- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does Canada want to build a pipeline?
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:16 am to BoneSpurs
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:16 am to BoneSpurs
There seems to be a lot of misunderstandings about the pipeline first of all it created about 1000 jobs even though they said it was going to create around 11,000.
Second of all they are not getting petroleum from this pipeline they are getting what’s called tar sand, and once that tar sand is sent to a refinery they use petroleum to refine it about 3 to 4 times more petroleum then would be used for a crude oil. Also it’s very difficult to get to TAr Sand And it is incredibly thick and toxic and the pipeline has already had 12 weeks that cost billions of dollars not to mention Tar Sand when it does leak sinks to the very bottom water level of the land and this pipeline goes over many waterways and a lot of these actually are drinking water and it gets into the water and I also believe that the water provides about 30 to 40% of the irrigation in the United States so it gets into crops ruining farmland and ruining farmers productivity as well.
Last but not least it also invades on indigenous peoples lands and I think in my opinion they have been through enough but some people don’t seem to care at this point.
So basically it does not really create jobs, it violates indigenous treaties that we said we would not violate, it wipes out thousands of boreal forest land, it kills thousands of species of animals by decimating their habitats, it hurts American farmers when the leaks inevitably happen, it cost taxpayers billions of dollars for cleanup. it also uses a lot of petroleum to make usable fuel out of tar sand therefore increasing gasoline prices .These are some of the reasons.
Second of all they are not getting petroleum from this pipeline they are getting what’s called tar sand, and once that tar sand is sent to a refinery they use petroleum to refine it about 3 to 4 times more petroleum then would be used for a crude oil. Also it’s very difficult to get to TAr Sand And it is incredibly thick and toxic and the pipeline has already had 12 weeks that cost billions of dollars not to mention Tar Sand when it does leak sinks to the very bottom water level of the land and this pipeline goes over many waterways and a lot of these actually are drinking water and it gets into the water and I also believe that the water provides about 30 to 40% of the irrigation in the United States so it gets into crops ruining farmland and ruining farmers productivity as well.
Last but not least it also invades on indigenous peoples lands and I think in my opinion they have been through enough but some people don’t seem to care at this point.
So basically it does not really create jobs, it violates indigenous treaties that we said we would not violate, it wipes out thousands of boreal forest land, it kills thousands of species of animals by decimating their habitats, it hurts American farmers when the leaks inevitably happen, it cost taxpayers billions of dollars for cleanup. it also uses a lot of petroleum to make usable fuel out of tar sand therefore increasing gasoline prices .These are some of the reasons.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:16 am to BoneSpurs
quote:
as well as rail shipments
There it is. Lick Warren Buffett's boot.
This post was edited on 1/24/21 at 9:18 am
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:18 am to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Keystone pipeline is national security. In the event of foreign conflict we have oil supply from the NA continent versus a shakey middle eastern supply source. It would stabilize the North American economies for decades to come.
Mmm, seems like there's plenty of pipe for that. You can see Keystone would go right between two existing pipelines. Most of our foreign oil comes from Canada, Mexico, and Venezuela.

Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:18 am to Craig86
You hit all the liberal democrat talking points in one post
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:26 am to BoneSpurs
how does increasing supply increase prices?
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:29 am to Hooligan's Ghost
It’s Tar Sand NOT petroleum. The refinery uses petroleum to refine tar sand therefore you are using more petroleum then you are gaining from the process therefore prices go up.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:29 am to BoneSpurs
Now we know why China hacked and rigged our election or one of many reasons.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:33 am to Craig86
quote:
It’s Tar Sand NOT petroleum. The refinery uses petroleum to refine tar sand therefore you are using more petroleum then you are gaining from the process therefore prices go up.
But we will, by 2030, be importing as much of it pipeline or not...our transport costs will just be higher without the pipeline.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:33 am to 257WBY
quote:
Canada will now finish a pipeline that goes to their west coast. That means China.
It will go all over the pacific rim. If it made it to the Houston ship channel it was going anywhere and all over the world. Oil is a fungible product. If the Canadian oil is consumed in the US then other oil from the US and other countries will go to China. Where it’s produced and where it is ultimately consumed doesn’t matter.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:37 am to cwill
quote:
It will go all over the pacific rim. If it made it to the Houston ship channel it was going anywhere and all over the world. Oil is a fungible product. If the Canadian oil is consumed in the US then other oil from the US and other countries will go to China. Where it’s produced and where it is ultimately consumed doesn’t matter.
No shite Sherlock. Tell this to retarded enviro-wackos and moronic president who just killed US jobs.
If you were as smart as you think you are you wouldn’t be a flaming dim.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:38 am to BoneSpurs
God you retards on here have no idea how the energy industry works.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:40 am to Robin Masters
quote:
If you were as smart as you think you are you wouldn’t be a flaming dim.
Lin Wood level evidence and analysis. Now it all makes sense!
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:40 am to BoneSpurs
One question I have is about the Canadian ports. Are there times in the winter the ports freeze up and cannot be used?
We all know the ports in the Gulf of Mexico never freezes up.
We all know the ports in the Gulf of Mexico never freezes up.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:41 am to leeman101
quote:
Are there times in the winter the ports freeze up and cannot be used?
No. At least not the ones relevant to this discussion
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:48 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Now, it is going to go to China.
Can’t be stressed enough. Canada doesn’t like to do business with Chyna but does out of necessity. Especially when their southern neighbors screw them over.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:48 am to cwill
quote:
Lin Wood level evidence and analysis. Now it all makes sense!
I hope I am successful enough to one day donate $1MM to my alma mater and have a building named in my honor. Icing in the cake would be a nobody like you sniping from the safety of their daddy’s hand me down iPhone.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:54 am to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Also, don’t think Biden & pals are only going after the pipeline
Warren Buffet bought BNSF railroad. If be curious how much of that oil stop being moved is on those rail lines.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:56 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Getting it to market doesn't mean our market only. Getting it to Texas means the oil can be put on ships for the export market. Why would TransCanada want to do something to make their oil cheaper? We get the temporary jobs, they get the permanent economic benefit.
Too bad your sources do not reveal the truth. There are hundreds of full time US jobs necessary to keep that pipeline active and maintained. Far better to keep the oil in North America instead of being shipped overseas.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 10:04 am to BoneSpurs
Just follow the dollar bill, and you will ALWAYS get your answer.
Back to top


2





