- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Without a roll call vote of the House... it is a Coup. Not an Inquiry..." Tom Fitton
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:26 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:26 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
Wrong again.
Quoting error does not make it so.
Quoting error does not make it so.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:34 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Wrong again.
Quoting error does not make it so.
This is all Mickey Mouse horse shite because the democrats are too fricking gutless to make a stand. They need their lackeys in the press to make it alright first.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:55 pm to AggieHank86
Hank, you're kind of a dick, but I like that, so I made you a gif:


Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:04 pm to udtiger
quote:
Odd that Hank doesnt have a response to this (which was shamelessly taken from And McCarthy [whose article I linked]).
I haven't read the article, but will. That was my analysis.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:09 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
dissolution of the USA within 200 years.
new world order in less than 50.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:11 pm to Screaming_Viking
quote:
Screaming_Viking Member since Oct 2019 8 posts
Not sure who this guy is...but either he/she has a crush on me, or wants people to confuse us.
Creepy.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I know that I base my Constitutional analysis upon the opinions of a guy with only an undergraduate liberal arts degree from a third-tier university.
Well I sure as hell won't base it on your analysis.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:15 pm to AggieHank86
well if you base it on those dumb arse democrat leaders then you're just as dumb as they are!
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I know that I base my Constitutional analysis upon the opinions of a guy with only an undergraduate liberal arts degree from a third-tier university.
Acts like A&M is a bastion of educational excellence. Clown.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:19 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
You dodos want a way to hate the constitution.
all this congressional review is legal.
Its not by violence.
Writing a bill of impeachment is legal.
quote:
noun: coup d'état
1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.
all this congressional review is legal.
Its not by violence.
Writing a bill of impeachment is legal.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 8:19 pm to CelticDog
The dodo is extinct, by fricktards like you:
quote:
noun: fricktard
1.
a dullard, idiot, simpleton, asswhipe, asshat
Used in a sentence: CelticDog is a fricktard.
Actions based on lies are not legal
Illegal actions, based on said lies, will drive a wedge through this country
Driving a wedge through this country for short-term political/personal gains will get you little in the long run, and will lead to long-term pain.
Your country, and my country, our country, will suffer.
quote:
noun: fricktard
1.
a dullard, idiot, simpleton, asswhipe, asshat
Used in a sentence: CelticDog is a fricktard.
Actions based on lies are not legal
Illegal actions, based on said lies, will drive a wedge through this country
Driving a wedge through this country for short-term political/personal gains will get you little in the long run, and will lead to long-term pain.
Your country, and my country, our country, will suffer.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 10/6/19 at 8:28 pm to CelticDog
quote:
all this congressional review is legal.
Its not by violence.
n.
The sudden overthrow of a government by a usually small group of persons in or previously in positions of authority.
It is the first definition listed when I just looked it up. No mention of violence in the definition. This definition sure does seem to fit the circumstances imho.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I know that I base my Constitutional analysis upon the opinions of a guy with only an undergraduate liberal arts degree from a third-tier university.
Attack the messenger to discredit the message. That just doesn't fit my view of a libertarian. Enlighten me as to how this is relevant? I mean, if your general practitioner from Podunk U finds the melonoma that your dermatologist from Johns Hopkins missed, should his findings be ignored?
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:31 pm to jimmy the leg
Seems like many Republican commentators and apologists need a refresher on what a coup actually is. The impeachment process is a Constitutional process and is not a coup.
from Brittanica online
Coup d’état, also called Coup, the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a coup is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A coup rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups.
from Brittanica online
Coup d’état, also called Coup, the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a coup is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A coup rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 10/7/19 at 12:29 am to GeorgeWest
quote:We know.
Seems like many Republican commentators and apologists need a refresher on what a coup actually is.
"...a political uprising in which power changes hands or a successful strategic move."
The Dems are attempting it via this Fake Impeachment Inquiry. Not looking great for them.
A coup need not be violent. It can be achieved by whatever means are available. Gaddafi accomplish his coup in Libya with 70 young military officers. They took over the few radio stations in Lybia, and announced that the existing government had fled the country, and that those who hadn't would soon be killed. They fled within hours in response to the Fake News. Gaddafi took over.
Total bluff. But it worked.
This post was edited on 10/7/19 at 1:33 am
Posted on 10/7/19 at 1:19 am to Buckeye Jeaux
House dems have completely abdicated their elected responsibility to do the people's business and are focused on entirely reversing the people's vote and choice. By using whatever means legal or illegal. Setting precedent after precedent as it relates to nefarious and under the table manufactured methods. Some likely to be criminal in nature. With the complicity of a beyond corrupt water carrying, rumor mongering and outright lying group that at one point was known as the press. Which has abdicated their position of calling balls and strikes and have went all in on a bloodless or bloody coup attempt. Whichever the case may be.
The only positive is their old guard institutions have lost the trust of the American people and will never regain it. So there's that.
The only positive is their old guard institutions have lost the trust of the American people and will never regain it. So there's that.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 4:59 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
The impeachment process is a Constitutional process and is not a coup
Accepting your premise, that means that a President cannot break the law when he exercises his constitutional authority (for example, firing a subordinate).
Posted on 10/13/19 at 10:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I know that I base my Constitutional analysis upon the opinions of a guy with only an undergraduate liberal arts degree from a third-tier university.
I didn’t realize it but yeah...and undergraduate English degreefrom George Washington University.
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 10:05 am
Popular
Back to top

1









