- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Youngkin: I won't stop local governments that want to impose COVID mandates
Posted on 11/18/21 at 9:50 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 11/18/21 at 9:50 am to Bobby OG Johnson
What if he said “ I won't stop local governments that want to impose CRT mandates”?
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 9:51 am
Posted on 11/18/21 at 9:51 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Businesses are one thing. The local governments are another.
Why? Governing at the most local level possible is not a bad thing. If Fairfax and Alexandria's local governments enact mandates because their constituents want them, why should Richmond stop them?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:00 am to Indefatigable
Tyranny is tyranny no matter who enacts it.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:05 am to Bobby OG Johnson
The citizens in those places want the mandates their local governments enact.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:08 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Governing at the most local level possible is not a bad thing.
I agree, but it's also not the sole litmus test for a policy. What if the local citizens decide guns are icky or that a baker must bake that cake?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:09 am to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Youngkin: I won't stop local governments that want to impose COVID mandates
Don't really have an argument against this. Let those communities sort it themselves.
And let them get their asses handed to them in court.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:11 am to Indefatigable
quote:
The citizens in those places want the mandates their local governments enact.
You don't get to ignore the constitutional rights of all citizens just because it is done at a local level. Governor's job is to protect those rights.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:18 am to Flats
quote:
What if the local citizens decide guns are icky or that a baker must bake that cake?
Then an impacted person in that jurisdiction (or business) will go to the federal courts with a 1983 action and get an injunction or the law struck down.
It isn't like Youngkin can get a law through the VA legislature banning mandates like other, redder states have...even if he wanted to.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 10:20 am
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:30 am to upgrayedd
Hey, if some locales want to impose slavery what's the problem? This freedom and individual rights thingy has gone on long enough.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:41 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Then an impacted person in that jurisdiction (or business) will go to the federal courts
Is that governing at the lowest level?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:42 am to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
That ship has sailed.
If you are not willing to take control you have already lost.
never call yourself a small government advocate, if you really ever believed in small government
The power dynamic ideally should be local government > state government > federal government but we do exactly the opposite in this country
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 10:43 am
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:48 am to Flats
quote:
Is that governing at the lowest level?
Considering that inherently only federal courts can handle 1983 actions, and the suit would be filed in the district court where the policy took place, yes.
That is the lowest level government possible under those circumstance.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:52 am to East Coast Band
Private business should be allowed to mandate whatever they want. If you don’t like it, take your business elsewhere. The government shouldn’t be telling the private sector what to do. But if private businesses have received governmental assistant, they are fair game.
Now if public offices are mandating such, that’s a totally different story.
Now if public offices are mandating such, that’s a totally different story.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:52 am to Ross
So you are also ok with constitutional rights being trampled on as long as it was voted on 51 to 49 by a local government.
We should only be against tyranny at the federal level?

We should only be against tyranny at the federal level?

Posted on 11/18/21 at 10:59 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Meanwhile...

quote:
Congressman Byron Donalds
@RepDonaldsPress
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
Today, America's Governor, @GovRonDeSantis, traveled to Brandon, Florida, and officially signed into law four pieces of legislation protecting Floridians from JB's illegal vaccine mandate.
DONT TREAD ON FLORIDA!
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:02 am to memphis tiger
quote:
Looks like a lot of people in this thread only want small government and freedom as long as it’s the small government and freedom they agree with
No. A lot of people want individuals to have freedom of choice. Local governments mandating anything does not fall in line with that.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:07 am to Bobby OG Johnson
There are a couple of distinct differences between Florida and Virginia. In Florida, Desantis pretty much has unobstructed path to carrying out his agenda, as both the legislature and state supreme court are rather solidly in his corner in terms of those Republican majorities. On the other hand, the Republican majority legislature and supposed "Republican" majority state supreme court in Virginia are more inclined to be haters with the pushback, particularly in terms of a Desantis type agenda.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:07 am to East Coast Band
quote:
Maybe city of Richmond or city of Norfolk
Probably most of the independent cities (except rightwing places like Waynesboro and Galax), and Fairfax, Arlington and Loudoun counties.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:15 am to Indefatigable
quote:
That is the lowest level government possible under those circumstance.
Unless the governor could accomplish the exact same result.
There’s nuance to this and there are valid points on both sides. I think the “if you want the governor to do this you don’t believe in small government” claim is specious and lazy, as would be the opposite claim of “if you don’t want him to do this you’re a pussy who doesn’t want to fight back”.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:10 pm to Flats
quote:
There’s nuance to this and there are valid points on both sides. I think the “if you want the governor to do this you don’t believe in small government” claim is specious and lazy, as would be the opposite claim of “if you don’t want him to do this you’re a pussy who doesn’t want to fight back”.
Agreed
Popular
Back to top



0






