Started By
Message

re: What Really Happened to JFK His Doctors Reveal New Details of Assassination 60 Years Later

Posted on 11/14/23 at 10:07 pm to
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
4746 posts
Posted on 11/14/23 at 10:07 pm to
the following two videos are the highest quality and most thorough refutation of all conspiracy theories about the assassination that i've ever seen. the author leaves no doubt.... Oswald, unequivocally acted alone and was the only shooter:

part 1

Part 2


after you watch those two vids, even the most ardent skeptic will have to relent.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14897 posts
Posted on 11/14/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

even Trump was told it would endanger nat security.


This is what’s hard to figure out: what would convince both Trump and Biden? Except for threats.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15074 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 1:44 am to
The doctor who held Kennedy's brain in his hands - Parkland Hospital -

LINK /

Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5829 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 4:10 am to
He may have been the lone shooter, but no one has explained why a CIA handler befriended him a year before the assignation and got him the job at TSBD. No one has explained why this CIA handler was not called to testify before the WC. Likewise no one has explained his suicide shortly after being served with a subpoena to testify before the Church Commission. LHO thought he was on a mission for the CIA when he acted. The go between a were CIA handlers and mafia. The shiny hook for 60 years has been whether more than one shooter existed. No one focused on the obvious —one shooter with conspirators putting him in position to do the deed.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23786 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 5:00 am to
I always thought it was weird the Secret Service nearly started shooting to get Kennedy's body out of Texas and on the plane out of Dallas.

WHY was it such a big deal? The man was DEAD and a couple of days or so did not matter. They were hell bent not to let the Texas locals do an autopsy as was called for by law.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101748 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 5:52 am to
quote:

WHY was it such a big deal? The man was DEAD and a couple of days or so did not matter. They were hell bent not to let the Texas locals do an autopsy as was called for by law.


May have had to do with not wanting it publicly revealed how much a physical/medical/pharmaceutical mess JFK actually was, as much as anything else they may have been concerned with.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
4746 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 7:27 am to
quote:

He may have been the lone shooter, but no one has explained why a CIA handler befriended him a year before the assignation and got him the job at TSBD. No one has explained why this CIA handler was not called to testify before the WC. Likewise no one has explained his suicide shortly after being served with a subpoena to testify before the Church Commission. LHO thought he was on a mission for the CIA when he acted. The go between a were CIA handlers and mafia. The shiny hook for 60 years has been whether more than one shooter existed. No one focused on the obvious —one shooter with conspirators putting him in position to do the deed.


Man, if the CIA really wanted him dead they would’ve found a better and more efficient way to do it. There is no way they would’ve designed such a high risk plot, relying on one guy to make a bullseye shot. What if he had missed?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124365 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 7:31 am to
quote:

What if he had missed?
He did, or someone did. That's why you bring one or two others to the party.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13355 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 7:52 am to
quote:

his is what’s hard to figure out: what would convince both Trump and Biden? Except for threats.


You don't think that the public finding out for a fact that elements of the US government facilitated and covered up the assassination of a sitting US president would threaten national security?
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
4746 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 8:09 am to
quote:

He did, or someone did. That's why you bring one or two others to the party.


And there weren’t any additional shooters and all evidence points to that conclusion.

CIA wouldn’t be so sloppy…Oswald was not a trustworthy guy to put all the faith of your operation on
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
6925 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 8:27 am to
quote:

CIA wouldn’t be so sloppy



Have you ever heard of crack cocaine?
Posted by B2BWWchamps
Jasper, FL
Member since Aug 2023
652 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 8:28 am to
don’t ignore the timing of this information

it isn’t some coincidence
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14897 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

You don't think that the public finding out for a fact that elements of the US government facilitated and covered up the assassination of a sitting US president would threaten national security?


I think it would endanger trust in the deep state (for those who still have their heads in the sand) but Trump should want that.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124365 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 5:21 am to
quote:

At the time, the doctors hypothesized that perhaps a bullet entered at the front of the throat, ricocheted off the bony spinal column, and moved upward out the back of Kennedy’s head. At that point, the doctors were unaware of the wound in Kennedy’s back.
That gives a sense as to the trauma team inexperience. They were very young surgeons. They should have been suspicious of a through-and-through GSW to JFK's neck. Kind of basic.

They also had a second wounded victim next door whom Red Duke was attending to, and who was obviously shot from the the rear. Had they thought to ask, they'd have immediately searched for JFK's back wound.

Magnitude of events and inexperience took over. Had they correctly ID'd the back wound, and still assessed the head wound as a frontal impact, it would have made the Warren Commission BS much more difficult to digest.

A projectile entering the neck, then ricocheting 90° to blow the top of the victim's head, would be more magic than the "magic bullet." That does not happen.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27036 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Was the entire ER staffed by 25 year olds?



Probably.

1963 the ER was not a good job. You had med students and residents there along with people who came in being met by their own MD. Emergency Medicine was not even a thing yet? I don’t know when it became a specialty.

Every resident in the building was probably in Kennedys room at one point.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram