Started By
Message

re: What If Cures Already Exist?

Posted on 8/14/26 at 6:27 pm to
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1679 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 6:27 pm to
quote:


Sure thing. The end reference for all things is your experience and your experience alone. Cool.


You claimed nobody has it and you are obviously wrong. I doubt I am alone.

quote:


Yes, occasionally industries can do bad things, and at no point have those pharmaceuticals ever been held accountable. And they won't be.


Occasionally? It's constantly happening. What about the people who are having organs harvested while still alive? There is an entire abortion industry.

quote:


There was no change. The definition of vaccine has remained the same in immunology textbooks since at least 2007, which was when I gave up searching for older editions. What happened was the definition was updated to reflect something immunology already defined that way.


It was last updated in 2021 so that the jab could be included in it.

quote:


Yeah, the injury rate for the COVID vaccine was really tiny, but again, you know all, and thus, references to things outside yourself probably won't move you.



You claimed 0 previously. And the rate you are talking about would be the rate admitted to/acknowledged.

All for a virus 99% of the people survived from.

quote:

Lol. You think vaccines caused the autism? That is idiotic.


Do you know what causes it then? There is certainly correlation, and while correlation doesn't imply causation it definitely requires another look.

Yet somehow people such as yourself can apparently rule them out easily while calling everyone else fools.

I'd bet my left nut the cause is medical related.

quote:


No, as in accountability wasn't an issue for the person who literally led the initial COVID response. Why would accountability be an issue for anyone else?


This just seems like an odd deflection to try and make it political to excuse the medical industry for what they did. I'm pretty sure the same response would have happened regardless of who was elected, considering politicians are owned by the same people.

Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12764 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

This just seems like an odd deflection to try and make it political to excuse the medical industry for what they did. I'm pretty sure the same response would have happened regardless of who was elected, considering politicians are owned by the same people.


He sounds like a pharma rep.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12764 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

As if the Hippocratic Oath is followed.


It's no longer the Hippocratic oath...it's been changed to the "Physicians pledge".

snips:
quote:

Of note is that, in the modern version of the oath, there is no prohibition against abortion; there is no promise by the physician to “do no harm” or never give a “lethal medicine” as in the original Hippocratic Oath. Undoubtedly, there are many modern ethical issues today that did not exist in the past, such as abortion and euthanasia. The pros and cons of these two topics dominate our world today.

In medicine, the Hippocratic Oath for physicians was written specifically to prevent self-interested doctors from harming individual patients in ancient times. To better serve the present day needs and current ethics of physicians, a more inclusive pledge was written and adopted in October 2017. One key addition is “I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my patient" [6]. Also, “I will PRACTICE my profession with conscience and dignity” was increased to “and in accordance with good medical practice” [6].

These phrases offer an effort to address ethical principles that have been more fully included in two documents: 1) WMA’s Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [9] and 2) the Declaration of Taipei on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks [10]. Ultimately, the physician is dedicating his or her life and actions to the needs of the individual patient, as well as to humanity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755201/


This post was edited on 8/14/26 at 6:43 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

You claimed nobody has it and you are obviously wrong. I doubt I am alone.


Again, there does not exist this subset in a population that has 0 problems. Regardless of what you think.

quote:

Occasionally? It's constantly happening. What about the people who are having organs harvested while still alive? There is an entire abortion industry.


Do you think the entire medical apparatus has to answer for things that are already illegal?

quote:

It was last updated in 2021 so that the jab could be included in it.


I mean, that is what you want to believe.

quote:

You claimed 0 previously. And the rate you are talking about would be the rate admitted to/acknowledged.


What? I claimed 0 what? You need to reread I wrote.

quote:

All for a virus 99% of the people survived from.


The standard for a pathogen with pandemic potential is 0.1% CFR. The untreated CFR for COVID is much higher, especially at older age cohorts.

quote:

Do you know what causes it then? There is certainly correlation, and while correlation doesn't imply causation it definitely requires another look.


There is no correlation.

quote:

I'd bet my left nut the cause is medical related.


The likelihood is that it comes from you and your genes than it does from something exogenous.

quote:

This just seems like an odd deflection to try and make it political to excuse the medical industry for what they did. I'm pretty sure the same response would have happened regardless of who was elected, considering politicians are owned by the same people.


No, it is a direct response to your quip about accountability. You can't follow an argument to save your life, can you?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

He sounds like a pharma rep.


Dummy, I am a physician. I'm still waiting for these researchers you apparently know who found the cure for cancer.
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1679 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:



Again, there does not exist this subset in a population that has 0 problems. Regardless of what you think.


This right here might be a prime example of what is wrong with the medical industry. You're determined everyone is a customer.

I didn't need a doctor during that time and to say otherwise makes you a liar.

quote:

Do you think the entire medical apparatus has to answer for things that are already illegal?


I think they are examples that the medical industry is made up of humans who will do human things and people like you and others who try to sugar coat the industry are just propaganda mouthpieces.

I'm more than willing to admit that some doctors are good and things vary. You however are determined to put this entire cover over the industry to say it's all good blah blah blah. And anytime someone points out something that happens, well that's different and you move the goal posts.

quote:


I mean, that is what you want to believe.


No, that is the fact. The CDC changed the definition in 2021.

It was changed from a product that produces "immunity" to one that stimulates an "immune response". And vaccination was redefined from producing "immunity" to providing "protection".

That is a fact. And yet you are going to sit here a lie to say otherwise while at the same time claming your motives are for the benefit of others?

quote:

What? I claimed 0 what? You need to reread I wrote.


Ok, here it is.

quote:

There are none.


quote:

The standard for a pathogen with pandemic potential is 0.1% CFR. The untreated CFR for COVID is much higher, especially at older age cohorts.


Your industry pushed a shot on people of all ages regardless of risk on a virus that overall wasn't remotely harmful to people and over 99% of them lived.

There is no "much higher".

It was at best done for profit, at worse done for population management and testing in a planned event.

quote:


There is no correlation.





Now I will accept that maybe there is another cause and the correlation is coincidental. But to say there is no correlation is a lie.

Are you always this dishonest?

quote:


The likelihood is that it comes from you and your genes than it does from something exogenous.


Yep, it just suddenly appeared in people's genes at an increasing rate.

Again, just more dishonest bullshite. You are a prime example of why people do not trust the medical industry.

quote:


No, it is a direct response to your quip about accountability. You can't follow an argument to save your life, can you?


You mean the part of the argument where you tried to deflect the medical industry being held accountable because "you people elected the guy who was president when it started"?




Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

This right here might be a prime example of what is wrong with the medical industry. You're determined everyone is a customer.


Nope.

quote:

It was changed from a product that produces "immunity" to one that stimulates an "immune response". And vaccination was redefined from producing "immunity" to providing "protection".


Great. You don't know what these terms mean in an immunologic sense. Why don't you explain to me what the differences in the definitions are, using immunologic terminology?

quote:

It was at best done for profit, at worse done for population management and testing in a planned event.


Lol

quote:

Now I will accept that maybe there is another cause and the correlation is coincidental. But to say there is no correlation is a lie.


Lol. There is no correlation between vaccines and autism that anyone takes seriously.

quote:

Yep, it just suddenly appeared in people's genes at an increasing rate.


Clearly you aren't aware of a great many things. Add this to the list.

quote:

You mean the part of the argument where you tried to deflect the medical industry being held accountable because "you people elected the guy who was president when it started"?


Let's be real. You don't care about accountability. It's just something you want to use but don't want to see.
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1679 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:


Great. You don't know what these terms mean in an immunologic sense. Why don't you explain to me what the differences in the definitions are, using immunologic terminology?


Why because you don't want to admit the definition changed?

quote:


Lol. There is no correlation between vaccines and autism that anyone takes seriously.


Don't think you understand what the word correlation means.

quote:

Clearly you aren't aware of a great many things. Add this to the list.



There has been nearly 8000% increase in cases since 1986.

You're a fricking joke.

quote:


Let's be real. You don't care about accountability. It's just something you want to use but don't want to see.


You are the one that doesn't seem to care about accountability.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Why because you don't want to admit the definition changed?


Because you don't know what those words mean regardless of the definition. Thank you from backing down from something we both know you cannot handle.

quote:

Don't think you understand what the word correlation means.


You can correlate a lot of things to a lot of other things. Organic food sales are also correlated. The mere correlation isn't significant to investigate. It also purports to know more than just the correlation.

quote:

You are the one that doesn't seem to care about accountability.


Why would I need to be held accountable? I haven't done anything other than disagree with chuds on the internet.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
19100 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 9:56 pm to
As long as billionaires are dying of cancer at semi-young ages, we know there’s no cure for that type
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 4:38 pm
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1679 posts
Posted on 8/14/26 at 10:50 pm to
quote:


Because you don't know what those words mean regardless of the definition. Thank you from backing down from something we both know you cannot handle.


The definition was changed in 2021 by the CDC so that the shot could be called a vaccine.

Period. Deal with it.

quote:


You can correlate a lot of things to a lot of other things. Organic food sales are also correlated. The mere correlation isn't significant to investigate. It also purports to know more than just the correlation.



Thus the phrase correlation doesn't equal causation. As I said, I can accept alternative causes, but for you to claim there is no correlation is absurd and wrong.

And the correlation means there should be better and more attention paid to it, not people like you who refuse to accept it's even possible despite the correlation.

quote:


Why would I need to be held accountable? I haven't done anything other than disagree with chuds on the internet.


Nobody said anything about you specific. Just another deflection from the point because you're extremely dishonest and can't be trusted.

Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12764 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I'm still waiting for these researchers you apparently know who found the cure for cancer.


You asked for their names and addresses...why don't you post yours?
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12764 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I think they are examples that the medical industry is made up of humans who will do human things and people like you and others who try to sugar coat the industry are just propaganda mouthpieces


There are plenty of examples of doctors to intentionally misdiagnose for $$$...

Doctor allegedly made millions off fake cancer diagnoses
quote:

A Florida doctor stands accused of falsely diagnosing patients with cancer for profit and now he’s paying the price.

Dr. Gary Marder has agreed to pay the government millions of dollars after charging patients on Medicare who were not sick, WPTV reported.

Marder, a physician in Port St. Lucie, Florida, would wrongfully diagnose patients with skin cancer and recommend they undergo radiation treatment, according to federal prosecutors.

He was caught when one patient went to another doctor for a second opinion.
https://nypost.com/2017/02/10/doctor-made-millions-off-fake-cancer-diagnoses/

quote:

Dr. Farid Fata, a Michigan oncologist, was sentenced to 45 years in prison for fraudulently diagnosing patients with cancer and administering unnecessary chemotherapy, affecting over 553 patients. He was found guilty of health care fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, having submitted approximately $34 million in fraudulent claims.
https://www.today.com/news/cancer-doctor-gave-needless-chemo-35m-fraud-prosecutors-say-6C10913890
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
3713 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:16 am to
You goofballs who believe illnesses are just a conspiracy pushed by big pharma are idiotic lol I have personally worked with several doctors who have gotten cancer, heart disease, etc. and died at a relatively young age not to mention numerous wealthy individuals and politicians. Are they also part of the conspiracy? I can assure you if you have liver or heart problems, you will die at a younger age compared to someone who doesn’t have those issues. It’s a fact of life
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76850 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Also you realize these are not really impressive numbers, depending on the study design, right?

Practically everyone involved in that "study" was receiving some form of traditional/conventional cancer treatment during the study. Results were also self reported with no control or double-blind. A third of the patients dropped out of the "study" early. There's a reason the "study" was immediately flagged by the very journal that published it with that journal admitting that the acceptance of the paper violated multiple publication standards of the journal itself. The Wellness Company (a telehealth and pharmacy company) also used a pool of its own patients that it was already selling the medication being studied. That company makes a large portion of its money selling the drugs it was studying. No conflict of interest, though......right?

In other words, this followed the course of the majority of the "research" that The Wellness Company is behind, leading to yet another likely retraction for Nicolas Hulscher and crew.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 12:07 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:20 pm to
I'm not claiming I have the cure for cancer doofus.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12764 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:25 pm to
quote:


I'm not claiming I have the cure for cancer doofus.


You asked me to dox people by giving you their name and address. What kind of doctor do you claim to be?

Why don't you post your legal name, address, SS and blood type.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 8/16/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

You asked me to dox people by giving you their name and address. What kind of doctor do you claim to be?


I'm in internal medicine. And again, I wasn't the one who claimed these people had cures. You did. You are deflecting because the claim is suspect, and no doubt you'll hide behind some other nonsense.
Posted by bigjoe1
Member since Jan 2024
2115 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

An experimental personalized cancer vaccine from Merck
and Moderna
showed positive initial results in its first-ever late-stage trial, the companies announced Wednesday, bringing them one step closer to filing for approval of the treatment option.

The mRNA-based shot in combination with Merck’s immunotherapy Keytruda met key goals in the Phase 3 trial in more than 1,100 patients with higher-risk or advanced melanoma whose detectable cancer had been completely removed through surgery.
quote:

The initial data suggests that the combo could serve as a new treatment option for melanoma, which accounts for only about 1% of skin cancers but causes the large majority of deaths among them. Most recurrences of melanoma develop in the first two to three years after initial treatment and removal.

Melanoma patients are “stuck having to deal with the new gravity of that diagnosis and then undergo uncomfortable treatments like surgery, and after that, they’re worried about their cancer coming back,” Dr. Jane Healy, Merck’s head of oncology early development, said in an interview.

She called it “very exciting” that the therapy led to a “clinically meaningful improvement” over Keytruda – the standard of care for melanoma – and was well tolerated by patients. Side effects were similar to other vaccines that people typically get for other diseases, Healy noted.

The results also validate a personalized treatment approach that Merck and Moderna have been developing for decades, she added.
Moderna and Merck announce trial vaccine for late stage CNBC melanoma
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
28633 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 2:06 pm to
Chemotherapy and radiation just isn't good enough.

They are hard on the body with too many side effects.

If it wasn't for these trials, my sister would not be alive today.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram