- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Your Discomfort Means It's Working
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
would drag them into socialist circles.
Says the CCP cheerleader.
1
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:20 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
quote:
I explained the deeper thought processes in place.
You just want cheap Chinese shite.
No, I want conservative economics.
Of which a cornerstone is competition.
You baws are terrified of competition. The new girly male.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:21 am
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:20 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Says the CCP cheerleader.
Have you bought your "tax the rich" prom dress yet?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:23 am to udtiger
quote:
I know in the long run I will get that back and more.
Experienced people know that all of the big 10 to 20% dips over past decades have been followed by a recovery 100% of the time.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"only Leftists want more government to fix the problems created by government". But that's "conservative" now, somehow.
Our government, allowing others to levy taxes against American corporations IS the issue.
You and Roger would like to live in fantasy land and pretend that American companies will thrive long term, when the exact opposite has been proven to be true. I even provided examples.
The “conservative” approach is to not allow yourself to be messed over.
I do find it ironic that an attorney and an admitted cuck are the ones promoting the CCP and supporting the suppression of free trade.
The irony is astounding.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:28 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Our government, allowing others to levy taxes against American corporations IS the issue.
It hasn't been an issue for 3-4 decades.
quote:
You and Roger would like to live in fantasy land and pretend that American companies will thrive long term, when the exact opposite has been proven to be true
This has not, in fact, been proven. The opposite has. We've been discussing it the past few days. I even made a table.
We're in a tier of our own and have benefited more than any other country during this 30-ish year period of "globalization" (the post-Cold War era).
quote:
I do find it ironic that an attorney and an admitted cuck are the ones promoting the CCP
Again, you're wrong. I'm not "promoting the CCP"
Their domestic protectionism and over-reliance on manufacturing has fricked their long term outlook. I don't want the US to copy their policies of failure. I am anti-CCP.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:29 am
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:29 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Our government, allowing others to levy taxes against American corporations IS the issue.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:30 am to Ten Bears
quote:
It’s been a real shame watching MAGA morph into some sort of weird class warfare, envious little bitches
That's what I said yesterday.
quote:
SFP and Roger have said 10,000 times on here that the MAGA train was going to end up in Bernie-land. I guess we are already there.
LINK
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Have you bought your "tax the rich" prom dress yet?
Sorry Roger, I’m not a tranny, you have to him get your perverted fix from watching some dude rail your chic.
As for tax the rich, the “rich” in this instance are foreign companies that have used state funded subsidies to bankrupt American companies. They have also had a decided advantage in that they have rigged the game to favor their companies over US companies to our detriment.
My analogy of your view on tariffs is akin to you supporting trannys in WOMEN’S sports, we both know that the dudes in dresses have an advantage. But since you are pulling for team tranny, you like the results.
Then here is an analogy for your deflection from reality.
You stating that American companies have been successful in the past is akin to you saying that women have benefited from having to compete against trannies, because they have to up their game. And if they can’t compete, oh well.
Again, you (and SFP) are team CCP and team tranny.
At least be honest about it.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:34 am to Bunk Moreland
As I pointed out on page 1, the "article" in OP is literal BernieBro porn.
I just watched the first few minutes of Bessent on Tucker. More of the same shite (our "realignment" and "american workers", etc)
I just watched the first few minutes of Bessent on Tucker. More of the same shite (our "realignment" and "american workers", etc)
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
I want libertarian MAGA back. 
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:36 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Again, you (and SFP) are team CCP
You can make shite up all you want, but it's still a lie
quote:
nd team tranny.
And somehow your imagination can create even bigger lies
quote:
in this instance are foreign companies that have used state funded subsidies to bankrupt American companies. They have also had a decided advantage in that they have rigged the game to favor their companies over US companies to our detriment.
but it's not "to our detriment" and American consumers have benefited greatly.
As Milton Friedman said
quote:
What about the argument of unfair competition? What about the argument that the Japanese dump their goods below cost? As a consumer, all I can say is the more dumping the better. If the Japanese government is so ill-advised as to tax its taxpayers in order to send to us, at below cost, TV sets and other things, why should we as a nation refuse reverse foreign aid?
quote:
You stating that American companies have been successful in the past is akin to you saying that women have benefited from having to compete against trannies, because they have to up their game. And if they can’t compete, oh well.
Your major flaw is assuming American companies aren't doing well, when they are. You've built your argument around this lie.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:37 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I want libertarian MAGA back.
As SDV would say
You're seeing all the worst of muh fight MAGA taking over.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:38 am to Stinger_1066
Covid was literally fricking four years ago and people have already forgotten what “temporary interruption in supply chain” did to this country. We were literally fighting over toilet paper. Imagine what would happen in a real emergency where the supply chain ceased to exist not just was shut down?
I will continue to remind folks your grocery bill today is around 110% more than it was 4 years ago. What we are doing isn’t working. And given who is so against it, I tend to lean toward the President.
I will continue to remind folks your grocery bill today is around 110% more than it was 4 years ago. What we are doing isn’t working. And given who is so against it, I tend to lean toward the President.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
I straight up chuckled.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:39 am to Bunk Moreland
We seem to be at a controversy. Are
(A) stock market crashes bad, but the Dems caused this.
OR
(B) this stock market crash is good because bleeding the patient will purge the ill humors?
(A) stock market crashes bad, but the Dems caused this.
OR
(B) this stock market crash is good because bleeding the patient will purge the ill humors?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:39 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Again, you (and SFP) are team CCP and team tranny.
You people are attracted the the dumbest, simplest shite.
This is such a childish take.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:41 am to TigerDoc
quote:
(B) this stock market crash is good because bleeding the patient will purge the ill humors?
Does no good to bleed the humors of the patient if the patient’s behavior continues to remain the same.
Either the economy is a symptom of a deep rooted spending problem that needs to be addressed, or the economy is an indicator of strong fundamentals and these tariffs are an ego exercise.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:44 am to wallowinit
quote:
Just barely keeping your head above water, having no emergency funds, and your children having to choose between shite jobs with no future is not what I call thriving
If you have put yourself in this position it’s no one’s fault but your own. Personal responsibility has to come into play at some point. It’s not the government’s job to make sure you have a safety net.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your major flaw is assuming American companies aren't doing well
That is not a flaw.
American companies are overcoming adverse conditions, which were arbitrarily allowed to be put in place by our government.
Riley Gaines tied against you and Roger’s dick chic, that doesn’t mean that she benefitted from the competition.
quote:
but it's not "to our detriment" and American consumers have benefited greatly.
I’m sure drug dealers “hook up” their consumers as well. The meth-heads benefit short term.
Keep supporting the CCP ( which you stupidly say is not the enemy).
I guess they are “friendly” drug dealers.
Again, you are a moron when it comes to this. Stick to the law.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News