Started By
Message

re: Very real chance Roe v Wade is overturned soon

Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:37 am to
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77205 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:37 am to
quote:

You mean the birth control republicans dont want insurance to pay for????


Not our problem. Try out some personal responsibility for a change.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:39 am to
and this is how you lose elections
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13551 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:40 am to
Not a chance in hell Roberts is doing this. Thankfully. It would be a miracle gift for the Dems and the next election would lead to a sweeping victory for them throughout the entire country.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77205 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:41 am to
Republicans need to get behind the legalization of weed and the push to ban abortions and watch the Left's heads explode.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20083 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:41 am to
The same Roberts that upheld Obamacare? Okay.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:


Not our problem. Try out some personal responsibility for a change.



I do find it interesting that republicans have no problems with insurance companies paying for erectile dysfunction medications yet want to refuse birth control.

Ok for guys to have coverage to have see but women can’t have coverage to prevent pregnancy.

Typical republican hypocrisy
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127357 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:

It's not getting overturned
I think it is one of the greatest moral evils we have ever inflicted upon this Nation. And it is not going to be overturned.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74127 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:41 am to
Memphis, you are creating a false dichotomy

There is nothing inconsistent with believing we have a right to our life, while also believing we have a right to our property and fruits of our toil.

Charity and help for the unfortunate does not require govt

Let’s take it a step forward. Is it ideologically inconsistent for me to oppose the murder of all children who are poor, while also opposing govt-provided welfare and social assistance?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43653 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Like it or not, overturning RvW would be the best thing to happen for the Democrats.

Might was well just let them keep the house and given the senate and White House too.

This is true.

Repealing R v W would be a disaster.

Now, what needs to happen is we need to quit funding planned parenthood with taxpayer dollars that end up in DNC campaign coffers. If we can do that then I’d be happy. frick planned parenthood. If the sloppy pussies wanna get reamed out going and coming fine .... it’s their bodies. I just don’t wanna pay for it with my tax dollars.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20083 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:43 am to
There are other ways to fight abortion than getting the gov't involved.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74127 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:44 am to
quote:


I do find it interesting that republicans have no problems with insurance companies paying for erectile dysfunction medications yet want to refuse birth control.



I think insurance companies should have a right to cover what they want and consumers a right to choose their plans accordingly.

Nobody forces a woman to be on a plan that does not cover birth control
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138689 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:48 am to
quote:

All of these heartbeat bills in southern and Midwest states are getting passed quick and in a hurry.
None will pass SCOTUS scrutiny.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7914 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:56 am to
quote:

When money > life, you should reevaluate your priorities


Holy hypocrisy Batman. You have the audacity to say this when the biggest argument for supporting Trump is the economy holy shite lol yall have finally devolved into only when the argument suits my agenda. And aren't even shy about doing it.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74127 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:59 am to
What point are you trying to make? That trump is a threat to life?
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21121 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

When money > life, you should reevaluate your priorities

Naw... raising unwanted children will 100% lead to more homicides. I could cite our murder (and other violent crime) rates before roe as a strong example. Unwanted kids are bad for the kids themselves and the rest of society. It's lose lose for all.

I wish people would be more responsible when procreating, but hope in 1 hand, shite in the other...
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

So you'll be ok when your taxes are raised to pay for additional social support?


You know what? Yes.
Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
46182 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

I do find it interesting that republicans have no problems with insurance companies paying for erectile dysfunction medications yet want to refuse birth control.

I think it’s more that they want the companies who are providing the lions share of the payments to decide what they want to cover.

This is NOT government decision. If the company wants it covered it gets covered, if not it won’t. If you have a private policy then you better research it and decide which coverage makes the beat sense for you.

There should be nothing mandated for coverage by the government
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

They want all these babies born but do t want to do a damn thing to help them afterward. No abortion but cut welfare and other child services too.


Strawman is straw.

The right is perfectly content caring for the indigent through CHARITABLE, not unconstitutional GOVERNMENTAL methods.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Lsujacket66


Hey look, here’s a thread from someone that has no problem losing elections to bat shite crazy communists just to force some whores and horny toads to be shitty parents.

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65670 posts
Posted on 5/12/19 at 12:22 pm to
quote:


It is a valid point and shows the inconsistency of the right.

They want all these babies born but do t want to do a damn thing to help them afterward.

No abortion but cut welfare and other child services too.


All of this is either an outright lie or complete stupidity. "The right" has only ever argued for cutting welfare to those who do not need it (we are destroying families by not doing this), and that charitable giving is more effective (it is).
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram