Started By
Message

re: Vivek Ramaswamy has star power unlike any other recent VP candidate

Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:39 pm to
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:39 pm to
I’m attempting to do that but you won’t open the damn link I sent you. If my head is in the clouds, your head is in the sand.

Vivek lays it all out there for ya. And again, it sounds like your ire is with the more moderate never trumpers than with Vivek or Mike Johnson or Byron Donalds or Trump. Hell, even Desantis! Come on man. Read the policy and your fear of the unknown will wash away. Can you please do that for me? You clearly are knowledgeable and care so just go a little bit further and educate yourself. It’ll do you a world of good.

America First 2.0
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4330 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

The younger faces you see over and over, guys like Mike Johnson, are the face of the party now. That trend will continue. No need to go back to failed policy trumpeted by the party of old.


There's absolutely zero difference between Mike Johnson and "the party of old".

quote:

Vivek...the policies he supports


The policies Vivek supports change constantly.

quote:

so why then do we have never trumpers backed by Bush and co? Seems to me your ire should be with them and not the new direction of the Republican Party which should be called the America First party, right?


You guys are delusional. The party isn't changing at all. You just like the guy leading the party now so you're willing to overlook all of his GOPe/RINO tendencies.

Trump himself just backed an establishment, Patriot Act RINO.

Trump, Graham and Johnson are working together to get $60-90 Billion sent to Ukraine.

Trump is floating major establishment donors as Treasury Secretary.

The RINOs won. They have a firmer grasp on the party now and they have the backing of the so-called "America First" coalition.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 9:55 pm to
McCarthy would have rubber stamped that border bill and you know it. Single appropriation bills, hefty debate, and a turning away from omnibus bills doesn't sound anything like "the party of old." Romney is gone, McCarthy is gone, Cantor is gone, Ryan is gone, etc. the party has shifted and no the GOPe hasn't won. The only reason it's taken this long is because we have to drag the Bush acolytes, butthurt over Jeb's trouncing, kicking and screaming. It's absurd.

So just checking to see how this whole winning thing jives with ya. The leader of the party is America First, the speaker of the house is America First, several republican senators are America First, several fresh faces in congress are America First. Hell, Matt Gaetz ushered in the defeat of McCarthy and well, he's...uh, America First.

So how is that winning? And you call me delusional?

Quick question to the both of you, how old are you? I'm guessing Dubya wasn't the first president you voted for.

Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4330 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

the speaker of the house is America First


He just worked with Democrats to get his spending bill past the more conservative members of the House.

5 things to know about Speaker Johnson’s spending deal with Democrats

quote:

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is facing heat from his party’s right flank after striking a deal with Democrats on government funding that conservative hard-liners are already dismissing as a “total failure.”


quote:

“Don’t be fooled. The DC Uniparty’s spending ‘deal’ is a total sham. The REAL topline spending level is $1.658 trillion—not $1.59 trillion. Our nation simply cannot afford the Swamp’s reckless spending habits,” Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), who serves on the House Appropriations Committee and is a member of the Freedom Caucus, tweeted Monday.


House passes government funding package in first step toward averting shutdown

quote:

The conservative House Freedom Caucus came out in opposition to the funding package on Tuesday, saying in a statement that the text released so far "punts on nearly every single Republican policy priority" while giving away GOP leverage.


quote:

First, several republican senators are America First, several fresh faces in congress are America First. Hell, Matt Gaetz ushered in the defeat of McCarthy and well, he's...uh, America First.


There have always been some America First type people around. This isn't indicative of some sort of sea change.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 11:10 pm to
read it again

Hey what do you know, you found an article that has a negative opinion on a bill. I tell ya, the evidence is palpable!
Look. it's significantly different than the omnibus bill passed in December and a step in the right direction. If you can't see progress there, then I don't know what to tell you.
Further, you have failed to comment on why your ire isn't on nevertrumpers. I find that odd.

Also, how old are you? I'm guessing late 40s-60s.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 11:15 pm
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

He's also a complete unknown and likely swampy trojan horse.
this is why we can't have mice things.

At some point you have to trust people.

I could make a better case for Vivek being america first moreso than trump.

Vivek sees WAY more of the issues clearly.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
8658 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 11:50 pm to
those heels up contest were won fair and square, by the strength of her back.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 11:54 pm to
Perhaps they can't think critically or need their hand held by some talking head to say it's ok? Who knows, but it is quite a terrible way to live without trust in others.
Posted by Oneforthemoney
New Iberia, La
Member since Dec 2013
1793 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:39 am to
He is a globalist backed by dem elites
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27935 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:56 am to
quote:

Trump won Iowa in 2016?

Dude your posting level has fallen into the abyss. What office does someone hold after winning the Iowa caucus? :JeopardyTheme:

Hint: Iowa is like one of 50 precincts. Winning it DOES NOT win 'a race' of any kind

Your analogy is like the team handing off the baton in 1st place, after the first leg of a 4x100 relay. They dont then get to sprint over to the podium, and step up to the gold medal platform. The race aint over

Viveks is
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
542 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:48 am to
This post was edited on 4/5/24 at 2:23 pm
Posted by mjfrog93
Member since Aug 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:41 am to
I think Vivek is acceptable given his takes and his pharma background, but he seems to me too much a firebrand similar to MTG. A bit caustic. I like what he's done but don't think he has the government level assurance people would want should they vote for Trump.

Here's my short list.

Military:
Mike Pompeo: (first in class at Westpoint). knows the Deep State very well and would know all the ins and outs of how to craft our foreign policy. Forget his negative comments on MAGA, it's a show.
Ezra Cohen Watnick: Son of a doctor and lawyer, and known to be extremely intelligent and a master of unconventional warfare. A younger version of Mike Pompeo
Elon Musk: number one contractor for government military, per comments by Kash Patel. Obviously a CEO type Trump would warm up to, given our psychological warfare and social media issues that are WW3.

Diversity:
Sorry I can't go the black route (not that there aren't some capable, I just don't see the experience for this round)
Tulsi Gabbard: Middle grounder, young female that met with Trump prior to his 2016 election. Defected as a democrat but like Vivek, a WEF future leader (perhaps not a good thing, and I believe Vivek disowned his name on the list).
Kristi Noem: Governor of SD, self-made person with a great reputation of how the COVID crisis was handled in her state. Beautiful and a 10X improvement over a Sarah Palin narrative.

Lawfare: Devin Nunes & Kash Patel. They both had a huge role in breaking down the phony Steele Dossier narratives. Devin has also the CEO of Truth Social to fit with the Trump business factor, and Kash is a better version of Vivek in that he has a firm grasp on law and lawfare.

That's my wishlist.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:50 am to
Interesting list. Its reasonings are in my opinion sophomoric but I appreciate your contribution to the thread.
Posted by mjfrog93
Member since Aug 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:55 am to
Sophomoric is probably appropriate. Let's see yours. I'm always open to ideas.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 4:16 am to
It’s a short list:
Vivek. Reasonings as stated above. For me, the answer is obvious. My only hope is Trump sees it the same way. We are growing to an untenable point in this nation’s history where very tough and seemingly drastic changes need to occur. For that, we need policies firm enough and people wise enough to fairly explain the whats and the whys so folks can understand. We need someone who will fight but also someone who is smart enough to see the deeds done.

Vivek has a plan for removing the department of education, the IRS, the CDC, reorganizing the FBI, cutting 75% of the federal workforce, etc. This will remove the centralized power structure in DC and bring it back to the people. It will crush the teachers union which only seek to poison the minds of our youth.

These are the types of ideas and plans that need implementation and all can be done via constitutional authority by the executive branch. Will there be a fight? You bet. Will it go to the Supreme Court? Most likely, but these plans need to happen to save this country.


Further, deporting the millions of illegal immigrants here in this country is paramount as well and Vivek and Trump have vowed to do so as well. That will not come without pain and it will take a leader who is strong enough to weather that storm as well.

This is not a 4 year battle, it’s a 12 year war and we will need a man like Vivek to carry the baton and finish what Trump has started. The policies are clear and Vivek is the only one I’ve seen who has clearly laid out not only the problem but also the viable solution.

The names you listed are fluff. Hell Pompeo was the CIA chief has since come to be caustic to America First ideals. That’s your Trojan horse.

My only hope is Trump sees it the same way and sadly from his track record, I’m not sure he will make this dire and important move. But if he does, it will signal an important step forward to righting the ship. Taking the gloves off and actually doing the heavy lifting needed to save this constitutional republic.

Do it not and I’m afraid it’s quite over for you and I.
Posted by mjfrog93
Member since Aug 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 4:34 am to
quote:

The names you listed are fluff. Hell Pompeo was the CIA chief has since come to be caustic to America First ideals. That’s your Trojan horse.


As I said before, Pompeo has said things on interviews that have absolved him from being a Trump guy. So has Bill Barr. But I've seen enough of their public comments to see a deeper meaning.

Contrast: Vivek, you're all-in on him. Okay.

quote:

In May 2023, Ramaswamy's campaign admitted that he had paid an editor to alter his Wikipedia biography before announcing his candidacy but denied that the payment for edits was politically motivated. The edits to the Wikipedia biography removed references to Ramaswamy's postgraduate fellowship from the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans, as well as his involvement with the Ohio COVID-19 Response Team. Paul and Daisy Soros are the elder brother and sister-in-law, respectively, of businessman and social activist George Soros, who has been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories among American conservatives and rightists. Ramaswamy's campaign denied attempting to "scrub" his Wikipedia page and argued the edits were revisions of "factual distortions."


I suppose we both can be accused of being sophomoric.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 4:52 am to
Not this tired attack again. Vivek has spoken at length about this over and over. I swear it’s like playing whack-a-mole. He took a scholarship. So what? Use critical thinking, perhaps more than one source, perhaps, especially in this case, you can seek Vivek’s own comments on the matter, not some cheeky little article you found. Do some damn due diligence and quit being led by the nose.
Posted by mjfrog93
Member since Aug 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 5:02 am to
Chill out bro. You seem to like Trump. So that's good. I'm not anti-Vivek. I just haven't seen enough. You should know by now anyone, pro-Trump is going to get eviscerated in what they stand for and where they come from. I'm only saying that Ramaswarmy, Barr and Pompeo have the same obstacles in the mind of the masses on why they can be trusted. You say my stance on the two latter makes is sophomoric. I say you have to prove it on your own favorite. Not complicated. It's early. If Trump picks your guy, great; it means he was vetted. If he doesn't don't throw a tantrum. We have a lot of good patriots in our corner, and I'm about as optimistic on that as I've ever been.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2390 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 5:12 am to
So you post meaningless attacks that take seconds to disprove... Pompeo would be a disaster and Barr, are you kidding me? It’s not early. We are past the primaries. This is make or break time. And again, it’s not just about this election it’s the next 12 years and you can’t even do the simplest of due diligence before you scramble to find someone else’s words to parrot as your own.

You are a mockingbird and representation of how difficult it really must be to run for office. Imagine having to go county to county and engage with the same yokels proffering the same questions offered by the same outlets as if they thought it themselves. It must be mind melting.

And if you haven’t seen enough, simply go and learn more. There’s hours and hours of interviews. There are books you can read. While you’re at it, check out Friedman and Hayek and Smith.
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 5:17 am
Posted by mjfrog93
Member since Aug 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 5:31 am to
I didn't attack you. Your response sounds like one of desperation. I'll say it again, chill out. My liberal brother does this, demanding I go read some doctrine from some dudes from 50 years ago. It's a tired logic.

I'm done, have a nice night.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram