- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Manchester United 2023/24 Season Long Thread —Glazers OUT
Posted on 11/4/23 at 7:43 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 11/4/23 at 7:43 am to StraightCashHomey21
lol VAR
0
Posted on 11/4/23 at 7:43 am to tigerfan24736
That is an absolute joke of an offside decision. frick var.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 7:59 am to Broyota2
It was harsh, but I can understand the logic behind it being that he attempted to play the ball and interfered with the nearest defender.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 7:59 am to Broyota2
I actually agree with it. Maguire was involved in the play because the backside defender came to him freeing up Garnacho.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:07 am to Dawgsontop34
Do you not remember our goal vs city last year Rashford running for the ball offside dragging the defenders with him. Him not touching the ball. He interfered with play tremendously and that goal was given? The inconsistency with var is dumb as frick that’s my biggest gripe.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:11 am to Broyota2
So was this decision a joke like you said? Or are you saying that Rashford’s should have also been disallowed?
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:21 am to BlackCoffeeKid
Yes it’s a joke if it’s clearly being given as a goal in other situations across the league.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:23 am to Broyota2
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
You’re pretty much saying that even though they got a previous decision wrong, they should also incorrectly rule this one for the sake of being consistent.
You’re pretty much saying that even though they got a previous decision wrong, they should also incorrectly rule this one for the sake of being consistent.
This post was edited on 11/4/23 at 8:26 am
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:47 am to BlackCoffeeKid
No if it’s clearly not a set rule how can one be right and the other be wrong? Like it said on the broadcast it’s subjective and I personally think thats bullshite. It should be a clear black and white obvious call/ruling.
It lets in way to much room for inconsistent calls and errors which ruins the experience.
It lets in way to much room for inconsistent calls and errors which ruins the experience.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:50 am to BlackCoffeeKid
Eriksen needs to go away
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:51 am to Broyota2
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/4/23 at 9:00 am
Posted on 11/4/23 at 8:57 am to BlackCoffeeKid
Antony is terrible
He’s given the ball away about 8 times
He’s given the ball away about 8 times
Posted on 11/4/23 at 9:13 am to StraightCashHomey21
Oh Mason…
Posted on 11/4/23 at 9:29 am to StraightCashHomey21
Pellestri is so clear of Anthony it’s not even up for debate.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 9:32 am to Dawgsontop34
He actually put effort in though
Posted on 11/4/23 at 9:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
Great win!
Posted on 11/4/23 at 9:52 am to StraightCashHomey21
State of Var trying to keep McSauce from his ballon d’or
Posted on 11/8/23 at 5:12 pm to S
Can United simply forfeit the rest of the season? This is pathetic.
Posted on 11/8/23 at 5:13 pm to 3rdRowTailgater
We were actually playing damn good until that bullshite Red card
Posted on 11/9/23 at 2:22 am to Icceytiger
Yup and if the ref goes to the monitor it always gets overturned whatever it is. Idk what the point of it is if the decision is already made. But nonetheless if that happens shite 10 years ago and the ref catches it it’s a yellow.
Page 20 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News