Started By
Message

re: When did our culture quit producing men that would “do what’s right”?

Posted on 9/21/19 at 5:51 pm to
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21769 posts
Posted on 9/21/19 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

I'll take that as a win.



I know what it means when people feel like they have to declare that they "won" something.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71747 posts
Posted on 9/21/19 at 6:04 pm to
You sound like a kid who just finished an undergraduate philosophy course.

We're all impressed...
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26962 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 12:21 am to
quote:

When did our culture quit producing men that would “do what’s right”?


When "doing what's right" became paying half the cost of an abortion and maybe giving her a ride to the clinic.
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 12:22 am
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 4:09 am to
It really hasn't. For some obscene reason being a lying, blustering pos is "cool" now.
Posted by O P Walker
Birmingham
Member since Oct 2018
473 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:47 am to
quote:

caused by the baby boomers 


Go back and look up Dr.Spock and read up on him. Boomers loved his childcare books and its alot of whats led to millennial problems, and im an Xer.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 6:04 am to
quote:

can even point to Christianity's own standards and show how they're inconsistent


Go ahead.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34918 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 8:36 am to
quote:

When did our culture quit producing men that would “do what’s right”?


Like 'boiling a frog', SD...so slow that even the frog don't realize that the water is getting hotter.

Mother Nature rules...survival and procreation. Genes and Hormones guide the Natural survival impetus, with prevailing Culture not far behind.

Women - since they have had the freedom of choosing their mate, as opposed to the stronger male commandeering them - live and act via their Intuition; feeling-based. As choice will determine the relative degree of survivability and prosperity, accuracy re feeling-based 'assessment' becomes a critical factor. Women (smart ones) become acutely efficient in assessing the character (relative power to acquire basic goods and desires, loyalty factor, looks/aesthetic appeal re social status, feeling ability as such relates to their own, etc.) of the men on their buffet of choice.

Men are nuts and bolts. They deal with the workings and challenges to survival and prosperity of the Natural World. Men seek Power - as do Women who formerly did so via harnessing the loyalty of the more powerful Male, but as of late per the technological and cultural change, have become 'liberated' and acquired the ability to gain power of survival and prosperity minus Man. But like Women, Men also serve the Natural (Genetic/Hormonal) impetus to procreate. Men serve this Natural impulse longer than Women...for obvious health/survivability reasons. A 60 year old man could 'bear' a child with little to no risk...but not a 60 yr. old woman. Therein, Natural Selection/DNA/Hormones shut down the women, but not the men. Enter..."mid-life crisis". Problematic.


Per the above, Women are superior, feeling-based creatures. The Good Book even speaks to Woman's ability to "bruise the heel" of Lucifer. This feeling-based ability in no way negates their ability to rationalize and strategize their feeling-based assessment and judgments...for good or bad.

As the Human Psyche has become more complex, the complex feeling of Love, has become centrally appealing. Throw in the nurturing and mercy aspect of Woman from eons of evolution, and here we are. Think back to the Literature, Songs, Movies, Religious Ideas as it rules the Feeling-based Cultural hegemony. At what point did the word 'Love', begin to be central.

Bottom line: Men will act to please Women. Women hold the power to procreate (but not for much longer). As Women set the Cultural standard, Men will serve it; if or until the complex technological society removes the Woman's 'liberation'...and societal anarchy reverts back to the brute-force, 'barbarian' version. God forbid.

That said...I'm fine with the evolutionary transition toward Love (Universal version). And have no problem if it's Women who drive that transformation (knowingly or no). However, if Feeling (merciful Love) is employed in grand Systems/Government, minus QUALIFYING principles for subsidization...then society goes down. "Behold there is a way that seemeth right unto Man (Humanity), but the end thereof is destruction". Unqualified mercy is that 'way'. If Women do not realize this in regard to driving cultural mores, and acquiesce to the wisdom therein...they'll pay dearly...when society collapses and they have no man to loyally defend them with brute force. Low hanging fruit for the heathen they lent unqualified mercy to.

Enough!

PS...Fox News special tonite at 7. AI and the soon effect on jobs. Trump had better get on this. Like he don't enough already.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34918 posts
Posted on 9/22/19 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Correct. I don't own the child's life, but a creator would. What difference does it make that one's animated? Created is created.


Have you created children? Do you "own" them? Is it Objectively moral, for a Creator to "own" it's Children?

I'll define "own" as a Creator having Objective Moral Authority to determine, overrule and assert - against the Child's intent - the ultimate intent and condition of the created Child.

first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram