Started By
Message

re: Why are we afraid of Democratic Socialism?

Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to
Posted by Dawgwithnoname
NE Louisiana
Member since Dec 2019
4278 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to
You want socialism, do it at the state level. That way producers have the option to move out of that state.

When the fed government is socialist, there's nowhere to run.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37791 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm not sure why I have to answer your point when this was originally a non-sequitur to mine, but point-of-service care in the US is superb.

So the healthcare you receive in a non socialized healthcare system is better than the healthcare you receive in a socialize healthcare system? Is that what you’re saying?
quote:

I'm shadowing a surgeon who is among the best in the world at two procedures, and thus gets people from all over the world, most of whom pay cash, or are paid for through their insurance programs.

So people come from socialized healthcare systems to pay cash to a doctor in America? What happens if America socializes healthcare?
quote:

US healthcare is good, and moving to a single system instead of employing four different ones would make it better, in both an efficiency sense and cost-saving sense.


Sooo... US healthcare is better than the healthcare received in socialized healthcare systems. But somehow moving the US system from what it is now, to a socialized Heathcare system will somehow make it even better?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

. But somehow moving the US system from what it is now, to a socialized Heathcare system will somehow make it even better?


Do you think moving to the Bismarck model of UHC is socialism?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37791 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Do you think moving to the Bismarck model of UHC is socialism?


That isn’t what you said, hoss.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

beerJeep


Don’t be too hard on him, socialists by their very nature aren’t very bright people.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73277 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:28 am to
You do realize most independent studies show a sanders style Medicare for all plan would actually cost slightly more than what our current system does, right?

quote:

In its analysis, the Urban Institute looked at all of the potential administrative savings that drive down health spending under a plan with one government payer. However, it found that savings would be more than offset by the increase in spending if everybody were given free health coverage with no premiums, co-payments, or deductibles.

As their report put it, "The increase in spending for people with this new generous coverage would outweigh the savings from lower prices for health care providers and lower administrative costs. As a result, total national spending would increase, even taking into account greatly reduced household, employer, and state government spending."

As a result, "National health spending would increase by $7 trillion over the same 10-year period, from $52 to $59 trillion."



LINK

Urban institute is a liberal think tank btw
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154879 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:28 am to
Do you think it’s another step closer? You people said you’d stop at statues. You lied. You can’t be trusted.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

That isn’t what you said, hoss.



Where did I advocate moving to a "socialist" system? I said that the US model employs all four healthcare systems, and moving to one single one would save costs, regardless of how that system was employed. My preference would be the Bismarck system from a provider point of view, and doing away with all public systems and the administrative overhead involved in each.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

You do realize most independent studies show a sanders style Medicare for all plan would actually cost slightly more than what our current system does, right?



I chose the Blahous study because of the prominence of the 32 trillion number. I'm familiar with lots of M4A studies, and my belief after reading many of them is that what we need is an expansion of the Bismarck employer based system rather than any more government funded healthcare, doing away with Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, Tricard and the IHS.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49153 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

US healthcare is good, and moving to a single system instead of employing four different ones would make it better, in both an efficiency sense and cost-saving sense.


There is no single system in the world that can replicate the US's point-of-service efficiency.

To suggest that the U.S. could move to a bloated single system with almost unlimited barriers for entry and maintain its point-of-service efficiency is ludicrous.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37791 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Where did I advocate moving to a "socialist" system


Are the systems you are proposing more or less socialist than what we have now?
quote:

My preference would be the Bismarck system from a provider point of view, and doing away with all public systems and the administrative overhead involved in each.


And my preference is to keep the best healthcare system in the world. The one that you yourself have admitted that people come from all across the globe to receive treatment.

The one that those who have the means from the failed socialist healthcare systems come to obtain their healthcare from.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Do you think it’s another step closer? You people said you’d stop at statues. You lied. You can’t be trusted.



Why do people think I'm a socialist? I'm not. I haven't even advocated for socialism in this thread. I don't think the election of Sanders is something we can't recover from. I think, if he were to be elected, he'd alienate a large portion of his base when he couldn't deliver on his promises, hopefully killing DemSocs, and moving the country to a more common sense approach. But I don't think he's going to be elected.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23218 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:34 am to
The government gets more than enough of my money right now.

If you like Marxism, then you break out your checkbook and start voluntarily sending extra money just as much and as frequently as you like. Don’t force your bullshite on the rest of us.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:35 am to
I always love the liberal argument that if some government is good or tolerable a crap ton of government is also good
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3945 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:35 am to
quote:

You vote yourself into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.


That is a great line - did you get it from someone else or come up with it yourself? Either way, it is genius.
Posted by El Segundo Guy
1-866-DHS-2-ICE
Member since Aug 2014
11446 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:36 am to
I will quit my part time job (partially retired) and shite can my small business if Bernie wins. I hate progressives and refuse to bust my arse for a smaller return.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37791 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Why do people think I'm a socialist?


Because socialist like socialist systems.

If the shoe fits, wear it socialist.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

quote:
As for any difference between “socialism” & “democratic socialism”


the difference is in the wording. that's it.

quote:
and “socialism” and “communism,”


socialism is the beginning stages of communism
Right. “Socialism” and “social programs” are different. We have to make sure and keep these things straight for our agenda.
Posted by Paul Maul number 37
Member since Feb 2009
1111 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:39 am to
In a world that presents one challenge after another to those of us who must live in it, how best do we find the real solutions to the problems we are faced with? Is the answer to any particular problem out there in the world somewhere or is it always at a mahogony table in Washington, D.C.?

Capitalism invites the real answer to present itself as there is a reward to be had in the form of profits. Socialism imposes it's own answer to whatever problem it addresses and that answer is rarely the solution because those who impose it aren't necessarily the ones with the correct answer. I much prefer that the REAL answer to any particular problem present itself from whatever source it legitimately comes from. Expecting those folks sitting at that table to know everything there is about solving a problem is insanity.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I think it’s the Socialists and Communists that have their definitions screwed up.
“But them!”
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram