- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FIFA allows Belgian FA to appeal Balogun’s suspended suspension
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:10 am to The Pirate King
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:10 am to The Pirate King
Yea them crying about this when they did no such crying over Ronaldo is just typical Belgium behavior
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:12 am to Big4SALTbro
They'll probably make a decision on Tuesday. If US is out, it won't matter.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:13 am to Clockwatcher68
I’ve seen fish out of the water flop less than this
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:14 am to Big4SALTbro
what was the reasoning given for why ronaldo's suspension was delayed, I never really looked into it.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:37 am to bbap
"we cannot have one of ths faces of international soccer miss the group stages"
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:37 am to bbap
His 2nd and 3rd bans were suspended. Ronaldo already missed one game in qualifying for the red card. Their gripe is that Balogun will have missed zero via a rule that is entirely subjective on FIFA’s part.
We’d be pissed too if we were in a foreign World Cup and a red card was reversed after a call from the host country’s president.
But I do agree Belgium should stop whining. They look even worse because of it.
We’d be pissed too if we were in a foreign World Cup and a red card was reversed after a call from the host country’s president.
But I do agree Belgium should stop whining. They look even worse because of it.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:42 am to MetArl15
quote:
We’d be pissed too if we were in a foreign World Cup and a red card was reversed after a call from the host country’s president.
Who is we? Because I don't think I'd be that pissed, especially under the circumstances of it being a bad call, which is subjective of course so ok, but also improper usage of review, which is not at all subjective.
There really is zero controversy, or at least, there shouldn't be.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:46 am to bbap
Yea I wouldn’t be pissed at all if this was in reverse and Luka or whatever his name for Belgium got a red card based on illegal use of VAR and then it got over turned. I wouldn’t be pissed even if they made up a rule on the fly which they didn’t.
It’s just anti American cry baby bullshite because our country is better than them. They should be grateful because they don’t exist without us. At least they don’t exist as an independent nation without us.
It’s just anti American cry baby bullshite because our country is better than them. They should be grateful because they don’t exist without us. At least they don’t exist as an independent nation without us.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:50 am to Big4SALTbro
It shows we have come a long way in soccer, win or lose tonight, that Europe is throwing a fricking fit over little ole USA getting proper justice over a terrible decision and terrible application of that decision.
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 8:51 am
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:52 am to bbap
If it was a bad call after an improper review, the remedy is to get rid of the red card and sentence to time served with the 30 minutes of 10 man soccer.
They didn’t do that. They suspended the sentence to favor the host country after a call from the president. It is FIFA 101 corruption and it stinks.
That said, screw it, I hope we still destroy the Belgians and people are pissed the rest of the tournament.
They didn’t do that. They suspended the sentence to favor the host country after a call from the president. It is FIFA 101 corruption and it stinks.
That said, screw it, I hope we still destroy the Belgians and people are pissed the rest of the tournament.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:54 am to bbap
We have grown up for sure in how much of a threat we have started to become to the European powers.
It will only get worse for them as our athletes go over and get more time in their systems and our home systems keep improving to produce players that can compete in Europe.
It will only get worse for them as our athletes go over and get more time in their systems and our home systems keep improving to produce players that can compete in Europe.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:55 am to MetArl15
quote:
They suspended the sentence to favor the host country after a call from the president.
There's zero proof of this. Not saying the call didn't happen, but that it had any affect on the review process. It was black and white procedural errors, phone call or no phone call. The correct decision was made.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:57 am to bbap
quote:Everything in this sentence is true.
They suspended the sentence to favor the host country after a call from the president.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:57 am to bbap
Hasn't FIFA already used this same rule this world cup in allowing Otamendi and Caicedo to play?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:59 am to MetArl15
quote:
They suspended the sentence to favor the host country after a call from the president.
Everything in this sentence is true.
Unfortunately, saying it over and over doesn't make it true.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:59 am to TideCPA
So let me get this straight. The US has no way to appeal the red card, but Belgium can appeal this?
And this isn't corruption?
And this isn't corruption?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:01 am to bbap
The suspended sentence happened after a call from the president and it favored the host nation.
There is no way for any of us to link it causally. But everything is true.
There is no way for any of us to link it causally. But everything is true.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:03 am to MetArl15
quote:
The suspended sentence happened after a call from the president and it favored the host nation.
not what you said. you said they suspended the sentence TO favor the host country. you have no proof of this.
maybe they just made the right decision BECAUSE it was the right decision.
Popular
Back to top


3




