- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vivek Ramaswamy Talks Trump Indictment on CNN
Posted on 6/11/23 at 3:24 pm to Jon Ham
Posted on 6/11/23 at 3:24 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Funny all the Trump supporters calling this guy impressive while trying to shite on the most successful conservative governor in modern times.
That's because they don't think of Vivek as a credible threat in the primary.....
0
Posted on 6/11/23 at 3:37 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The PRA was written AFTER the espionage act, and therefore supersedes it where contradiction lie unless otherwise outlined by law. This was upheld by case law.
Yeah you're completely making this up.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 3:49 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Epic takedown. She was shook.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 3:49 pm to boogiewoogie1978
I was hoping Vivek would reference this:
November 9, 2022 - Biden addressed the
prospect of Trump taking the White House
once again.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we just have to
demonstrate that he will not take power by — if
we — if he does run. I’m making sure he, under
legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not
become the next President again.
I'M MAKING SURE HE DOES NOT BECOME PRESIDENT AGAIN
This is an overt declaration that Trump is targeted by the sitting president.
November 9, 2022 - Biden addressed the
prospect of Trump taking the White House
once again.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we just have to
demonstrate that he will not take power by — if
we — if he does run. I’m making sure he, under
legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not
become the next President again.
I'M MAKING SURE HE DOES NOT BECOME PRESIDENT AGAIN
This is an overt declaration that Trump is targeted by the sitting president.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 4:45 pm to Decatur
I gave you an example dumb shite. You want more?
Posted on 6/11/23 at 4:53 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Funny all the Trump supporters calling this guy impressive while trying to shite on the most successful conservative governor in modern times.
None are, he is a fake a spoiler, the GOPe's last ditch effort if DeSantis doesn't take out Trump.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 4:55 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I gave you an example dumb shite.
quote:
the Clinton sock drawer case
Has nothing to do with this criminal case.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 5:01 pm to Decatur
quote:
Yeah you're completely making this up
Where did you go to law school?
Posted on 6/11/23 at 5:10 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Dana Bash is lying. She stated that there is no evidence that Biden has anything to do with Trump's indictment.
It has come out that Biden signed off on cutting off Trump from his clearance as a former President-which enabled the raid of a former President. It also came out that Biden told Garland to get the son of a bitch Trump.
What Dana knows is that the DOJ NSD answers to no one. They have no oversight. So the politicization of the DOJ & Biden towards Trump is as safe as a bear cub by it's mama.
The only way to PROVE it is political is the DOJ NSD questioning themselves.
An FBI agent said that the DOJ NSD ran the Trump raid way below standards. They are Biden and the establishments personal stasi's.
Until the DOJ NSD is dismantled nothing will happen and Trump could easily go to prison.
They will never be dismantled because via GWBush & Obama they were created under the guise of the war on terror.
The democrats don't care that the terrorists are now the political opponents of democrats.
It has come out that Biden signed off on cutting off Trump from his clearance as a former President-which enabled the raid of a former President. It also came out that Biden told Garland to get the son of a bitch Trump.
What Dana knows is that the DOJ NSD answers to no one. They have no oversight. So the politicization of the DOJ & Biden towards Trump is as safe as a bear cub by it's mama.
The only way to PROVE it is political is the DOJ NSD questioning themselves.
An FBI agent said that the DOJ NSD ran the Trump raid way below standards. They are Biden and the establishments personal stasi's.
Until the DOJ NSD is dismantled nothing will happen and Trump could easily go to prison.
They will never be dismantled because via GWBush & Obama they were created under the guise of the war on terror.
The democrats don't care that the terrorists are now the political opponents of democrats.
This post was edited on 6/11/23 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 6/11/23 at 5:10 pm to Decatur
I’m not talking about that idiot. I’m talking about the abortion/infanticide legal comparison. And the Clinton Sock drawer case will 100% be cited if this goes to trial. I’m willing to ban bet you over it.
ETA:
In the ruling where the prosecution argued that Clinton’s tapes contained classified material, Clinton argued they were personal. It’s the presidents sole discretion to decide what’s personal and what’s presidential, even if it’s potentially classified material. Judge Jackson agreed with Clinton.
The ruling judge:
ETA:
In the ruling where the prosecution argued that Clinton’s tapes contained classified material, Clinton argued they were personal. It’s the presidents sole discretion to decide what’s personal and what’s presidential, even if it’s potentially classified material. Judge Jackson agreed with Clinton.
The ruling judge:
quote:
“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
This post was edited on 6/11/23 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 6/11/23 at 5:11 pm to BBONDS25
I don’t give out personal information here.
Do you have anything to add to the discussion?
Do you have anything to add to the discussion?
Posted on 6/11/23 at 5:12 pm to Decatur
What are you adding? Nothing as usual. You aren’t making arguments. You are just nipping at heels.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 6:06 pm to Decatur
quote:
I don’t give out personal information here. Do you have anything to add to the discussion?
Yes. Your legal analysis is awful. I just wanted to point out you’re not a lawyer…and your analysis is bad. Kind of like your take on the Russia stuff. You know?
This post was edited on 6/11/23 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 6/11/23 at 6:10 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
boogiewoogie1978
Fox links. At least label them.Posted on 6/11/23 at 7:29 pm to Leto II
quote:
The hell he did Surely you don’t believe this
Of course he did. Negotiating isn’t being uncooperative. Clearly you’ve never been part of a negotiation. Which makes sense. Considering your posts.
quote:
Sure thing champ
Making light and laughing at the weaponization of government against political opponents only confirms what a piece of shot human you are.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 7:48 pm to boogiewoogie1978
wow, I listened to the interview, I would place Vivek third in line for the nomination behind Trump and Dsantos
Vivek is a good guy
Vivek is a good guy
Posted on 6/11/23 at 7:51 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
trying to shite on the most successful conservative governor in modern times.
Who is talking shite about Kay Ivey?
Posted on 6/11/23 at 8:03 pm to Leto II
quote:because you support it?
As for the bribery, if they have evidence, you control the house. Impeach him.
Scumbag.
Posted on 6/11/23 at 8:19 pm to boogiewoogie1978
“We know how to be good journalists bc we do it every night”
Holy fricking shite
Holy fricking shite
Posted on 6/11/23 at 8:21 pm to CelticDog
This is proof positive of your retardation.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News