Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

First soccer tactical formations you remember playing?

Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:25 pm
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2797 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:25 pm
Around the age where I was old enough to actually understand and play real positions in tactical formations on the field (between 8 and 9 I think) my team played a 3-1-4-2. In reality it was more of a 3-5-2 with the center mid playing more of a defensive “sweeper” role. Generally the fastest players with the strongest legs played outside mid (we called it halfback).

Generally by the time I got older (H.S. age) we mostly played 4-3-3 or something like that.

What are the earliest formations you remember playing and did they work?
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:28 pm to
I think when we were 8/9 we only played with 9 on the field so it was 3-3-2
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19543 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

3-5-2 with the center mid playing more of a defensive “sweeper” role.


If you stated this correctly, that is an awful tactical move. I assume you mean he was more of a stopper rather than sweeper.

In club we always played the traditional 4-4-2 with the flat midfield or diamond. In HS we ran a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 hybrid
Posted by Doldil
The Ham
Member since Jan 2010
6214 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:29 pm to
mainly played a 4-3-3 in lower levels with our center mid playing a "rover" style position that had free reign of the entire field.

One of my club teams I remember playing a diamond d specifically so I guess a 1-2-1-4-2 style or something weird like that. I never paid much attention to be honest...If I wasn't a center forward I was in goal. Never had to worry much about the rest of the formation
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
33034 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:30 pm to
We played three in the back with a sweeper in front of the defenders. The sweeper was usually the second best player. Then we had three midfielders, who were usually the worst players on the team. Then we had two wingers and a center forward, who was kind of a target man. He was the best player on the team.

It was a weird line-up, but we had a very knowledgeable coach who played semi-pro and was in excellent shape and could kill us all in a playing situation. He also rarely yelled.

We won almost all of our games, including those against far more athletic teams.

ETA: So I guess a 3-1-3-3 Haven't seen it on the international stage yet. Maybe Steve Samson will give it a look.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:34 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52678 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:33 pm to
Played 4-4-2 in rec from 10-12 and then again when I made the move to premier at 13. At 15 I went from striker to center mid and for the first time ever my team played a flat back 4 rather than having a "stopper". Was probably the most difficult transition I've ever been through in any sport.

ETA: I guess the stopper actually made it a 3-1-4-2. So that until 15 and then the move to 4-4-2.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10861 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:33 pm to
9-1, with the fastest kid up top. whoever gets it kicks it to him. i think we were called the ninja turtles and we won the league in 1990.
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2797 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:34 pm to
Yes, that was exactly it. The most skilled overall player was the target forward and the sweeper was always a fast kid who could cover a lot of ground. And yes now it seems a little odd but we won a lot and beat some equally and more talented teams.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:39 pm to
Flat 4-4-2
Posted by fightingtigers98
Member since Oct 2011
13307 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:15 pm to
4-4-2
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
20172 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Generally by the time I got older (H.S. age) we mostly played 4-3-3 or something like that.

I can see you have that great soccer IQ that so many soccer fans claim to have that the general public doesn't.
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:40 pm to
Umm, I can't really remember, but probably a 4-4-2
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

I can see you have that great soccer IQ that so many soccer fans claim to have that the general public doesn't.


By saying that, most of us realize he means they used a 4-3-3, or a mutation of that. No need to list 4-2-3-1, 4-1-2-3, and every other slight variation.

Also, high school used a 4-4-2 with a flat midfield except senior year when we went to a 3-4-3. Club tended to use a 4-3-3 for the most part. The 3-4-3 was actually my favorite to play in as a keeper.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 5:56 pm
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27539 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

We played three in the back with a sweeper in front of the defenders.


Second person in this thread to say this. Sweeper is behind the backline. Stopper is in front of the backline.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27539 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:09 pm to
I think the best way to allow minimal goals up through high school is with a sweeper. I really do. Someone who can just roam around with a big leg and tons of speed, picking up anyone who slips through. With a solid offsides trap, this can kill teams.

I grew up playing sweeper. My club team had the same back 4 for 7 years. We were deadly.

The best defense I ever saw was at my high school the year after I graduated.

We had an All-State keeper playing sweeper. He was an all-american at sweeper, and the guy in goal was very solid - plays college. The sweeper played enough games at keeper to be named All-State at two positions.

They basically didn't allow goals. Team lost on a shootout after a 0-0 draw in the state championship when the opposing team never came close to scoring.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

I think the best way to allow minimal goals up through high school is with a sweeper. I really do. Someone who can just roam around with a big leg and tons of speed, picking up anyone who slips through. With a solid offsides trap, this can kill teams.
We ran this when I was on JV. I was one of the two marking backs most of the time. Occasionally played sweeper. We won a lot more than we lost.
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:34 pm to
3-1-2-4 was basically what we played. The outside wingers/forwards would get back at times but mainly they offense only. generally one of the strikers would play more of the #10 role with the other sitting on the backline. so maybe it was really a 3-1-2-3-1

we scored alot. had a fast athletic back three that were almost interchangeable at the three spots. It was a blast to run
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19699 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:39 pm to
4-4-2 with stopper & sweeper (so, diamond in the back, essentially).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram