re: What, specifically, did Trump see Epstein do that made him tell Epstein to stop?

quote:

---

I don't hate him

---

Yes, you do. He was first reported in 2002. I would imagine people only within Epsteins close personal circle knew details. Trump said he had only heard. I'm willing to bet there were plenty of Democrats that actually KNEW.

Don't know when you were born, but the 1980's and 1990's were some crazy times. I can remember not learning about teachers hooking up with students when I was in school until well after we had graduated. And there were more than a handful of those incidents.

This is certainly one issue DJT had with him.

It was that issue and other instances where Epstein & Ghilaine were mingling at MAGO, and trying to recruit DJT’s high school employees etc.

Those were 2 issues that I’ve heard caused DJT to kick Epstein off of MAGO property.

quote:

---

It doesn't sound like you want a reason. It sounds like you want to argue. Have fun.

---

Arguing with people that have a perfect explanation for every thought, word, and deed of Donald Trump is a futile effort and the OP is learning that lesson

GM had hookers on Trump property that he expelled.

quote:

---

If you came home and told your wife that a friend you’ve known for 20 years was arrested for trafficking women, and then you said “glad I kicked him out for indecent behavior” at the same time she received a text confirming that you “knew he was doing something with girls“

Don’t you think the common sense question from your wife would be “what exactly did you see that made you stay away from him? What exactly did you know about the girls?”

---

This post just proves that you aren’t asking a question for knowledge but trying to drive a narrative. Your question has been answered multiple times, including links, and you ignore all the answers you seek. People like you will never be satisfied by the the truth because YOU WANT TO BELIEVE TRUMP IS GUILTY OF SOMETHING.

BOOM!

You assume that all billionaires are completely invested in each other’s lives. Trump had his own businesses and interest, not necessarily aligned with what others were doing. Again, he knew at least Epstein was making advances on a young girl, and that was enough for him to ban Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. That’s not a small thing. But on the other hand, that was far more than what others did. For example, reporter Katie Couric absolutely knew, after the fact, that Epstein had served 13 months in jail. And yet she still commented on the young girls at Epstein‘s house. But did nothing.

What you are projecting is that Trump somehow should have known in advance what everybody now knows afterwards. That’s just not reasonable.

Once again, the “concerned’ posters continues to ignore your post

quote:

---

Apparently you have not read my multiple responses in other threads where we should be hanging more on the stories and revelations of the actual victims. Which no one seems to do for some reason. Same as the sexual assault slush fund is a complete and total non-concern and a nothingburger. “Buuut we are concerned about assault!! Trust us!!”

If the obvious signs of this being completely being political and not a pursuit of justice is the unanswered, obvious, questions of:

1) Why was there zero concern for the release of the files the last administration by who is pushing so hard now?

2) Being that the last administration had complete and total control of the files for years… why wouldn’t they leak any damning information against Trump or any other Republicans so that they would certainly win? Why hold it and lose?

This is the same cabal of people that put together and advanced the “Russian collusion” narrative. You don’t think they would take a softball pitch like this and put it out?

3) Why the complete and total lack of concern of the associations and fundraising pleas between democrats and Epstein? None. Zilch. Using his rapey bucks to fund campaigns are a non-concern? Really? Using him as a connection to get questions to ask in a committee hearing in real time? How did they start their association? Anything? We appear completely unconcerned with any of them “burning”.

4) why have we gotten away from “If he has nothing to hide… why won’t he testify?!? Let him prove his innocence!!!” now when referring to the Clintons and their flat denial of appearing in a congressional committee? It’s proven that Clinton had a close relationship with Epstein. Why the complete lack of concern? I thought everyone needed to burn?

These are valid questions. And there are apparently few answers.

---

quote:

---

Once again, the “concerned’ posters continues to ignore your post

---

Of course they are. Their media commanders haven’t instilled that concern into their heads yet.

quote:

---

So is anyone going to ask him, straight up, what specifically triggered his conscience?

---

Google is your friend.