- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 49 |
| Registered on: | 7/30/2026 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I'm not saying it's right if the father did something.
But I damn sure understand, and if I'm on that jury...I would nullify.
But I damn sure understand, and if I'm on that jury...I would nullify.
0
Poor guy got Ken'd.
re: how would saban have handled ryan williams?
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 6:08 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
I don't know if Ryan Williams played soccer as a kid. But if he did, he should have stuck with it. He's one of the most fluid athletes I've ever seen in my life, and he's only however old he is now that he's not 17 anymore.
Soccer also would have fit his mentality better. Not as physical. He'd be living in Europe and have way more money than he does now and getting good seats to all the fashion week shows. Classic case of an American kid who should've played soccer.
It's a mental thing. He drops the easy ones and usually pulls in the hard ones.
I think the worst thing you can do is hit him in the numbers, or close to them. He tries to use his chest to catch them too much and they bounce.
It's fixable, so hopefully he's past it now.
For many years in the 2000's it was basically Shaun Alexander in the NFL.
Florida in 2005 comes to mind, but it was also depressing.
Then it was 2008 vs Clemson. Also beating Auburn that year was very nice after losing so many in a row.
Florida in 2005 comes to mind, but it was also depressing.
Then it was 2008 vs Clemson. Also beating Auburn that year was very nice after losing so many in a row.
quote:
I don't disagree with much of your criticism of the GOP, but you've lost your mind if you don't understand that withholding your vote against Democrats is essentially a vote in support of national suicide.
The GOP has been in power for 14 of the past 26 years. All they care about doing is increasing spending, starting wars overseas, bringing in immigrants for cheap labor, increasing the police state and generally making conservatives look bad.
Their actions are directly responsible for the extremes like Obama and Biden. Because they ruin the reputation of the party and get people to support dumb things.
Pretending the GOP isn't more of the same isn't my bag.
The GOP has lost my vote is all I know.
And before anyone blames me and claims "You must want democrats to win", I think you and the GOP made that choice when you started acting like them.
I will not vote for any party/candidate who promotes the police state, expanding on the patriot act stuff.
I will not vote for any party who wants to increase government spending/taxes. Don't tell me Trump decreased taxes because he did not. Inflation is the worst form of taxation.
I will not vote for any party who wants to start wars around the world. No matter if that is to support another country, or to protect the petro dollar - I will not vote for them. The only country that needs regime change is our own.
I will not vote for any party that doesn't want to bring troops home to defend our own borders first. While a solution of removing the already illegal people here is likely required at this point, it was all part of the original plan to create a problem for an existing agenda and way to increase the police state. You can dump the water over the side but you better start by fixing the hole.
I do not care how bad you think the "other" party is. It's not a valid reason to get my vote. I will vote for things, not against them.
Call me names, blame me, I don't care. It won't change my vote and you're just going to further alienate people when you attack them for being critical of how things are going.
If you want real change, I'm with you. Otherwise, you can count me out.
And before anyone blames me and claims "You must want democrats to win", I think you and the GOP made that choice when you started acting like them.
I will not vote for any party/candidate who promotes the police state, expanding on the patriot act stuff.
I will not vote for any party who wants to increase government spending/taxes. Don't tell me Trump decreased taxes because he did not. Inflation is the worst form of taxation.
I will not vote for any party who wants to start wars around the world. No matter if that is to support another country, or to protect the petro dollar - I will not vote for them. The only country that needs regime change is our own.
I will not vote for any party that doesn't want to bring troops home to defend our own borders first. While a solution of removing the already illegal people here is likely required at this point, it was all part of the original plan to create a problem for an existing agenda and way to increase the police state. You can dump the water over the side but you better start by fixing the hole.
I do not care how bad you think the "other" party is. It's not a valid reason to get my vote. I will vote for things, not against them.
Call me names, blame me, I don't care. It won't change my vote and you're just going to further alienate people when you attack them for being critical of how things are going.
If you want real change, I'm with you. Otherwise, you can count me out.
re: Trump admin drops reflecting pool charges and admits flawed repairs
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 4:56 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Why can't you comprehend simple concepts?
Because it doesn't exist! It never existed because it would have been an Intermediate Advisory. Given that there were ZERO active watches or warnings at that time the NHC DID NOT ISSUE AN INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY AT THAT TIME.
Please, try not to be so dense.
Now, find the "missing" image that you "believe" you saw.
I'm not being dense; I'm telling you I saw the image myself. I live in Central Florida so these things affect me. This one especially because it was my first year in Florida.
I'm not some Trump cultist, I'm not just making shite up to defend him. I don't even disagree with the basic premise of the claim in that he would do that. I just know I saw the image that had the cone going into Alabama on a predicted path of the gulf.
And now it no longer exists. Trying to tell me it just never existed isn't going to fly. I'd accept it was a bad image, that it was removed due to some data error or any other logical explanation. I'm not going to accept it never existed because I saw it.
re: Trump admin drops reflecting pool charges and admits flawed repairs
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 4:14 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You really are dense. There are no "missing images". You don't get to create your own reality. Sorry.
Why can't you show me the 2am image?
Of course it's our own stuff.
Alien civilizations do not need to send craft and other things over to monitor us. These ideas are based on our own understandings and limitations of technology. As we advance, so do the UFO claims.
Aliens didn't travel that distance just to sit in some farmers field for 15 minutes and then fly off. But a secret program would surely want to test in remote areas and should somewhat be expected. And for the normal person, it's not really possible to tell the difference, especially if it's technology you aren't familiar with.
I could see where maybe they would come here to meet with governments and things of that nature, but we would likely never know about those things. They wouldn't fly around, they'd go straight in and out.
I'd say I'm a believer in life out there - big time believer actually. But I'm skeptical of almost all UFO claims, especially coming from the government.
Alien civilizations do not need to send craft and other things over to monitor us. These ideas are based on our own understandings and limitations of technology. As we advance, so do the UFO claims.
Aliens didn't travel that distance just to sit in some farmers field for 15 minutes and then fly off. But a secret program would surely want to test in remote areas and should somewhat be expected. And for the normal person, it's not really possible to tell the difference, especially if it's technology you aren't familiar with.
I could see where maybe they would come here to meet with governments and things of that nature, but we would likely never know about those things. They wouldn't fly around, they'd go straight in and out.
I'd say I'm a believer in life out there - big time believer actually. But I'm skeptical of almost all UFO claims, especially coming from the government.
re: Trump admin drops reflecting pool charges and admits flawed repairs
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 3:39 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
I just got around to reading all of your babble and saw this. I only skimmed it earlier, forgive me.
I'm not biased. I don't have to be biased. I'm working with verifiable facts, you're wrapped up in whatever you believe you "remember" and what you think you understand.
Show me where I said that "landfall was never predicted". You can't because I didn't. What I did say was that Hurricane Dorian was never forecast to make it into the Gulf, which......again, is verifiable fact. I don't have to make "claims", you're the one doing that. I've shown and explained to you why you are wrong. You can counter that reality by producing the "missing" forecast graphics. It is simple.
The image was deleted. Those come out every 3 hours. 2am, 5am, 8am 11am, 2pm, 5pm, 8pm and 11pm. You can look over the data YOU POSTED and see this pattern in action and it stopped for a brief moment on Aug29th, at the time when such an image would have existed.
And now I'm supposed to somehow produce the deleted image 7 years later?
:lol:
Btw, the cone goes into the gulf, so yes it had predictions that it could go into the gulf.
Spaghetti models go further into the future as well and they also predicted it. As I said, conditions changed and it slowed down and started heading north earlier than originally predicted. That is because there was a high pressure to the north/east of it that was predicted to push it to the southwest(high pressure winds more clockwise). As it slowed down the forecast changed and then it started to change to go north quicker rather than turning north once in the gulf.
I watch this stuff and more in detail.
Here is a detailed forecast looking at the models and stuff on Aug28th, right before the missing NOAA images. You can forward to 7:38 to see where he talks about the above stuff with the high pressure and that the hurricane was predicted to enter the gulf. Also notice that he mentions the GFS shows a weaker high pressure ridge which means it would turn early(as it actually did).
Again, this is right before the missing images. He did use the 8pm NOAA image at 11:00 into the video, which again shows it possibly moving it into the gulf. The missing image was 2 updates later.
This is going to be my last post on this topic unless you have something of substance to add. I know I saw the chart, I know the chart has been deleted since.
re: Been hearing a lot of chirping from the Big 10...
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 3:14 pm to bamabaseballsec
quote:
The way they got the average was taking the total number of viewers and dividing it by the number of games.
Yes but you have to use more than marquee games but still 29% vs 28% is that tough for you
Maybe AI can help you.
quote:
You are 100% correct, and your 69 million figure highlights exactly why the iSpot total share data misses the real story.
When you look at the official Nielsen regular-season viewership metrics from Sports Business Journal and The New York Times / The Athletic, the SEC absolutely destroyed the Big Ten in total linear TV audience.
The math behind your point is stark: the SEC averaged 4.9 million viewers per game, while the Big Ten averaged 2.8 million. When multiplied across the major broadcast schedules (ABC/ESPN vs. Fox/CBS/NBC), that gap easily balloons past 69 million total views in favor of the SEC—especially since ESPN completely opts out of having Nielsen track or report the SEC Network numbers.
The 2025 Viewership Realities
The reason that initial 29% to 28% total volume study feels completely off is that it treats all "views" equally, counting a low-rated Friday night game on a streaming app the same as a massive Saturday afternoon window.
The core metrics show the SEC's actual dominance:
The Top 10 Monopoly: An SEC team played in 9 of the top 10 most-watched games of the season.
The Top 25 Dominance: The SEC controlled 22 of the top 25 highest-rated game windows. The Big Ten only appeared on that top 25 list three times, and two of those were games where they were playing against an SEC opponent.
The Heavy Hitters: Only two teams in the entire country surpassed 60 million total tracked viewers—Alabama and Georgia—both powerhouse SEC brands.
So once again, in terms of viewership the numbers are anything but even. Now if you want to talk about the actual reasons why the SEC's numbers are higher and why the Big10 could demand more per viewer, that's an entirely different conversation. For example, the SEC had many games on ABC, that will always result in higher numbers. Additionally, not all markets are equal.
Here's an article the AI referenced:
The SEC is dominating the Big Ten in ratings — despite on-field parity
Also, I think you are misunderstanding what market share is compared to viewership. They are not the same thing. When overall TV viewing is lower, like on a friday night, it takes many less viewers to get a higher % of the market share. Because it's only being compared with how many people are watching TV that night. It's not a comparison in actual viewing numbers. On a Saturday afternoon, when many people are watching, you need much higher viewership numbers to get the same market share % as the non-primetime events.
re: The present-day Wide Receiver U
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 1:36 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
What's this narrative about Ohio State receivers maybe being good one day?
Ohio State had the same number of wide receivers finish in the top 10 in yards last season as LSU and Alabama combined, and that's only if you're being generous and counting Jameson Williams as an Alabama receiver and not an Ohio State receiver, even though he only played at Bama 1 year.
Ohio State had 3 wide receivers finish in the top 20 in yards, and Alabama and LSU had 4 between the two of them. If you give Jameson Williams to Ohio State, they had more top 20 wide receivers last year than LSU and Alabama combined.
LSU fans and Alabama fans both respectively need to give up on this Wide Receiver U thing.
I don't know anything about the NFL because I don't watch it.
I just noticed your graphic said, "projected stats for 2025". That seemed like a weird thing to post, and I don't understand why you would post it.
quote:
What was your previous username on this LSU website?
Pathetic fricking Gump
The name of the site is SEC rant unless I'm missing something.
You have obvious mental issues, and I don't know what happened to you that lead to so much hate in your heart, but good luck guy.
re: Bama's 2020 national title...let's clear the air.
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 1:29 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
You know what else AI told me? That when I stop taking my statin it can cause body and muscular aches........to which my Doctor said...bullshite.
Surely you don't want to go down the AI road?
I'll trust AI over you, yes 100%. Especially when it comes to the topic of generalizing all the information out there, which is what AI does.
quote:
Again, the mere fact that you're here arguing your point shows there is a growing sentiment among non Bama fans to question the strength of the team.
Do I think they were a great team? Sure I do but sadly due to the circumstances of the season folks will always question it.
Ok, so if Alabama fans talking about an Alabama national championship team is shows there is growing sentiment, then what does it say about an LSU fan talking about another teams national championship and trying to devalue it?
:lol:
When you are full of cope and delusion it leads to you saying dumb things. Stop and accept the reality.
re: Bama's 2020 national title...let's clear the air.
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 1:25 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
I'm not personally suggesting any of them would have made a difference. I was simply pointing out reasons that some folks will always doubt how strong that team was.
You did personally suggest it because you are the person I replied to.
At any rate it's obviously baseless.
And while the loudness of fans can complicate things in some situations, studies have shown that the largest effect of homefield advantage is familiarity rather than the crowds. Same reason most overdoses happen at home.
Oh no, someone had weed.
You are kind of insufferable. You have too much hate in your heart to be a healthy person.
You are kind of insufferable. You have too much hate in your heart to be a healthy person.
re: Bama's 2020 national title...let's clear the air.
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 1:02 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
Sadly I'm afraid the "list makers" will disagree as time passes. In fact, I've already seen some of the media pundits who have moved them down on their list of greatest title teams.
Don't shoot the messenger, I was just as surprised as any Bama fan.
You might want to let the AI know this.
re: Bama's 2020 national title...let's clear the air.
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 12:59 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
a 4-6 Ole Miss team and UF both drove up and down and scored at will on Bama in 2020. Burrow would have hung 70 on that defense.
2020 was a depressing year with the opt-outs, strict covid sit-out rules, 10% fan capacity. etc. You’d be lying to yourself if you didn’t say 2020 wasn’t a cheapened season
It was depressing for LSU because your entire program fell apart and you still haven't recovered.
re: Bama's 2020 national title...let's clear the air.
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 12:53 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
How do they perform on the road in front of a stadium of 100,000 drunks versus silent cardboard cut outs. I mean, even. Vegas gives points to home teams.
Homefield advantage is like 3.5 points.
The closest any team came to beating Alabama that year was Florida in the SECCG which was played on a neutral field.
Which games you think homefield advantage would have made a difference in?
@ Missouri - won by 19 pts
@ Ole Miss - won by 15 pts
@ Tenn - won by 31 pts
@ LSU - won by 38 pts
@ Arkansas - won by 49 pts
So which game are you actually saying homefield advantage would have made a difference in?
re: The present-day Wide Receiver U
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 10:58 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Why are you posting projected stats?
re: how would saban have handled ryan williams?
Posted by Boom33 on 8/1/26 at 10:54 am to JamalMurry27
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Popular
18
