- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:38 pm to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:38 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Does our Government have to engage in an act of obvious cruelty toward this woman, or do we have the capacity to be a little more discriminating in this?
Is nobody above the law?
quote:
She's done what was asked of her".
Except have a legal reason to be here.
1
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:39 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Except have a legal reason to be here.
Again—the federal government told her she could stay
There’s no reason to deport her after all this time. Seems bad faith and arbitrary.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:40 pm to Pettifogger
Odd use of laughing emoji when backed into a corner is a go-to response here.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:40 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
There’s no reason to deport her after all this time. Seems bad faith and arbitrary.
She hasn’t been deported. She’s been detained. Maybe everything checks out and she stays.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:41 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Again—the federal government told her she could stay
They gave a stay in her removal order. Do you know what that means?
quote:
There’s no reason to deport her after all this time. Seems bad faith and arbitrary.
Granting a stay was a gift. Why stay the order? Not bad faith. Definitely arbitrary. You’re just in the wrong side of this one. You should be used to that.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:42 pm to Lightning
quote:
Sucks for her because I would assume her current 35 year marriage with a child is legit, but 1980s Donna screwed it up for 2025 Donna.
Absolutely moronic to reach back that far for something like this, when there are far worse people who need to go. But I suppose that is a reason
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:42 pm to Lightning
quote:
5 second Google search and it turns out:
quote:
Milne was divorced from the nonimmigrant student she married prior to 1983. She then married a U.S. citizen but we found, in our above-said unpublished opinion, that she had admitted that it was a marriage of convenience. After another divorce, she married her current husband, a marriage that is uncontested as "bona fide." Her request for legal permanent resident status based on this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage.
She tried to do a sham marriage to a US citizen to get her green card. She divorced that guy before marrying her current husband but our immigration policy is that once you’ve tried to exploit our system by marrying a citizen for convenience, you can no longer use marriage to get legal immigration status. Sucks for her because I would assume her current 35 year marriage with a child is legit, but 1980s Donna screwed it up for 2025 Donna.
LINK
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:44 pm to Chancellor
quote:]Pretty simple, really.
Pretty simple, really.
She isn’t here legally and she must return to her home
IF she isn’t here legally, she must return to her home.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Again—the federal government told her she could stay
There’s no reason to deport her after all this time. Seems bad faith and arbitrary.
Maybe she should claim she works for the hospitality industry.
If we got to her after all the people who've snuck in over the last five years, ok, but I'm pretty sure we haven't done that. People who at least came in above board and have kept their nose clean should rate a lower priority than Consuela who works at the chicken plant and got here last year.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:45 pm to 4cubbies
Dude nobody believes you’re a moderate when you advocate exclusively for progressive positions. It’s just silly and a very ineffective defense mechanism for you at this point.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:46 pm to Flats
quote:
Maybe she should claim she works for the hospitality industry.
Then she would be a seasonal/guest worker.
quote:
People who at least came in above board
Amazing to see you “conservatives” side with the lefties in wanting to keep illegals who lied to be here stay here. It’s almost like you just want to shite on Trump.
Morons.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:46 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Granting a stay was a gift. Why stay the order? Not bad faith. Definitely arbitrary. You’re just in the wrong side of this one. You should be used to that.
The things justifying removal occurred decades ago.
Just seems dumb. Should have booted her then.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:46 pm to SpartanSoul
There's gotta be some posters here who know these people.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:47 pm to 4cubbies
She has no legal basis to remain in this country
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:48 pm to 4cubbies
Hate to be that guy, but she doesn't live in Lakeview. She lives in Navarre, which we call Fakeview when people try to appropriate addresses. This is really the biggest travesty here and is certainly worthy of a deportation to Iran.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:48 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Again—the federal government told her she could stay
Not really
quote:
The Fifth Circuit upheld the BIA's interpretation, affirming that the stop-time rule not only halts the accrual of continuous presence but also prevents it from restarting after the commencement of deportation proceedings. The court emphasized that this interpretation was consistent with the legislative history of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) and the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), which aimed to eliminate incentives for aliens to prolong their stay in the United States to accrue time for relief from deportation.
She had not been here 7 years since her first deportation matter and the clock never restarts.
So that you can't do what she did and get asylum by just staying.
She tried to game the system, different ways.
Through a sham marriage, through just overstaying, and through an anchor baby.
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:49 pm to Flats
quote:
If we got to her after all the people who've snuck in over the last five years, ok, but I'm pretty sure we haven't done that. People who at least came in above board and have kept their nose clean should rate a lower priority than Consuela who works at the chicken plant and got here last year.
Pretty much where I’m at.
How about we focus on the people who flooded the border and commit crimes in this country instead of wasting resources on some lady who has been here for 50 years with the governments tacit approval.
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:50 pm to Indefatigable
quote:How do you know they aren't? Pretty sure that's the majority of those detained.
How about we focus on the people who flooded the border and commit crimes in this country instead of wasting resources on some lady who has been here for 50 years with the governments approval
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:51 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
How about we focus on the people who flooded the border and commit crimes in this country instead of wasting resources on some lady who has been here for 50 years with the governments tacit approval.
We deport criminals and the reactions are the same.
Actually, the wider reaction was much worse than this thread.
Also the story about her is full of omitting facts.
Kind of like Maryland Man.
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:51 pm to dgnx6
quote:
She tried to game the system, different ways. Through a sham marriage, through just overstaying, and through an anchor baby.
If she met with her immigration appointments as claimed…that’s fed gov’s fault.
I don’t oppose booting anyone here illegally. I just don’t understand why this person would be anywhere near the top of the priority list. There are tens of millions of people that should be higher on that list.
Page 15 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News