- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Well Well Well, Judge Hannah Dugan Was Prior Executive Director Of Catholic Charities
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:18 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:18 am to LuckyTiger
Yep.. she's still ugly as shite in AI.
0
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:30 am to LuckyTiger
Catholic Charities is a domestic terrorist organization.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:48 am to Rebel
Oh you sweet summer child…
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:52 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Catlicks really are all up in this open border business. Why?
Catholics aren't. Just the leaders and their menions. Just like the USA gov't is corrupt and infiltrated by Satan, so has the leadership of the Catholic Church unfortunately.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:04 am to omegaman66
quote:
Catholics aren't. Just the leaders and their menions. Just like the USA gov't is corrupt and infiltrated by Satan, so has the leadership of the Catholic Church unfortunately.
Sorry, y'all... didn't mean to disparage any believers.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:05 am to SallysHuman
None taken.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:45 am to LuckyTiger
funny...she didn't look like that when she was committing crimes in her courtroom and in the courthouse. She was smug af. I bet she was thinking "but they told me I was untouchable". LOL
FK that pos bitch.....and here's to the domino's starting to fall for all these crooked judges. You can bet your arse that Trump is looking at the Judges that fricked him over already too.........the one I want to see the most though is the NY AG....or shifty schiff.......I don't know if it ever happens, probably not, but one can hope.
FK that pos bitch.....and here's to the domino's starting to fall for all these crooked judges. You can bet your arse that Trump is looking at the Judges that fricked him over already too.........the one I want to see the most though is the NY AG....or shifty schiff.......I don't know if it ever happens, probably not, but one can hope.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:51 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Unless she gets an insane, blue-haired jury, Judge Dugan is cooked. TEXTBOOK obstruction.
But she will probably not be convicted and that is horseshite. There will be at least 1 that will side with the dems, even if she had pulled out a gun and shot an ICE agent in the courtroom. For the good of the party. But, it could definitely ruin her career....which is a start. Here is to hoping they will convict her, and the others that I'm hoping follow soon.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:55 am to LuckyTiger
It was more important to her that she protect the illegal alien woman beater than to deliver justice for the woman who was beaten. And I bet she claims to be a feminist.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:02 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:14 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Is there a jury in Milwaukee that would convict her?
Milwaukee is deep blue.
Since she's a judge, I'd think she knows every prosecutor and judge in a 50 mile radius.
Wouldn't they have to move the venue?
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:19 am to 632627
Not the first one that I wanted to see perp walked….but, it’s a start.
Let’s get some momentum going.
Let’s get some momentum going.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:19 am to LuckyTiger
quote:quote:
Is there a jury in Milwaukee that would convict her?
Milwaukee is deep blue.
In Federal Court. Much less bias.
The Eastern District of Wisconsin will include prospective jurors (if a jury trial) from rural areas as well, meaning more people without TDS.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:21 am to LuckyTiger
Made my day w/. that mugshot. Those tears are especially delicious this Saturday morning.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:21 am to navy
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:32 am to Richleau
This is your reminder that "Catholic Charities" is not affiliated with the Catholic Church.
quote:
To the surprise of no one. Catholics…
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:40 am to LuckyTiger
My question is, "How often has this happened in the past - not only in her courtroom, but all across the country?"
You know Merrick Garden wouldn't have bothered prosecuting her. This probably wasn't a big deal for her, because she was used to doing what she wanted to do.
This is a message to other judges. She's probably going to lose her job and all of the trappings, respect, kickbacks, bribes, etc, that go along with it. Nobody will ask her to chair their NGO, going forward. She is screwed.
A judge who considers being able to flout the law a perk of his/her position, is probably not above doing skirting the law in other ways. Getting arrested for this, and one thing could lead to another if a prosecutor starts digging into their history. I'll bet their are a lot of nervous judges out their. Judges who will probably think twice about screwing ICE again.
You know Merrick Garden wouldn't have bothered prosecuting her. This probably wasn't a big deal for her, because she was used to doing what she wanted to do.
This is a message to other judges. She's probably going to lose her job and all of the trappings, respect, kickbacks, bribes, etc, that go along with it. Nobody will ask her to chair their NGO, going forward. She is screwed.
A judge who considers being able to flout the law a perk of his/her position, is probably not above doing skirting the law in other ways. Getting arrested for this, and one thing could lead to another if a prosecutor starts digging into their history. I'll bet their are a lot of nervous judges out their. Judges who will probably think twice about screwing ICE again.
This post was edited on 4/26/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:45 am to dragginass
1. **Annunciation House, El Paso, Texas (2024)**
- **Details**: Annunciation House, a Catholic nonprofit affiliated with the Diocese of El Paso, was sued by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in February 2024. Paxton accused the organization of “human smuggling” and “harboring” undocumented immigrants by providing shelter, food, and transportation to migrants, some of whom were allegedly present illegally. The lawsuit claimed Annunciation House contracted with a local company to transport migrants in vans, knowing some were undocumented, and refused to provide documents to law enforcement.[](LINK
- **Context**: Annunciation House has operated for decades, offering humanitarian aid to migrants processed by Border Patrol. It serves both documented and undocumented individuals, arguing that its work complies with federal law and is protected by religious freedom. The organization denied the allegations, stating it does not encourage illegal entry or conceal migrants from authorities.
- **Outcome**: A Texas judge blocked Paxton’s attempt to revoke Annunciation House’s operating license, allowing it to continue its work. Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso defended the organization, stating it serves “Jesus Christ in our sisters and brothers” and will not be intimidated.[](LINK
2. **Sanctuary Movement Cases (2010s–2020s)**
- **Details**: During the Obama and Trump administrations, some Catholic churches participated in the modern sanctuary movement, offering physical refuge to undocumented immigrants facing deportation. A notable case involved Jeanette Vizguerra, an undocumented Mexican immigrant who sought sanctuary in a Denver church (First Unitarian, not Catholic, but supported by Catholic advocates) in 2017 to avoid deportation. While no specific Catholic church was documented as housing Vizguerra, Catholic organizations like the Archdiocese of Denver’s Catholic Charities provided legal and social support to similar cases, prompting accusations of “harboring” by critics.[](LINK
- **Context**: The sanctuary movement, rooted in the 1980s, involves churches offering temporary shelter to immigrants with deportation orders, often publicly to draw attention to immigration policies. Catholic involvement has typically been through advocacy or support rather than direct housing in recent years, due to legal risks. Critics argue that even supporting sanctuary efforts indirectly (e.g., through legal aid) constitutes “harboring.”
- **Outcome**: No Catholic churches were prosecuted for harboring in these cases, as sanctuary actions are often symbolic and coordinated with legal teams to avoid violating federal law. Vizguerra remains in the U.S. as an activist.[](LINK
3. **Alabama Anti-Harboring Law Challenge (2011)**
- **Details**: In 2011, Alabama passed a law (HB 56) prohibiting the “harboring” of undocumented immigrants, which Catholic bishops, alongside Episcopal and Methodist leaders, challenged in court. The bishops argued that the law criminalized routine pastoral care, such as giving rides to Mass, counseling immigrants, or allowing them to attend church services, if the church knew or disregarded their undocumented status. The lawsuit claimed the law violated religious freedom by restricting Christian charity.[](LINK
- **Context**: The Alabama law was among the strictest state immigration measures, targeting not only undocumented immigrants but also those assisting them. Catholic bishops feared it would deter ministries from serving mixed-status communities, as even basic acts like providing food or shelter could be construed as “harboring.”
- **Outcome**: The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 ruling in *Arizona v. United States* struck down similar provisions in Arizona’s immigration law, weakening Alabama’s law. The bishops’ lawsuit helped highlight the chilling effect on religious ministries, and no Catholic entities were prosecuted under the law.[](LINK
4. **Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley (Ongoing Allegations)**
- **Details**: Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley, led by Sister Norma Pimentel, has faced accusations from Texas officials and commentators of “facilitating illegal immigration” by providing shelter and aid to migrants at the border. In 2022, Governor Greg Abbott called for an investigation into NGOs, including Catholic Charities, for allegedly “orchestrating illegal border crossings.” Critics pointed to the organization’s use of federal funds (over $100 million annually to the USCCB) to assist migrants, some undocumented, as evidence of enabling illegal activity.[](LINK
- **Context**: Catholic Charities operates respite centers where migrants released by Border Patrol receive food, clothing, and temporary shelter. The organization insists it serves only those legally processed by federal authorities and does not conceal migrants. However, critics argue that aiding undocumented migrants, even post-release, indirectly supports illegal immigration.
- **Outcome**: No formal charges of “harboring” have been substantiated against Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley. The USCCB and Catholic Charities USA have defended their work as humanitarian, not criminal, and compliant with federal contracts.[](LINK [](LINK
They sure do skirt the line of aiding without out right stating it.
- **Details**: Annunciation House, a Catholic nonprofit affiliated with the Diocese of El Paso, was sued by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in February 2024. Paxton accused the organization of “human smuggling” and “harboring” undocumented immigrants by providing shelter, food, and transportation to migrants, some of whom were allegedly present illegally. The lawsuit claimed Annunciation House contracted with a local company to transport migrants in vans, knowing some were undocumented, and refused to provide documents to law enforcement.[](LINK
- **Context**: Annunciation House has operated for decades, offering humanitarian aid to migrants processed by Border Patrol. It serves both documented and undocumented individuals, arguing that its work complies with federal law and is protected by religious freedom. The organization denied the allegations, stating it does not encourage illegal entry or conceal migrants from authorities.
- **Outcome**: A Texas judge blocked Paxton’s attempt to revoke Annunciation House’s operating license, allowing it to continue its work. Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso defended the organization, stating it serves “Jesus Christ in our sisters and brothers” and will not be intimidated.[](LINK
2. **Sanctuary Movement Cases (2010s–2020s)**
- **Details**: During the Obama and Trump administrations, some Catholic churches participated in the modern sanctuary movement, offering physical refuge to undocumented immigrants facing deportation. A notable case involved Jeanette Vizguerra, an undocumented Mexican immigrant who sought sanctuary in a Denver church (First Unitarian, not Catholic, but supported by Catholic advocates) in 2017 to avoid deportation. While no specific Catholic church was documented as housing Vizguerra, Catholic organizations like the Archdiocese of Denver’s Catholic Charities provided legal and social support to similar cases, prompting accusations of “harboring” by critics.[](LINK
- **Context**: The sanctuary movement, rooted in the 1980s, involves churches offering temporary shelter to immigrants with deportation orders, often publicly to draw attention to immigration policies. Catholic involvement has typically been through advocacy or support rather than direct housing in recent years, due to legal risks. Critics argue that even supporting sanctuary efforts indirectly (e.g., through legal aid) constitutes “harboring.”
- **Outcome**: No Catholic churches were prosecuted for harboring in these cases, as sanctuary actions are often symbolic and coordinated with legal teams to avoid violating federal law. Vizguerra remains in the U.S. as an activist.[](LINK
3. **Alabama Anti-Harboring Law Challenge (2011)**
- **Details**: In 2011, Alabama passed a law (HB 56) prohibiting the “harboring” of undocumented immigrants, which Catholic bishops, alongside Episcopal and Methodist leaders, challenged in court. The bishops argued that the law criminalized routine pastoral care, such as giving rides to Mass, counseling immigrants, or allowing them to attend church services, if the church knew or disregarded their undocumented status. The lawsuit claimed the law violated religious freedom by restricting Christian charity.[](LINK
- **Context**: The Alabama law was among the strictest state immigration measures, targeting not only undocumented immigrants but also those assisting them. Catholic bishops feared it would deter ministries from serving mixed-status communities, as even basic acts like providing food or shelter could be construed as “harboring.”
- **Outcome**: The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 ruling in *Arizona v. United States* struck down similar provisions in Arizona’s immigration law, weakening Alabama’s law. The bishops’ lawsuit helped highlight the chilling effect on religious ministries, and no Catholic entities were prosecuted under the law.[](LINK
4. **Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley (Ongoing Allegations)**
- **Details**: Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley, led by Sister Norma Pimentel, has faced accusations from Texas officials and commentators of “facilitating illegal immigration” by providing shelter and aid to migrants at the border. In 2022, Governor Greg Abbott called for an investigation into NGOs, including Catholic Charities, for allegedly “orchestrating illegal border crossings.” Critics pointed to the organization’s use of federal funds (over $100 million annually to the USCCB) to assist migrants, some undocumented, as evidence of enabling illegal activity.[](LINK
- **Context**: Catholic Charities operates respite centers where migrants released by Border Patrol receive food, clothing, and temporary shelter. The organization insists it serves only those legally processed by federal authorities and does not conceal migrants. However, critics argue that aiding undocumented migrants, even post-release, indirectly supports illegal immigration.
- **Outcome**: No formal charges of “harboring” have been substantiated against Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley. The USCCB and Catholic Charities USA have defended their work as humanitarian, not criminal, and compliant with federal contracts.[](LINK [](LINK
They sure do skirt the line of aiding without out right stating it.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:22 am to LuckyTiger
She can continue to practice her Faith as a prisoner in a Federal Penitentiary.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:23 am to djsdawg
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News