Started By
Message

re: "Whistle-Blower Is a C.I.A. Officer Who Was Detailed to the Whitehouse"

Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:37 pm to
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:37 pm to
unbeknownst to White House that he was ex CIA officer and now back in ranks... how cute
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13505 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

This was done because of the previous calls to foreign leaders being leaked. It only gives certain people access.


Exactly the press is acting like this was a one off some sort of cover up. Its akin to saying, "the president knows he is guilty, he took off on marine one to get away", uh he leaves the white house most days on marine one, but dont stop them its germans at this point.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

This was done because of the previous calls to foreign leaders being leaked. It only gives certain people access.

if so, ALL calls should be on there, right? if not, why not?

i mean if it's so typical of a phone call, why go through all that to "lock down" the electronic transcript of the call, especially if there's nothing to hide and everything is on the up and up....
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90835 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election


Love how they state this as fact when it’s blatantly false
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

i mean if it's so typical of a phone call, why go through all that to "lock down" the electronic transcript of the call, especially if there's nothing to hide and everything is on the up and up....


All phone calls were done that way after the treasonous IC leaked calls with Mexico and Australia

Get ya facts straight. Thanks
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:41 pm to
if not, why not?


They discovered insiders were leaking info is why not maybe. Just maybe these insider leakers were looking when it was not their privilege to do so.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6859 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Exactly the press is acting like this was a one off some sort of cover up. Its akin to saying, "the president knows he is guilty,


That's why I brought up the point that instead of the WB having to testify, that Schiff will try and get the actual intel officers monitoring the call to have to testify.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Love how they state this as fact when it’s blatantly false

both sides are spouting a lot of blatantly false narratives at this point... that's why eyewitness testimony is crucial to this complaint now...
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:43 pm to
there is no eye witness to the complaint


some shmoe was illegally listening and collecting info from those in the WH he was able to get close enough to to hear them in conversation. sounds like espionage inside the WH.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 2:45 pm
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

That's why I brought up the point that instead of the WB having to testify, that Schiff will try and get the actual intel officers monitoring the call to have to testify.

as they should... they obviously wanted to talk about what was going, seeing as they told the whistleblower, so they should have no problem talking about it to Congress, IMO...
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60498 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:45 pm to
So much for that whole "The CIA isn't supposed to operate domestically," thing...
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

All phone calls were done that way after the treasonous IC leaked calls with Mexico and Australia

cool... then the electronic records of the secret electronic location should bear that out, correct? so let's go after those records to prove that...
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:46 pm to
Look up this is important.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:47 pm to
seeing as they told the whistleblower,

Now it is multiple sources...
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

there is no eye witness to the complaint


that's not what the credible complaint says.... this person says they have 2nd hand knowledge from WH officials (eyewitnesses), which should be able to aid or negate the accusations by the whistleblower...
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111595 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:48 pm to
Lol. But...
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64729 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:49 pm to
Prove what exactly??? Those involved gave testimony in person and on a national stage. Ignoring that is crazy.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6859 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

as they should... they obviously wanted to talk about what was going, seeing as they told the whistleblower, so they should have no problem talking about it to Congress, IMO...




Agreed. Unless the WB was set up just for this purpose. It's how you smoke out a rat. With only a few certain people with access to information, it limits who it may be.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23655 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Those involved gave testimony in person and on a national stage.

the WH officials referred to in the complaint?
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

if you remove the politics, it's pretty clear that this is not good...


Please explain.

If you remove politics it is our Pres asking for assistance in apprehending a felon. Directing them to coordinate with US Atty.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram