re: Why does Fox bring Mark Fuhrman on every time there is Police scandal?

Dude you are so not getting it once the 5th is taken he can't answer anything if he does then everything is fair game what do you not get?

Why do you think they asked him about planting evidence later?

Damn get a clue.

quote:

---

Dude you are so not getting it once the 5th is taken he can't answer anything if he does then everything is fair game what do you not get?

---

Dude, what do you not get, he choose to plead the 5th. The evidence of his perjury as to the use of the N-word was already on the record. If it was only about the N-word then you acknowledge your previous testimony was incorrect and explain it was used for the purpose of giving an accurate account for the book/movie, etc...

The reason he pled the 5th is because he absolutely did not want to open himself up to further charges.

And I don't know who did it but explain the bloody sock not showing up in the original undisturbed crime scene photos but then supposedly being discovered lying on the wide open floor of the master bedroom?

Also, how did a sock being worn get blood soak through the top and bottom in exactly the same pattern and how did the blood from said sock contain a chemical found in blood containment viles?

It is baffling. Surely they can find someone else with his expertise that isn't universally known as a racist.

quote:

---

Dude, he pled the 5th as to whether he planted evidence.

---

But that's the trial, not the investigation.

quote:

---

But that's the trial, not the investigation.

---

Still waiting on anyone to explain the absence of the bloody sock in the undisturbed crime scene photos, it's later inclusion with matching blood patterns top and bottom despite supposedly being worn at the time the blood came in contact and the presence of the chemical found in blood containment viles....?

Anyone?

Buller?

You need to go back and do your homework.

The detectives found solid, incriminating evidence everywhere. At the scene, in ojs car, his house...they never needed to plant anything. Ojs house and car were soaked with Nicoles blood. The CSIs came in and butt fricked the entire crime scene. They didnt where gloves, they moved shite. They even delivered ojs blood samples to Vanatter at the crime scene which is a huge no no. It was a total clown show. This was what really killed the prosecutions case.

Bailey knew Furman lied about saying that n word and everyone in LA knew he was being sent to the stand in cross with instructions to plead the 5th once the tape came out, and that's when they hit him with the planting of evidence question which was pure brilliance.

The detectives had oj dead to rights and the same evidence eventually hung him in the civil trial. It was the crime labs mistakes, mixed with a dog shite prosecution team, a mostly black jury, and trial theatrics that screwed the criminal trial for the prosecution.

You brought up the sock, dumbshit.

All I said was that the detective work was good. Kaelin heard someone back there where the glove was found before detectives ever arrived at ojs house. No one planted anything. Jesus, oj told his agent years later that he did it.

They had victims blood in ojs house and car
Ojs blood at the scene
Wound on oj consistent with crime scene blood
Glove are scene
Glove at house
Receipt where oj purchased the gloves
Ojs designer shoe prints in blood at the scene
Pics of oj wearing the shoes
911 tape of oj threatening to kill nicole
Pics of nicole beaten shite less by oj
8 or so prior domestic disturbance calls
Letters nicole wrote sharing her fears that he would kill her

He should have been screwed.

The trial was a disaster, but everything up until the CSIs arrived was fairly well handled.

There was tons of real evidence against OJ, but for whatever reason someone tampered or planted additional evidence plus Fuhrman perjured himself and pleaded the 5th to planting evidence.

Whatever his reasoning for pleading the 5th doesn't negate that it actually happened on the record.

There was plenty of reasonable doubt for an acquittal. We all know OJ did it, but Fuhrman was the main reason he was acquitted and is the only one that went to prison.

I see this thread is still staggering on so I will make one more stab at your silly list of prosecutorial faults.

quote:

---

Yet you can't answer how a sock that showed up as an exhibit at trial and was alleged by LAPD to have been found lying in plain sight in OJ's master bedroom WAS NOT present in the undisturbed crime scene photos or collected from the original CSI team...?

---

Because an object doesn't show up in one shot does not mean that object was not present. As I recall that shot, the bed was in the lower right corner of the photo. The sock could have easily been just out of sight behind the bed.

And the charge of the blood being present on "both top and bottom with same pattern" means to me that OJ used the sock to stop the bleeding by wrapping it around his finger to stem the flow of blood - or at least to keep it from dropping on the carpet.

That is a far more probable scenario than a bunch of detectives getting together to pour blood from a collected sample onto a 'sock that wasn't there.' The crime scene team was amateurish but nobody is that stupid. And it certainly would not have bee Fuhrman so that is irrelevant in your attack on him.

quote:

---

the picture of OJ wearing a BM shoe was published by NI years later, they had no proof OJ had such a shoe.

---

You are correct about the photo - that was not available at the time. However you are not correct about 'having such a shoe" - they had a receipt from when he bought the shoes, but could not "prove' he had ever actually worn them.

quote:

---

The Gloves actually didn't fit.

---

.

No - that is not proven. Anyone can struggle to make a glove not go on if they dont want it to. And - I watched that happen in real time - OJ was wearing latex gloves "to protect the evidence" and those latex gloves only came down halfway on his fingers. I was saying before he started that he will never get those gloves on over the latex gloves.

quote:

---

Mark fuhrman did a piss poor job and helped a piss poor Prosecution team hand the trial to the dirt bag dream team.

---

again - Fuhrman was/'is not a racist, any more than 99% of all people alive at the time. The definition of 'racist' is so watered down now that it has no meaning whatsoever to any thinking individual. So continuing to call him a racist just demeans whatever argument you may have. It shows as complete lack of objectivity on your part.

You can take pot shots about his not adequately parrying the unfair charges of 'racism' hurled at him during the trial - and a competent judge would not have allowed it. The trial was a complete farce - with the judge allowing overwhelming evidence of guilt to be shoved aside for the sake of the tired shibboleth to 'he racess."

BUT - Fuhrman was the most competent person on the investigation. Period. Without a doubt.

I still don't understand why this topic is being aired out again. It has been hashed over more than any other single event in my 78 years of life.

I watched the investigation reports and the trial - did you?? It was about all that was on TV in those days. OR are you just regurgitating the talking points you have read about???????

Now - unless something sane is posted in this thread I am out again.