Started By
Message

re: U.S. votes AGAINST resolution banning death penalty for gays that have consensual sex

Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:17 am to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78358 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:17 am to
It's okay Toddy . Nobody cares who or where you bugger. The US is a safe space.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:18 am to
Russia meddling in US affairs bad.

US meddling in other countries affairs good?
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15356 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:20 am to
I think you should take some of your homosexual buddies to those countries and protest.

Let us know how that goes.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:21 am to
God y'all are clowns
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27818 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:21 am to
Why would anybody care?
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:21 am to
Well, we can see that Toddy has renewed his membership in the "Useful Idiots Union".

A little hint to people of ALL ideologies: Any time you see a headline that seems too "out there" to be believed, it probably is. In this case, it is clear that talking points have been passed out, because a simple Google search for headlines in the past week would have you believe that Toddy's version of this story is correct, and is the full story. The UN passed a resolution that condemned using the death penalty as a punishment for same sex relations. It does in fact do this, in item # 6, on page 4, of the actual resolution.

What none of these UIU members are telling you is that the resolution was a GENERAL resolution dealing with the death penalty, and included many other provisions, including:
quote:

Calls upon States that have not yet abolished the death penalty to ensure that it is not applied on the basis of discriminatory laws or as a result of discriminatory or arbitrary application of the law;


quote:

Urges States that have not yet abolished the death penalty to ensure that the death penalty is not applied against persons with mental or intellectual disabilities and persons below 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime, as well as pregnant women;


quote:

Also calls upon States to undertake further studies to identify the underlying factors that contribute to the substantial racial and ethnic bias in the application of the death penalty, where they exist, with a view to developing effective strategies aimed at eliminating such discriminatory practices

quote:

Calls upon States that have not yet abolished the death penalty to make available relevant information, disaggregated by gender, age, nationality and other applicable criteria, with regard to their use of the death penalty, inter alia, the charges, number of persons sentenced to death, the number of persons on death row, the number of executions carried out and the number of death sentences reversed, commuted on appeal or in which amnesty or pardon has been granted, as well as information on any scheduled execution, which can contribute to possible informed and transparent national and international debates, including on the obligations of States with regard to the use of the death penalty;


Now, I would argue that most of this is typical bureaucrat crap with little objective standard, i.e., it creates a regulatory burden where the interpretation of whether someone has met the requirements is left to someone with little defined criteria other than their own standards. Who defines "arbitrary"?

I really don't have a problem with anything the resolution is trying to accomplish. My objection is that it is really just a weapon for someone to enforce their own, subjective standards, without any real measure of accountability.

None of that matters to the issue at hand, though. The issue is that the Useful Idiots are out there parroting a dangerously simplistic platitude that (as it usually does) waters down and neuters the actual issue in the name of a pet cause. As a result, everybody misses the worthwhile argument (the death penalty as a whole) in favor of just trying to make it look like Trump hates figs.

Toddy: Your turn.
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 11:29 am
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Toddy


You are a moron. Clearly the US voted against this because as Trump has said, and as MILLIONS of Americans believe, the US should not be in the business of dictating morals to other countries. It really has nothing to do with gay, it has to do with a principle.

Of course, you being a liberal, no one expects you to understand a principle, but it's true just the same.

The UN's core mandate is not telling other countries how they should conduct their internal affairs.

Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72503 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Toddy's gone

he gets these totally biased stories from pink news and his LGBT groups on social media and tries to "gotcha" the board and when confronted with actual discussion, leaves. he will only come back when he's copied the responses/questions to him in this thread to those outlets and gotten their responses

Toddy is nothing more than a drone whose next original thought will be his first




yup
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27359 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:24 am to
Click bait......Toddy, you know and everyone else here knows that you are not going to be convicted for being gay.

Go smoke a pony baloney to your heart's content and butt ranch until it falls off in a public bathroom in a large city park
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:26 am to
The US does not need the UN passing laws about what counties do.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67680 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:29 am to
Then they have nothing to fear.

There is no 'sex' between same sexes.

No intercourse with the potential of mixing gametes occurs.

All that happens with gays is hedonistic massage involving sex organs. But not real sex.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139782 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:31 am to
Wait. Is op mad that he can still suck all the male appendages he wants?
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Ag Zwin



:golfclap:
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69251 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:47 am to
No response from toddy yet
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Give me one reasonable reason why they would vote against this and align themselves with some Muslim shitholes and china.


they no likey queers?

me no likey queers either!
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:49 am to
no message
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 12:04 pm
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:50 am to
There is absolutely no reason to use Toddy's sexual choices as a basis for attacking him. He's an idiot who happens to be gay, if he was straight, he'd still be an idiot.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:52 am to
quote:

There is absolutely no reason to use Toddy's sexual choices as a basis for attacking him. He's an idiot who happens to be gay, if he was straight, he'd still be an idiot.


Agreed. This is just like the Useful Idiot crap, but (honestly) more offensive to me. You actually do "hate figs"? Fine, but keep it out of the political discussion if you want me on your side.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:55 am to
quote:



Good to know that Trump thinks it's ok if I'm killed


If you're killed by Muslims, yes.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134845 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:57 am to
What else was in the resolution?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram