re: Willis/Wade Trial Day 2 Link

Are they done for the day?

quote:

---

When this dude meets with the judge he should say that he revokes his privilege and burn those two bitches down.

---

The problem is it’s not his privilege to revoke. Privilege belongs to Wade, his client. Now, I could see him saying frick it, I will tell all and let Wade bring him to the bar. At this point his legal career may be in jeopardy anyway. But he doesn’t have privilege to waive.

Gotcha.

quote:

---

He violated that.

---

Yep, inexcusably sloppy. Willis has no real regard for the law though. That is the root of this mess. She was obviously lying about watching the Wade testimony. She has no compunction about it.

She alluded to the fact her father was going to testify when she was on the stand. "My father is a very stubborn man ... well, you'll see." He was no doubt watching every second.

I don't know if the judge tosses the Willis team off the case, but she and her minions are clearly corrupt as hell.

quote:

---

The state blew up his privilege when they went after his credibility on sexual assault claims that led to his leaving the partnership.

---

The question, if I understand this, is he'd claimed privilege about his cause for departure. Sexual assault and discipline shouldn't fall under EP. Therefore, the judge questions whether he actually knows what EP covers and what it doesn't.

But the Willis team is so gratuitous with nastiness, that they just couldn't help themselves going after Bradley. Just like Willis couldn't help herself deridding Wade as impotent. (She's damn lucky one of the Defense Attorneys did not ask how she knew Wade was impotent in 2020)

quote:

---

Just like Willis couldn't help herself deridding Wade as impotent. (She's damn lucky one of the Defense Attorneys did not ask how she knew Wade was impotent in 2020)

---

Some things jump off the page themselves.... I'm hoping that was so obvious to the judge that it didn't asking.

Yeah I had to go re-watch the last 2-ish hours. This crazy situation just got a bit insane.

Sadow right now preparing for Monday





What the hell was the attorney for the DA doing?


*ETA: I am just now getting to the associate. What the hell did the attorney for the DA do by calling him? She got in nothing about the sexual harassment and opened up a shite ton of questions without privilege.

Ronbot rooting for lawfare ?!? Who could’ve guessed it

Don't be a dumbass... although that would be par for this board. The bills of indictment stand on their own. However, if Willis and Wade were to be removed, the case gets taken away from Fulton County and the decision as to who prosecuted goes to the GA AG. I think by law he would be compelled to appoint a Special Prosecutor.....so maybe another DA from a neighboring County or a private attorney.

The problem becomes one of money and time for the replacement. No matter who would be appointed, he/she would need time to get up to speed on the case executing a significant delay. Most probably the replacement skinny downs the case going after the juiciest portion....if the case is assigned outside of the DA circuit, I'm not sure that the new SP in that case would want to bother and he could decline prosecution upon review....at best these guys can only charge at a 70/ hrs rate. So motivation is not all that great. Feds cannot move in . So a Willis removal is a win for Trump no matter what the inevitable outcome is.

If he's elected it either gets delayed another 5 years or it is dropped altogether.

quote:

---

Derailing the current docket schedule by replacing Mutt and Jeff will pretty much punt this past November if it does proceed.

---

As this is a state prosecution, that becomes somewhat irrelevant. They'll just try him while he sits as President if he wins.

*ETA: until the USSC rules on this specific issue, there is nothing in the Constitution or any other guidance that prevents a state from prosecuting a sitting President. All of the arguments for why the federal DOJ can't (or shouldn't to be accurate) prosecute a sitting President are based in separation of powers arguments, which only apply at the federal level. This would fall directly under state's rights and their vast policing power (which existed long before the federal government became a leviathan).