that you’ll find useful. You’re welcome.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:03 pm to STLhog
quote:
The talent is far from mediocre
False
quote:
the best it’s been.
True
It’s still not good enough to win this kind of game unless you can score on set pieces and defend a lot better than what was shown today.
We aren’t changing the way the world views American soccer, which is a retarded goal anyway.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:11 pm to Earnest_P
Can we just roll out our best 53 college football players in a game in to make me feel better? 
Side note: Just need Bryce Young at QB
Side note: Just need Bryce Young at QB
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 12/4/22 at 7:35 am to Alyosha
quote:
It’s not the starters I’m concerned with
Welp I was wrong
Page 51 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News