re: WATCH: Police Show Up At Woman’s Door After She Posts Anti-Mask Joke On Facebook

quote:

---

These Gestapo did not occur in a vacuum: they were triggered by criticism over these mask mandates.

---

And I contend they would have happened eventually regardless. Someone overly dramatic enough to call them on this would have eventually called them on something else. If that person has been in politics long enough, they likely have already done so and we just don't know about it.

quote:

---

You are simply splitting hairs.

---

Maybe in the short-term. In the longer-term I'm pointing out a pattern of behavior.

The OP posted another thread yesterday with a headline from this same website about a "confession" from a MI politician about the events of 01/06.

There was no confession (a confession is an admittance of guilt), it was just him being led through a conversation in which he ballparks his thoughts on what he thinks happens just as we all do. It was framed as this massive smoking gun and many here took it as such.

These are the kinds of bait-and-switch tactics LARPers use. They front-load sensational buzz words to gain attention, things that actually have very little to no contextual relevance, then switch over to the actual story while leaving the reader with the feeling that it's all dependent on that original sensational buzz topic.

As I have said in other posts, if she had said "yeah, garbage" instead of "Mask", the cops still would have shown up but we wouldn't have heard about it because there would have been no Facebook post with the word "mask" to underscore the "anti-mask" drama of the headline.

quote:

---

No, they were sent because she and some guy named Anthony were posting on social media about how they were going to trespass on a County Commissioner's property and dump garbage there. I mean, the officer states it right there at the beginning of the video. Youtube link What is it with you and posting these bull shite "stories" from this hack site?

---

Did you read her Facebook posts?

If you can't see she they were joking than I don't know what to say about you. She even put a laugh emoji on it in case there was any doubt.

Do you actually think they were going to dump "hundreds of bags" of garbage and "thousands of masks" on this lady's lawn? And they were going to conspire to do this "crime" on a public FB post?

The fact that you can't see the problem with several cops showing up at a house in the middle of the night to "tell" someone not to litter doesn't say much about your judgement.

No. And that’s not what the title of the post says either. If you have a problem with other posts from OP and their accuracy, that’s fine. You’re not doing yourself any favors with this throwing shite at the wall attempt.

So in all this, the cops have suspect #1 & #2 ‘IF’ trash & masks happened upon ones public property.
Imagine how low our murder rate would be if cops showed up at every door when someone says on social media “Ima gonna kill that somufabitch”.

quote:

---

And I contend they would have happened eventually regardless. Someone overly dramatic enough to call them on this would have eventually called them on something else. If that person has been in politics long enough, they likely have already done so and we just don't know about it.

---

You are a creating a false dilemma. Again, it is not a strictly either/or equation.

quote:

---

The OP posted another thread yesterday with a headline from this same website about a "confession" from a MI politician about the events of 01/06.

There was no confession (a confession is an admittance of guilt), it was just him being led through a conversation in which he ballparks his thoughts on what he thinks happens just as we all do. It was framed as this massive smoking gun and many here took it as such.

These are the kinds of bait-and-switch tactics LARPers use. They front-load sensational buzz words to gain attention, things that actually have very little to no contextual relevance, then switch over to the actual story while leaving the reader with the feeling that it's all dependent on that original sensational buzz topic.

---

So you have pivoted from objecting to the OP’s subject heading to objecting to the OP’s posting history? Congratulations: you just have used a bait and switch tactic yourself.

Within the space limitations of the format, the OP’s subject headline is wholly accurate. Any attempt to present it otherwise is itself an exercise in deflection.

quote:

---

Why does this even need to be said?

---

It needs to be said because social media is not the problem here.

You want the pain killer or you want to eradicate the cancer?

quote:

---

Why is en-volve.com is the only website you post stories from?

---

Why do you give a frick where he links from if it's valid and accurate?

quote:

---

Y’all still think law enforcement will be on your side when the shite begins popping off?

It will splinter just like the rest of the country.

The military too. You will have some commanders and soldiers that will follow orders from the government and kill their countrymen and you will have others that refuse to do so.

---

And as long as one officer gets shot and killed at every instance of trying to confiscate guns, they will begin to follow orders less blindly.

Good for her.

They know they fricked up, which is why those bitches rolled out so fast.

quote:

---

Why do you give a frick where he links from if it's valid and accurate?

---

Because it's not and it's not.