- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
First soccer tactical formations you remember playing?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:25 pm
Around the age where I was old enough to actually understand and play real positions in tactical formations on the field (between 8 and 9 I think) my team played a 3-1-4-2. In reality it was more of a 3-5-2 with the center mid playing more of a defensive “sweeper” role. Generally the fastest players with the strongest legs played outside mid (we called it halfback).
Generally by the time I got older (H.S. age) we mostly played 4-3-3 or something like that.
What are the earliest formations you remember playing and did they work?
Generally by the time I got older (H.S. age) we mostly played 4-3-3 or something like that.
What are the earliest formations you remember playing and did they work?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:28 pm to NOLALGD
I think when we were 8/9 we only played with 9 on the field so it was 3-3-2
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:29 pm to NOLALGD
quote:
3-5-2 with the center mid playing more of a defensive “sweeper” role.
If you stated this correctly, that is an awful tactical move. I assume you mean he was more of a stopper rather than sweeper.
In club we always played the traditional 4-4-2 with the flat midfield or diamond. In HS we ran a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 hybrid
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:29 pm to NOLALGD
mainly played a 4-3-3 in lower levels with our center mid playing a "rover" style position that had free reign of the entire field.
One of my club teams I remember playing a diamond d specifically so I guess a 1-2-1-4-2 style or something weird like that. I never paid much attention to be honest...If I wasn't a center forward I was in goal. Never had to worry much about the rest of the formation
One of my club teams I remember playing a diamond d specifically so I guess a 1-2-1-4-2 style or something weird like that. I never paid much attention to be honest...If I wasn't a center forward I was in goal. Never had to worry much about the rest of the formation
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:30 pm to NOLALGD
We played three in the back with a sweeper in front of the defenders. The sweeper was usually the second best player. Then we had three midfielders, who were usually the worst players on the team. Then we had two wingers and a center forward, who was kind of a target man. He was the best player on the team.
It was a weird line-up, but we had a very knowledgeable coach who played semi-pro and was in excellent shape and could kill us all in a playing situation. He also rarely yelled.
We won almost all of our games, including those against far more athletic teams.
ETA: So I guess a 3-1-3-3
Haven't seen it on the international stage yet. Maybe Steve Samson will give it a look.
It was a weird line-up, but we had a very knowledgeable coach who played semi-pro and was in excellent shape and could kill us all in a playing situation. He also rarely yelled.
We won almost all of our games, including those against far more athletic teams.
ETA: So I guess a 3-1-3-3
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:33 pm to NOLALGD
Played 4-4-2 in rec from 10-12 and then again when I made the move to premier at 13. At 15 I went from striker to center mid and for the first time ever my team played a flat back 4 rather than having a "stopper". Was probably the most difficult transition I've ever been through in any sport.
ETA: I guess the stopper actually made it a 3-1-4-2. So that until 15 and then the move to 4-4-2.
ETA: I guess the stopper actually made it a 3-1-4-2. So that until 15 and then the move to 4-4-2.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:33 pm to NOLALGD
9-1, with the fastest kid up top. whoever gets it kicks it to him. i think we were called the ninja turtles and we won the league in 1990.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:34 pm to Keys Open Doors
Yes, that was exactly it. The most skilled overall player was the target forward and the sweeper was always a fast kid who could cover a lot of ground. And yes now it seems a little odd but we won a lot and beat some equally and more talented teams.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:26 pm to NOLALGD
quote:
Generally by the time I got older (H.S. age) we mostly played 4-3-3 or something like that.
I can see you have that great soccer IQ that so many soccer fans claim to have that the general public doesn't.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:40 pm to NOLALGD
Umm, I can't really remember, but probably a 4-4-2
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:44 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
I can see you have that great soccer IQ that so many soccer fans claim to have that the general public doesn't.
By saying that, most of us realize he means they used a 4-3-3, or a mutation of that. No need to list 4-2-3-1, 4-1-2-3, and every other slight variation.
Also, high school used a 4-4-2 with a flat midfield except senior year when we went to a 3-4-3. Club tended to use a 4-3-3 for the most part. The 3-4-3 was actually my favorite to play in as a keeper.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:02 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
We played three in the back with a sweeper in front of the defenders.
Second person in this thread to say this. Sweeper is behind the backline. Stopper is in front of the backline.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:09 pm to NOLALGD
I think the best way to allow minimal goals up through high school is with a sweeper. I really do. Someone who can just roam around with a big leg and tons of speed, picking up anyone who slips through. With a solid offsides trap, this can kill teams.
I grew up playing sweeper. My club team had the same back 4 for 7 years. We were deadly.
The best defense I ever saw was at my high school the year after I graduated.
We had an All-State keeper playing sweeper. He was an all-american at sweeper, and the guy in goal was very solid - plays college. The sweeper played enough games at keeper to be named All-State at two positions.
They basically didn't allow goals. Team lost on a shootout after a 0-0 draw in the state championship when the opposing team never came close to scoring.
I grew up playing sweeper. My club team had the same back 4 for 7 years. We were deadly.
The best defense I ever saw was at my high school the year after I graduated.
We had an All-State keeper playing sweeper. He was an all-american at sweeper, and the guy in goal was very solid - plays college. The sweeper played enough games at keeper to be named All-State at two positions.
They basically didn't allow goals. Team lost on a shootout after a 0-0 draw in the state championship when the opposing team never came close to scoring.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:18 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:We ran this when I was on JV. I was one of the two marking backs most of the time. Occasionally played sweeper. We won a lot more than we lost.
I think the best way to allow minimal goals up through high school is with a sweeper. I really do. Someone who can just roam around with a big leg and tons of speed, picking up anyone who slips through. With a solid offsides trap, this can kill teams.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:34 pm to pvilleguru
3-1-2-4 was basically what we played. The outside wingers/forwards would get back at times but mainly they offense only. generally one of the strikers would play more of the #10 role with the other sitting on the backline. so maybe it was really a 3-1-2-3-1
we scored alot. had a fast athletic back three that were almost interchangeable at the three spots. It was a blast to run
we scored alot. had a fast athletic back three that were almost interchangeable at the three spots. It was a blast to run
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:39 pm to petar
4-4-2 with stopper & sweeper (so, diamond in the back, essentially).
Popular
Back to top
10











