- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: While all of you were watching the circus, the DOJ removed 47K Epstein files from public
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:40 am to davyjones
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:40 am to davyjones
quote:
Of course that applies to anyone and everyone, as far as I’m concerned, on any topic of debate, i.e. a single reason why a particular decision could be considered legitimate, even if one doesn’t necessarily agree with it. Myself included.
So you want people to speculate?
No problem. Someone decided the redactions were effed up and need to be corrected for an entire 47k file batch.
It could be victims’ info that needs to be properly redacted because it wasn’t done so correctly. That would be a legitimate reason to correct an egregious mistake.
Or it could be they want to further redact names of certain people who are embarrassed by the inclusion. That would be an illegitimate reason to protect powerful people.
Or it’s some combination of both.
1
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:40 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
I hope you wake up out of your idiotic conspiracy
If it's such a conspiracy then why the deletion?
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:41 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Are you illiterate?
"Pattern Recognition" is NOT in your wheelhouse.
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 8:42 am
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:41 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
If it's such a conspiracy then why the deletion?
You can’t think of a single reason? Maybe victims names were not redacted? It is idiotic to think documents that have been in the public domain can be put back in the bottle.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:42 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Pattern Recognition" is NOT in your wheelhouse.
NC is a thousand times smarter than you. You’re making a fool of yourself.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:43 am to BBONDS25
quote:
It is idiotic to think documents that have been in the public domain can be put back in the bottle.
There are thousands of copies by now.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:46 am to AGGIES
quote:
So you want people to speculate? No problem....
...it could be they want to further redact names of certain people who are embarrassed by the inclusion.
That would be an illegitimate reason to protect powerful people.
There we go.
There WAS a reason. And it will never be properly or honestly explained. I suspect select files will also be memory-holed before most people can read all 3,000,000 files (minus 47,000) (or is it a total of 6,000,000 now?)
Posted on 3/4/26 at 8:47 am to Jack Ruby
Epstein files? Yawn
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:14 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
"Pattern Recognition" is NOT in your wheelhouse.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:17 am to NC_Tigah
the democrates are just doing a daily nexus trump/epstein search finding news mentions and reporting the new undisclosed by fbi numbers related. totally manufactured democratres bull poop
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:24 am to Jack Ruby
Only complete idiots are obsessed with Epstein
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:27 am to AGGIES
quote:
I’m just laughing about “transparency”
quote:
I’m sure they were downloaded.
quote:
“transparency”
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:28 am to AGGIES
I think some of you people just want these files for your own prurient interests.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News