- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:27 pm to stout
Unless a lawyer can rightfully interpret that hot mess differently...
That is the most trifling, arrogant court exchange I have read to date. (I lie, that Judge Sullivan was it? w/ Flynn was pretty full of himself and just as unjust) This Judge speaks as if he is a BFD and god of all in DC.
People that speak/or act/boast like they are a BFD, usually aren't.
Who tipped off the govt think tank of matters of national security to file a lawsuit to the shadiest blackmailed FISA court DC political Judge?
Did the judge say something about communications in secret on Friday? Who in the entire frick of fricks allowed this POS Judge to be privy to: national security, the CIC, and foreign affairs?
did the Judge mean just have Trump pardon, himself? As it is moot.
THIS IS INSANE.
That is the most trifling, arrogant court exchange I have read to date. (I lie, that Judge Sullivan was it? w/ Flynn was pretty full of himself and just as unjust) This Judge speaks as if he is a BFD and god of all in DC.
People that speak/or act/boast like they are a BFD, usually aren't.
Who tipped off the govt think tank of matters of national security to file a lawsuit to the shadiest blackmailed FISA court DC political Judge?
Did the judge say something about communications in secret on Friday? Who in the entire frick of fricks allowed this POS Judge to be privy to: national security, the CIC, and foreign affairs?
did the Judge mean just have Trump pardon, himself? As it is moot. THIS IS INSANE.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:30 pm to LSURussian
This judge needs to go away. Who the frick does he think he is? He should be presiding over divorce cases.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:31 pm to cajunangelle
Who are the plaintiffs and how do they have standing since no one contesting election fraud in 2020 did.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:32 pm to stout
If we had justice in our country, this judge would be impeached.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:36 pm to imjustafatkid
I really want SFP to weigh in on this
Or Hank
Or Hank
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:36 pm to stout
These judges are about to lose power due to overreaching. This will go to the Supremes and Trump will win. You can’t have liberal partisan judges trying to run the country.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:36 pm to stout
What is the bases of Judge Boasberg removing Article II powers from the Executive branch? He did not explain that point.
I read that and the DOJ seemed a little dumbfounded by the judges query. It's like Margo Cleveland stated toward the end, it none of your fricking business.
I read that and the DOJ seemed a little dumbfounded by the judges query. It's like Margo Cleveland stated toward the end, it none of your fricking business.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:44 pm to CR4090
quote:
Why can't the DOJ be proactive and get clearance from friendly courts?
Because they don’t need clearance. If they start getting clearance from judges what’s next? The judge might as well be president
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:45 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
I really want SFP to weigh in on this
Or Hank
Why? These guys are idiots.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:45 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
I really want SFP to weigh in on this
DOJ is FA
Well see if any of them ultimately FO
The DOJ is undertaking an extremely aggressive and potentially unprecedented strategy. The politicians are safe regardless but the lawyers should be anxious
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:46 pm to Drizzt
I am a bit concerned. This Judge is like the teachers pet of Chief Justice Roberts. Isn't he on the FISA court?
Mike Davis does not ever say things like this. He said Roberts had a chance already and should have nipped this in the bud. This is so absurd it feels coordinated. No way this Judge just rando got this case from a rando govt think tank.
Mike Davis does not ever say things like this. He said Roberts had a chance already and should have nipped this in the bud. This is so absurd it feels coordinated. No way this Judge just rando got this case from a rando govt think tank.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:47 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
If we had justice in our country, this judge would be impeached.
Once again our feckless congress can't do the right thing
I would fix congress long before the judiciary as they are the real problem and that is saying something
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:49 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Can you remember when you weren't a complete a-hole? (Actually, I don't remember that...)
More crying
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
What is the bases of Judge Boasberg removing Article II powers from the Executive branch? He did not explain that point.
The issue is if this is a legal use of those powers and a military and/or diplomatic exercise in reality
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:50 pm to Adajax
quote:
Who are the plaintiffs
I assume the guys in Central America
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:50 pm to LSURussian
quote:
LSURussian
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
DOJ is FA Well see if any of them ultimately FO The DOJ is undertaking an extremely aggressive and potentially unprecedented strategy. The politicians are safe regardless but the lawyers should be anxious
Nah bro. The Biden lawyers went this far or worse. They had the dc judges in their back pockets. The new admin has the law on their side. Regulators mount up!!! Not worried a bit as there is no lawfare right? RIGHT!!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:53 pm to stout
frick the judge
Posted on 3/17/25 at 8:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The issue is if this is a legal use of those powers and a military and/or diplomatic exercise in reality
Stephen Miller told CNN exactly why it was lawful
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News