Started By
Message

re: Vivek Ramaswamy has star power unlike any other recent VP candidate

Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
2421 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Its just the last few we turned leftward and gave up on the values that separated us from the other guys.

We've always been the anchor to keep it from running away. Thats about all "we" an do.


No, it's just that in the last few years you have been exposed at being part of the uni-party.

To call the GOPe an anchor, than it's another 30 year failed anchor.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:06 pm to
They fail to understand the party of old has been drastically transformed.

To those pointing to the Paul ryans of the world, I ask you, what good is compromise when the end result is negative?
Posted by FLTech
the A
Member since Sep 2017
12447 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:15 pm to
I’m a huge Vivek fan. He’s a rockstar
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63540 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:17 pm to
Honestly, most people tend to laugh at Vivek.
Posted by lsuguy84
CO
Member since Feb 2009
19661 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Honestly, most people tend to laugh at Vivek


Posted by RammerJammer91
Member since Jan 2016
5172 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:19 pm to
Vivek sided with the media on "Don't Say Gay" by advocating for teaching 8 year-old children about sex in the classroom and he celebrated the farce that is Juneteenth.

He's a RINO, not a conservative. My goodness, it's embarrassing how many people in this party view politics like WWE.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37641 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

We got us a real sheep here folks.





You really think Trump had a fricking clue about judicial nominations?.....or a mastery of the nuances of tax policy? He certainly had principled beliefs and some understating of tax and was smart enough to listen to Ryan and McConnell but it was those guys who had the legislation teed up and ready to go and they whipped up the votes....the tax reform deal had been on dock for years.....the judges had been identified for years.......Trump had frick all to do with it except rubber stamp it.....which he did to his credit.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 8:25 pm
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
2421 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:26 pm to
Are you a fed? You talk like one.


Either way, you are a minority on the right. Your side had 30 years, times up.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:26 pm to
I’ll hand it to McConnell on judges but hey, we had the numbers. Trump wasn’t shy about his plans with the Supreme Court and the Fed judges. guys like Ryan are the reason more conservative policy wasn’t enacted. Hell, we still have Obamacare because of folks like him and McCain. So please spare me the theatrics. Now, read Vivek’s policy.

America first 2.0

Please. Educate yourself.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81827 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

That SirWinston supports such an obvious huckster with hiphuckster style is maybe a little less surprising than the maga weirdos full throated embrace of the TikTok flip flop.





Lofty snark, mate. Well done.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23725 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Vivek Ramaswamy has star power unlike

Is this satire?
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37641 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:48 pm to
quote:


Please. Educate yourself.


Trump was the leader of the Party. It's his responsibility to get it over the line.

Trump has no capacity for building coalitions or consensus. As in none.....
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:03 pm to
And my question to you is, if coalition and consensus ends with bipartisan bills that erode citizens’ rights like the patriot act, then what good is coalition and consensus?

Look, guys like McConnell, McCarthy, Ryan, etc are out. The future is a changing party back to more conservative principle that is bound by the constitution and seeks to neuter and reduce the federal government. Why would you be opposed to that?
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
6021 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:07 pm to
Who?
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37641 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Look, guys like McConnell, McCarthy, Ryan, etc are out. The future is a changing party back to more conservative principle that is bound by the constitution and seeks to neuter and reduce the federal government. Why would you be opposed to that?




I am not opposed to it in theory but what you guys can't seem to grasp are these so-called RINO types are an important block. They are conservative but skew heavily to the middle and are more vanilla in their politics. Not everyone is a Trump accolyte and fire breathing MAGA,,,,,even conservative states keep sending these people to Congress. Again - there are probably something like a dozen of these people in the Senate and they are power centers unto themselves. They are only responsible to their constituents and don't have to listen to you or Trump for that matter. You have to try and co-opt them to your side and Trump has done a horrible job at it. It's why the Republicans can't win shite. Do you think the Democrat rank and file like Joe Biden? They fricking despise him yet they consistently line up behind him because they know that Biden will at least deliver for them. Republicans won't do that for Trump because he makes enemies out of everyone.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 9:16 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260681 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

more conservative principle that is bound by the constitution and seeks to neuter and reduce the federal government.


Not if the evidence is Dons first term. He is all in on activist government.

His economics have more central planning than Bill Clintons.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:22 pm to
So the net result is the federal government doing less by not capitulating. I fail to see that as a bad result. The younger faces you see over and over, guys like Mike Johnson, are the face of the party now. That trend will continue. No need to go back to failed policy trumpeted by the party of old.

Results matter and people are starved for a better path forward. Vivek is the perfect conduit for all this. He’s young, he can clearly explain complicated conservative issues, and most importantly, the policies he supports are drastic changes backed by constitutional power that seek to limit the power and scope of the federal government.

As opposed to the Republican Party of old that passed the patriot act and created even more federal government.

I understand your fear of trying something new but can you not see where the wind is blowing? Now please take the time to read his policies. Its dire you understand them.

To your point about the democrats. You’re right, they support Biden even if they hate them, so why then do we have never trumpers backed by Bush and co? Seems to me your ire should be with them and not the new direction of the Republican Party which should be called the America First party, right?
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 9:33 pm
Posted by Slim
Poplarville, Mississippi
Member since Sep 2006
2492 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:28 pm to
The dude is a snake, don’t be deceived.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10434 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:31 pm to
Trump will not ever allow someone with the skills of Vivek to be VP. Vivek is an alpha.

Trump will always take a more beta candidate. He will not ever accept the possibility of being made to look inferior.


Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37641 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

understand your fear of trying something new but can you not see where the wind is blowing? Now please take the time to read his policies. Its dire you understand them.




You guys have your heads in the clouds and you are completely missing the point

Here is the reality: Assuming a Trump win and things really go well down ballot, at best he gets a slim majority in similar to 2016.....I doubt it but let's assume the best outcome. So what happens next? The reality is that Trump is already a one term lame duck President that has a two year window at best to effect any meaningful sort of change that can't be undone by EO and overturned by the next Democrat. So explain to me how he accomplishes that given the dynamics and power balance in the Senate remains more or les the same. How does Trump accomplish anything without the backing of these so-calle Establishment RINOS you hate so much?

Tell me how he does it? Because they don't give a frick about Trump and there is likely as much political upside to turning their backs on him a there is working with him. How is Trump going to push a legislative agenda through Congress without their support. Spare me your aspirational hopes an dreams because I am talking realpolitik and what the political reality and make-up of Congress will be in 2025.

This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 9:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram