- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘You’re going to see something in Georgia on voter fraud’ — Trump discusses Fulton County
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:28 am to Flats
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:28 am to Flats
quote:
but it's not going to change an election. Organized, deliberate fraud in specific pressure points can.
It doesn't really matter if it would have made a difference in the outcome because the outcome can't be reversed, and that was true about 2-3 days after the election. I guess it could be a positive in that it would get peoples' attention more, but keeping this from happening again is what I think is important. And I think it's important whether the election outcome was impacted or not.
in the past 5 years, I have devoted pages & pages of prose and failed to approach the clarity of your above post.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:31 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
And Georgia and Arizona IMO are the likeliest suspects for that to have happened on a state level based on the changes in total votes cast between 2016 and 2020.
You can throw Wisconsin in there. There’s more numbers evidence of fraud in 2020 Wisconsin than in Georgia.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:32 am to loogaroo
I live in GA and I can't imagine this happening under my watch so probably nothing happening here.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:36 am to the808bass
quote:
And Georgia and Arizona IMO are the likeliest suspects for that to have happened on a state level based on the changes in total votes cast between 2016 and 2020.
You can throw Wisconsin in there. There’s more numbers evidence of fraud in 2020 Wisconsin than in Georgia.
One thing that was generally common in these various swing state precincts, where the Democratic Socialists miraculously pulled off early morning comebacks in the 2020 GE was voter participation. There were some precincts where Democratic Socialist voter turnout hit well over 90%....unprecendented turnouts. There were some reports of precincts hitting over 100% and the Democratic Socialists claimed it was due to same day voter registrations.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:37 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Boy you talk about a backfire. Best thing that ever happened was the way 2020 went down.
I hope they prove it, dont really care about arrest but it would be nice.
I JUST WANT IT NOT TO HAPPEN AGAIN. Fix this shite.
I hope they prove it, dont really care about arrest but it would be nice.
I JUST WANT IT NOT TO HAPPEN AGAIN. Fix this shite.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:39 am to texas tortilla
/\ EXCELLANT POINT MADE HERE /\
A point I have not presented nearly enough.
"There would be no substantial VOTER fraud without the WELFARE fraud."
Such a salient point bears repeating - and perhaps should be the flag bearing item in our discussion of fair elections.
DEMOCRATs love welfare FRAUD - we have already seen that a vast majority of their campaign money comes from MASSIVE welfare fraud. And to "pump up those numbers" they have to rely on ILLEGAL ALIENs to produce the names required for bloating the registration roles.
Watching the democarts go apeshit over rooting out the fraud is all you need to know about their sincerity wrt voting fraud.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:39 am to omegaman66
quote:
, in addition to the results changing visibly on national TV
How else would they change? It isnt like the vote counting is synced up to the news station. Precincts report their results in batches and then the news updates their number.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:41 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Raffenberger couldn’t find them.
Raffensberger DIDN'T WANT TO FIND THEM, and Barr's DOJ had even less interest.
Simple as that.
There were plenty of reports within 24 hours of the election that things were amiss in the Atlanta area.
The current case has been going on for a while now. It is in EVERYONE'S best interest to make sure we have legitimate elections.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Based on what, exactly?
Reported irregularities and fraud. But you knew that. The State's were contested but the "insurrection" nullified all that would have come with it. But you know that too.
For someone who plays smart, you come across as having the legal mind of a Sovereign Citizen arguing a speeding ticket.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:44 am to riccoar
quote:
Reported irregularities and fraud. But you knew that.
No, I'm talking the source of the legal requirement for a "forensic audit"
It's not in federal law. Is there a GA statute specifically requiring that?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:46 am to omegaman66
quote:
addition to a 1000 people voting from a single house
In Bihar, India? That's the only thing I can find about 1,000 votes from a single home address
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:48 am to riccoar
quote:
Raffenberger knew that fraud could only be discovered by forensic audit. It's why he never would call for it. It's also why January 6th was staged. So they could suspend rules and push Georgia and other State's through without risk of their votes being sent back. Being sent back would have automatically required a forensic audit conducted under sole authority of the Georgia legislature.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:50 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
There were some precincts where Democratic Socialist voter turnout hit well over 90%....unprecendented turnouts.
It’s more interesting when you realize that registered voters is an almost useless number. And when you compare votes to eligible voters in numerous townships in Milwaukee in 2020, there were multiple places that votes exceeded eligible voters.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:50 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Raffenberger couldn’t find them. How much you wanna bet Pam does?
Already found 300K+ of them... and that was before the 700 boxes of votes to review.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:50 am to Flats
quote:
It doesn't really matter if it would have made a difference in the outcome because the outcome can't be reversed, and that was true about 2-3 days after the election. I guess it could be a positive in that it would get peoples' attention more, but keeping this from happening again is what I think is important. And I think it's important whether the election outcome was impacted or not.
Continue to believe the most likely sources of organized and meaningful fraud were Abrams and her organization(s) (and similar ones) using the COVID-era changes to their advantage in fraudulent ways.
I don't think it's a coincidence that a lot of those orgs have closed up ground game ops or moved to new entities, etc.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:51 am to sgallo3
quote:
It isnt like the vote counting is synced up to the news station.
Bro. You think they’re logging into SOS websites and typing numbers into spreadsheets?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:51 am to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
It’s amazing how you continue to be such an intellectually dishonest hack.
There’s WIDESPREAD EVIDENCE already out there. It will take you five minutes to find it on X
His TDS is crazy.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:52 am to Pettifogger
We used to call them ACORN until the press around them got too hot.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if they can find the direct/credible evidence.
As you see it.
Popular
Back to top


0








