- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:21 am to TigerDoc
Muh constitutional crisis lulz, I wanted to see what kind of meltdown you would be having on this thread
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:23 am to TigerDoc
Are you going to disappear for months again when this doesn’t pan out?
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:23 am to Strannix
He just leaves and hides
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:32 am to Decatur
...democrats trying to create an issue when there isn't any.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:40 am to GeorgePaton
I’ve been trying to figure out why this is a story. Aside from the fact that someone was listening in on Trump’s conversations, I don’t see any bombshells.
Let me see if I have this right:
Trump threatens to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless they re-open an anti-corruption investigation into Biden’s son. This was after it was shut down by the previous admin/Biden Sr. threatening to withhold aid unless they fired the man investigating him.
Am I missing something?
Surely the SS would know if someone bugged Trump’s phone. Was it an intentional leak to get it in the news? Lord knows they weren’t going to hold Biden to account otherwise.
Honk Honk I guess.
Let me see if I have this right:
Trump threatens to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless they re-open an anti-corruption investigation into Biden’s son. This was after it was shut down by the previous admin/Biden Sr. threatening to withhold aid unless they fired the man investigating him.
Am I missing something?
Surely the SS would know if someone bugged Trump’s phone. Was it an intentional leak to get it in the news? Lord knows they weren’t going to hold Biden to account otherwise.
Honk Honk I guess.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 11:51 am to Lsupimp
all's well, baw.
Apparently I'm redpilling folks around here so y'all can all venmo me at your leisure.
Apparently I'm redpilling folks around here so y'all can all venmo me at your leisure.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
No response?
The president exercising article 2 powers is illegal?
I would use the words "impeachable conduct" to describe the hypothetical scenario
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:04 pm to bmy
quote:
I would use the words "impeachable conduct" to describe the hypothetical scenario
I prefer to use "bullshite" when referring to pretty much any scenario that you offer...
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:04 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
We seem to have elected someone who believes he's immune from oversight.
This is so nutty and contrary to evidence it’s staggering.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
If it Is your position that presidential candidates shouldn't be investigated by political opposition, then youre going to have a whale of a time justifying the last 5 years.
I don't have to justify anything because I'm honest enough to say it's wrong for anyone
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:04 pm to bmy
of course you would. Just like Russia was. Lol loser
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:05 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Hopefully, we won't see Trump refusing to obey court orders should they go against him because we'd truly be in a constitutional crisis at that point.
I hope we do see trump refuse to obey court orders from judges exerting extra constitutional authority. Otherwise, we’d have a constitutional crisis.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:06 pm to bmy
Convenient position to take today.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:06 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The whistleblower protection law seems to have not imagined a circumstance in which the DNI would withhold a complaint that the inspector general had deemed “urgent”. We seem to be having these assertions of absolute article II powers over laws which read that the executive "shall provide" x (whistleblower complaint, tax returns, etc.). We seem to have elected someone who believes he's immune from oversight. Congress is trying to get rulings in the courts, but they're slow as molasses. Hopefully, we won't see Trump refusing to obey court orders should they go against him because we'd truly be in a constitutional crisis at that point.
My God you are spectacularly delusional.
We just had someone who apparently was immune to oversight. That's why we're here now. Because apparently, straight up using the govt against your political opponents is DNC approved these days.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:13 pm to bmy
Should political allies only investigate each other? Should criminal and corrupt activity go unchecked until party allies are back in power to restore justice to their own cronies? I’m curious to understand how you think that might work. Hint: it doesn’t.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:20 pm to Vacherie Saint
This shite is going to be hilarious when it turns out the subject matter is biden's corruption.
I guess some foreign leader could witness biden kill somebody and oh boy, the president better not ask about it!
I guess some foreign leader could witness biden kill somebody and oh boy, the president better not ask about it!
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:26 pm to gthog61
They don't even want Biden to be the nominee. Now, they will eagerly rally around him and wear his corruption like a medal of honor because omb.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:31 pm to bmy
quote:Real convenient to have that position now.
I don't have to justify anything because I'm honest enough to say it's wrong for anyone
Kinda missed that stance of yours over the previous 5 years.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 12:42 pm to tigerinDC09
tigerinDC09
So, your answer is you do not know anything. Wow, just amazing your lack of intellectual curiosity and honesty. I know everyone on this board thinks you are just plain stupid but do you have to prove it post after post after post?
quote:
Abuse of Power (one of the articles of the Nixon impeachment) isn't actually a criminal offense.... That being said, it's clear that one party's floor is, what's the criminal statute? Not, is this behavior we want from a President.
Also, we'll see what more details come out but criminal violations can't be rule out right now. I'll wait for criminal experts to weigh in.
So, your answer is you do not know anything. Wow, just amazing your lack of intellectual curiosity and honesty. I know everyone on this board thinks you are just plain stupid but do you have to prove it post after post after post?
Page 19 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News