Started By
Message

re: Why does the left keep spouting off about mythical Gaza genocide?

Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
4677 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:18 pm to
Still no media or progressive tears for the millions in Sudan
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
34927 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:19 pm to
I wouldn’t argue for or against anything until I saw some reliable evidence/proof of those things, as you’ve framed it, being true and accurate.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
82579 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:23 pm to
Powermullah believes.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
65654 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:25 pm to
It’s pure propaganda and it’s working so it’s not going to stop
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30449 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:26 pm to
genocide???? close, but are they trying to get them out, or have the other Muslim countries try to clean the area up, 100% yes

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what they are doing, with their bombing strategy/ THey bombed the frick out of that area, to get rid of, or get others to fix the area from scratch.

There was ZERO reasons to bomb that area the way they did, they bombed it to destroy everything in that area.



Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
65654 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:27 pm to
Lmfao
Posted by leftywilliams
Member since Nov 2025
147 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:28 pm to
Because they are stupid enough to believe their Jew-hating leaders.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
65654 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:29 pm to
Powermullah won’t rest until every country is England and the entire U.S. is like Minnesota and Michigan
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
504 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Why does the left keep spouting off about mythical Gaza genocide? Are you all just stupid and the like?
I want to get my facts straight here.

Killing somewhere between 3% and 4% of the entire population of Gaza in one year is NOT a "genocide," but killing 0.05% of the Christians of Nigeria in two decades IS a "genocide."

Do I have that right?

FTR, I do not think that EITHER is a "genocide," but the consensus here seems to be otherwise (at least as to the latter). Apparently, the Poli Board definition of "genocide," is highly-variable and dependent entirely upon the religion of the victims.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 6:39 pm
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
3825 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:34 pm to
Not sure about your last paragraph/ statement on the reasoning behind Isreal's reaction, but they used the fact that Hammas started this to absolutely flatten Gaza, killing a lot of people that had nothing to do with this.
Netanyahu has always wanted the whole of Palestine, and Trump did nothing to stop this.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
82579 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:37 pm to
He tries soooo hard to fe middle of the road.

Guy is a clown
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
34927 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:39 pm to
Correct me if I’m wrong, but were there not a number of times throughout the pendency of this thing, particularly earlier on, when Israel was prepared to cease further military operations, if certain conditions were met? I don’t see that mentioned very much (if ever) during these discussions/debates.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170143 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:


So you are stating that it was a false narrative.

Got it.

Genocide doesn't require complete elimination. Jews are still here. Was the Holocaust not a genocide?
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56560 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:48 pm to
Because they can even though there was no genocide.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
35401 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Correct me if I’m wrong, but were there not a number of times throughout the pendency of this thing, particularly earlier on, when Israel was prepared to cease further military operations, if certain conditions were met? I don’t see that mentioned very much (if ever) during these discussions/debates.


Israel is notorious for breaking cease fires.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
35401 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

I want to get my facts straight here.

Killing somewhere between 3% and 4% of the entire population of Gaza in one year is NOT a "genocide," but killing 0.05% of the Christians of Nigeria in two decades IS a "genocide."

Do I have that right?

FTR, I do not think that EITHER is a "genocide," but the consensus here seems to be otherwise (at least as to the latter). Apparently, the Poli Board definition of "genocide," is highly-variable and dependent entirely upon the religion of the victims.


It's not based on the number of people killed. It's about the intent to destroy in part or whole entire people based on things like religion, race, etc.

But I'm curious, at what % of killing innocent people do you believe is enough to qualify as genocide? And does that also mean if someone kills 0.5% less than that, it's ok?

Sounds to be me like both are genocide.

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170143 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:04 pm to
quote:


Israel is notorious for breaking cease fires.

They broke the most recent one 80 times in the first 10 days
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
82579 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:19 pm to
Link to the 80 powermullah?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
504 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

It's not based on the number of people killed. It's about the intent to destroy in part or whole entire people based on things like religion, race, etc.
I agree.

The Israelis clearly DO have the capability of essentially eradicating every living Muslim in Gaza, yet they choose not do so ... ergo, no "genocide." Boko Haran, on the other hand, certainly lacks the military capacity of Israel, but if they are actually trying to kill every Christian in Nigeria, they are doing a piss-poor job of it. The limited numbers do, however, suggest to me that eradication of all 100 million Christians in the country is NOT their goal.
quote:

But I'm curious, at what % of killing innocent people do you believe is enough to qualify as genocide?
Where is the line between an atrocity and a genocide? I don't know that there is a specific delineation, so I will have to quote Potter Stewart and say that "I will know it when I see it." Probably somewhere in the neighborhood of half (maybe as low as a quarter or a third), with a clear INTENT of reaching 100%.

I think we also need to remember the distinction between genocide and ethnic cleansing. In the former, the affirmative goal is death of every member of the victim group, whereas the latter just wants the victim group gone and the perpetrators would be perfectly content if the victim group just left the area.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 7:34 pm
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8412 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:00 pm to
Because they are fricking retarded and operating purely on emotion… not facts.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram