- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:19 pm to themunch
quote:
IS he saying he does not believe two world leaders but does believe some under cover espionage spook?
the transcript was released after the IG had already claimed the complaint was credible... the transcript was put out there by the administration, and i've seen nothing reported that says the IG had a transcript of the conversation when he did say the complaint was credible...
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:21 pm to chRxis
I do not know how deep rooted the infestation goes.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:24 pm to chRxis
the transcript was released after the IG had already claimed the complaint was credible... the transcript was put out there by the administration, and i've seen nothing reported that says the IG had a transcript of the conversation when he did say the complaint was credible...
That leaves us to understand both cannot be credible.
That leaves us to understand both cannot be credible.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:24 pm to chRxis
quote:
1st, the whistleblower isn't the one that finds anything "credible" or not... thats the IG... be mad at him for making that assessment... and 2nd, the complaint, not the transcript was deemed credible by the IG....
1st, the "whistleblower" thought it was a serious issue and phrased it as such. 2nd, the IG deemed it "credible" because of the info in the "complaint". After the transcript was released, the "complaint" is no longer "credible". Find another talking point.
As you are a pill counter, just look at it as filling a different prescription since the last one is done.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:31 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I guarantee you that everyone who matters knows who it was
The ones who need to be shitting on themselves are the “half dozen WH personnel with credibility” who fed this infidel this crap. He/she will have to name names and their careers are completely over because they are not protected WB’s but instead are witnesses.
Remember the Blasey-Ford incident where nobody she named as witnesses wanted any part of it...
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:32 pm to SundayFunday
The White House needs to ban all IC officers from listening into phone calls from POTUS with world leaders and other sensitive figures of note.
I have more trust for the inmates in my parish jail to not steal my car than the trust I have for our IC to not carry out acts of sedition against our President.
I have more trust for the inmates in my parish jail to not steal my car than the trust I have for our IC to not carry out acts of sedition against our President.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:38 pm to Sentrius
The way to stop this, although they won't do it, is figure out some charges and arrest this SOB. Then connect him to certain folks and do some more perp walks for conspiracy.
Mainly Brennan.
Mainly Brennan.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:41 pm to antibarner
This was all by design.
This was meant to, at the very least, cripple Trump's ability to conduct foreign policy. Unfortunately, the Democrats have opened the door to this type of tactic against a future Dem President.
This was meant to, at the very least, cripple Trump's ability to conduct foreign policy. Unfortunately, the Democrats have opened the door to this type of tactic against a future Dem President.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:43 pm to SundayFunday
Why do they have CIA agents at the White House?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:46 pm to themunch
quote:
That leaves us to understand both cannot be credible.
how so? the transcript put out by the adminstration echoes the complaint, almost perfectly....
the difference, is of the opinion of what was Trump's real reason for asking for the "favor"... some say it's a clear abuse of power and that he was asking for help with dirt on Biden for the re-election effort.... some say it's that he was asking for Ukraine to get to the bottom of their corruption within their country...
it certainly looks bad for him to ask, using the coded language he did, however there's still a lot of information that NONE of us have that will answer a lot of the questions that people have about the complaint and the transcript...
personally, i'd like to see EVERYONE mentioned, including the ambassador and the EU guy, under oath testifying...
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:52 pm to TidenUP
quote:
1st, the "whistleblower" thought it was a serious issue and phrased it as such.
agreed, but they aren't the person responsible for deeming it credible, now, are they? that's the IG...
quote:
the IG deemed it "credible" because of the info in the "complaint". After the transcript was released, the "complaint" is no longer "credible"
interesting.... did you watch the testimony today? maguire repeated said it has merit and is a credible complaint, and that's AFTER the transcript is out....
quote:
As you are a pill counter, just look at it as filling a different prescription since the last one is done
is there any way of discussing issues on here WITHOUT resorting to petty insults, when you have nothing left to discuss? some of us here actually like to just discuss the issues, and keep it on point, without having to venture into 3rd grade all over again with stupid shite like this...
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:12 pm to themunch
quote:
some shmoe was illegally listening and collecting info from those in the WH he was able to get close enough to to hear them in conversation. sounds like espionage inside the WH.
Every call that any president makes with foreign leaders is monitored and recorded.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:14 pm to SundayFunday
Holy shite. The person was a spy.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:31 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
But now they’re deeply involved in it, and there are no checks on their power. They can freely subvert the system.
Definitely no checks on them. Congress is scared of our intelligence agencies, so they won't do shite against them, ever.
Our msm won't touch that subject..because the intelligence agencies have spied on and went after journalists before.
Doj won't do shite..because they're part of the same permanent government swamp.
None of these top brass permanent government pricks are directly elected by the people, and they've more power than the fricking potus. They never have to worry about any repercussions.
fricking McCabe is so confident in his untouchable status, that he was suing the government. The sad thing is, I genuinely believe that a corrupt a-hole like him, will probably win that lawsuit and be awarded millions of dollars
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:32 pm to SundayFunday
quote:
C.I.A.
Stopped reading here.
Clowns in action.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:44 pm to SundayFunday
But...but Maguire stated that both Horowitz and the whistleblower "acted in good faith."
The latest embarrassing installment of "As the Swamp Slithers."
The latest embarrassing installment of "As the Swamp Slithers."
Posted on 9/26/19 at 6:08 pm to chRxis
quote:
using the coded language he did,
gtfo with that horse manure
Posted on 9/26/19 at 6:09 pm to member12
quote:
Holy shite. The person was a spy.
Yes
Posted on 9/26/19 at 6:10 pm to Northshore Saint
Read again
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News