- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are we afraid of Democratic Socialism?
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to DimTigerDontHate
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to DimTigerDontHate
You want socialism, do it at the state level. That way producers have the option to move out of that state.
When the fed government is socialist, there's nowhere to run.
When the fed government is socialist, there's nowhere to run.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:25 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'm not sure why I have to answer your point when this was originally a non-sequitur to mine, but point-of-service care in the US is superb.
So the healthcare you receive in a non socialized healthcare system is better than the healthcare you receive in a socialize healthcare system? Is that what you’re saying?
quote:
I'm shadowing a surgeon who is among the best in the world at two procedures, and thus gets people from all over the world, most of whom pay cash, or are paid for through their insurance programs.
So people come from socialized healthcare systems to pay cash to a doctor in America? What happens if America socializes healthcare?
quote:
US healthcare is good, and moving to a single system instead of employing four different ones would make it better, in both an efficiency sense and cost-saving sense.
Sooo... US healthcare is better than the healthcare received in socialized healthcare systems. But somehow moving the US system from what it is now, to a socialized Heathcare system will somehow make it even better?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:26 am to beerJeep
quote:
. But somehow moving the US system from what it is now, to a socialized Heathcare system will somehow make it even better?
Do you think moving to the Bismarck model of UHC is socialism?
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:27 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Do you think moving to the Bismarck model of UHC is socialism?
That isn’t what you said, hoss.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:27 am to beerJeep
quote:
beerJeep
Don’t be too hard on him, socialists by their very nature aren’t very bright people.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:28 am to crazy4lsu
You do realize most independent studies show a sanders style Medicare for all plan would actually cost slightly more than what our current system does, right?
LINK
Urban institute is a liberal think tank btw
quote:
In its analysis, the Urban Institute looked at all of the potential administrative savings that drive down health spending under a plan with one government payer. However, it found that savings would be more than offset by the increase in spending if everybody were given free health coverage with no premiums, co-payments, or deductibles.
As their report put it, "The increase in spending for people with this new generous coverage would outweigh the savings from lower prices for health care providers and lower administrative costs. As a result, total national spending would increase, even taking into account greatly reduced household, employer, and state government spending."
As a result, "National health spending would increase by $7 trillion over the same 10-year period, from $52 to $59 trillion."
LINK
Urban institute is a liberal think tank btw
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:28 am to crazy4lsu
Do you think it’s another step closer? You people said you’d stop at statues. You lied. You can’t be trusted.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:30 am to beerJeep
quote:
That isn’t what you said, hoss.
Where did I advocate moving to a "socialist" system? I said that the US model employs all four healthcare systems, and moving to one single one would save costs, regardless of how that system was employed. My preference would be the Bismarck system from a provider point of view, and doing away with all public systems and the administrative overhead involved in each.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:32 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
You do realize most independent studies show a sanders style Medicare for all plan would actually cost slightly more than what our current system does, right?
I chose the Blahous study because of the prominence of the 32 trillion number. I'm familiar with lots of M4A studies, and my belief after reading many of them is that what we need is an expansion of the Bismarck employer based system rather than any more government funded healthcare, doing away with Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, Tricard and the IHS.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:32 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
US healthcare is good, and moving to a single system instead of employing four different ones would make it better, in both an efficiency sense and cost-saving sense.
There is no single system in the world that can replicate the US's point-of-service efficiency.
To suggest that the U.S. could move to a bloated single system with almost unlimited barriers for entry and maintain its point-of-service efficiency is ludicrous.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:33 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Where did I advocate moving to a "socialist" system
Are the systems you are proposing more or less socialist than what we have now?
quote:
My preference would be the Bismarck system from a provider point of view, and doing away with all public systems and the administrative overhead involved in each.
And my preference is to keep the best healthcare system in the world. The one that you yourself have admitted that people come from all across the globe to receive treatment.
The one that those who have the means from the failed socialist healthcare systems come to obtain their healthcare from.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:34 am to roadGator
quote:
Do you think it’s another step closer? You people said you’d stop at statues. You lied. You can’t be trusted.
Why do people think I'm a socialist? I'm not. I haven't even advocated for socialism in this thread. I don't think the election of Sanders is something we can't recover from. I think, if he were to be elected, he'd alienate a large portion of his base when he couldn't deliver on his promises, hopefully killing DemSocs, and moving the country to a more common sense approach. But I don't think he's going to be elected.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:34 am to DimTigerDontHate
The government gets more than enough of my money right now.
If you like Marxism, then you break out your checkbook and start voluntarily sending extra money just as much and as frequently as you like. Don’t force your bullshite on the rest of us.
If you like Marxism, then you break out your checkbook and start voluntarily sending extra money just as much and as frequently as you like. Don’t force your bullshite on the rest of us.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:35 am to DimTigerDontHate
I always love the liberal argument that if some government is good or tolerable a crap ton of government is also good
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:35 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
You vote yourself into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.
That is a great line - did you get it from someone else or come up with it yourself? Either way, it is genius.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:36 am to DimTigerDontHate
I will quit my part time job (partially retired) and shite can my small business if Bernie wins. I hate progressives and refuse to bust my arse for a smaller return.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:36 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Why do people think I'm a socialist?
Because socialist like socialist systems.
If the shoe fits, wear it socialist.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:38 am to Choctaw
quote:Right. “Socialism” and “social programs” are different. We have to make sure and keep these things straight for our agenda.
quote:
As for any difference between “socialism” & “democratic socialism”
the difference is in the wording. that's it.
quote:
and “socialism” and “communism,”
socialism is the beginning stages of communism
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:39 am to DimTigerDontHate
In a world that presents one challenge after another to those of us who must live in it, how best do we find the real solutions to the problems we are faced with? Is the answer to any particular problem out there in the world somewhere or is it always at a mahogony table in Washington, D.C.?
Capitalism invites the real answer to present itself as there is a reward to be had in the form of profits. Socialism imposes it's own answer to whatever problem it addresses and that answer is rarely the solution because those who impose it aren't necessarily the ones with the correct answer. I much prefer that the REAL answer to any particular problem present itself from whatever source it legitimately comes from. Expecting those folks sitting at that table to know everything there is about solving a problem is insanity.
Capitalism invites the real answer to present itself as there is a reward to be had in the form of profits. Socialism imposes it's own answer to whatever problem it addresses and that answer is rarely the solution because those who impose it aren't necessarily the ones with the correct answer. I much prefer that the REAL answer to any particular problem present itself from whatever source it legitimately comes from. Expecting those folks sitting at that table to know everything there is about solving a problem is insanity.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:39 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:“But them!”
I think it’s the Socialists and Communists that have their definitions screwed up.
Popular
Back to top


0





