re: Well, here it is: Deal with Iran completed

I thought we were losing to Iran

Wait until you find out that there is an administrative fee for the greater Omani / Persian Transit Authority of the Hormuz with a 70/30 split in favor of the guys on the North Side. Meanwhile reinsurance rates on the tankers will go up. This will be an initiative championed more by the Omanis.

There is no finalized deal, but it’s looking like we’re basically going back
to the equivalent of the JCPOA…

quote:

---

SFP is so pissed about this

---

SFPDS

quote:

---

You lying mother frickers said we were going to pay them $300 billion.

---

No.


The Iranians who are half of the deal said that.


Trump could correct the record with a tweet but he hasn’t yet.


Hence why we have to assume it’s the base for the agreement.

FYI jd Vance just confirmed that the $300B is in the deal - and the Iranians “would have access to something like that if they keep up their end of the deal.”

So it sounds like it’s 100% part of the deal. What a shite show.

Vance said on a tv interview just now that the $300B is a "reconstruction fund" from the Gulf states and facilitated by the US. And that Iran will have access to it "if they hold up their end of the deal." No link yet

I can see the spin coming that "we aren't giving Iran $300 billion, we're investing!"

That's if this bullshite even holds up, because Iran is saying that Israel ending their campaign in Lebanon is non-negotiable and must be part of the deal. This memorandum is nothing more than the last 5 or 6 ceasefires we've had.

There is a faction of people, including myself, who don't consider the re-opening the Strait of Hormuz a win because US/Israel is why it closed to begin with--in response to our attack on them.

If Trump was able to get them to suspend their nuclear program as well, that's the only way I'd consider it a win.

quote:

---

FYI jd Vance just confirmed that the $300B is in the deal - and the Iranians “would have access to something like that if they keep up their end of the deal.”

So it sounds like it’s 100% part of the deal. What a shite show.

---

JD Vance categorically rejects Iran leak of 'deal', says no cash in proposed agreement
WASHINGTON, DC: Vice President JD Vance moved on Friday, June 12, to shut down growing speculation surrounding a reported US-Iran agreement, dismissing claims published by Iranian media as “fake information” and insisting that Tehran would not receive cash payments under any proposed deal.

His remarks came after President Donald Trump accused Iran of misrepresenting negotiations and blasted the regime as “dishonorable” following what he described as an unacceptable drone attack targeting Indian-linked shipping near the Strait of Hormuz.



JD Vance pushes back on 'false' reports
As reports about the alleged framework of a future agreement spread across social media and international news outlets, Vance issued one of the administration's clearest responses yet.

“I’m seeing a lot of fake information about a potential deal to reopen the Strait and end Iran's nuclear weapons program,” the vice president wrote on X.

He immediately targeted one of the biggest claims emerging from Iranian media reports that Tehran could receive financial benefits simply for agreeing to negotiations.

Vance quote from the link at MSN of all places:

“First, the Iranians are not receiving any cash, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting,” Vance said.

Instead, he argued that any future economic gains would depend entirely on Iran meeting its obligations under a final agreement.

“The deal is structured to ensure that the US and its allies concerns are prioritized and that if the Islamic Republic of Iran meets its obligations, then economic benefits will flow to them and to the entire region,” he added.

Vance's quote included

You are a fricking moron. We are not giving Iran any money. If they agree to the terms, they will be better off.

quote:

---

First, the Iranians are not receiving any cash, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting,” Vance said.

Instead, he argued that any future economic gains would depend entirely on Iran meeting its obligations under a final agreement.

“The deal is structured to ensure that the US and its allies concerns are prioritized and that if the Islamic Republic of Iran meets its obligations, then economic benefits will flow to them and to the entire region,” he added.

---

This seems like one of those "umm AKCHUALLY" snopes fact checks.

So they aren't receiving money for signing the deal, but they're receiving "economic benefits" if they "meet their obligations?" How is that not the same thing? It's just spin.