- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US Citizen Deported by ICE
Posted on 4/30/25 at 4:07 am to umrebel2009
Posted on 4/30/25 at 4:07 am to umrebel2009
quote:
WHY ISNT TRUMP SEPARATING FAMILIES???
I was told there would be family separation. Instead we are deporting whole families and letting them decide they would rather keep their kids then have them grow up orphans.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 5:13 am to roadGator
quote:
The illegal is not.
Is the use of dehumanizing language intentional or is it some subconscious coping mechanism?
Why not just say “The mother is not,” since the person you are referencing is the child’s mother? Calling an actual human “the illegal” is (as I’m sure you are aware) dehumanizing and unnecessary. It serves no purpose but to dehumanize this woman.
ETA plus “illegal” is an adjective, not a noun.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 5:16 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 5:34 am to 4cubbies
quote:
the use of dehumanizing language intentional or is it some subconscious coping mechanism?
I don’t believe many here would genuinely wish these people treated like the Jews in 1930s-40s Nazi Germany.
But it is a reference of accuracy because these people are here ILLEGALLY and some of them intentionally game the system (that we all get taxed to prop up).
Many of us simply want them to go back home. If they wish to become citizens of this country then go through the proper legal processes (like so many before have done).
I personally hold no genuine ill will and I realize these people are primarily pawns of the games that the politicians (that you would seem to support) have chosen to play upon this country.
My true ire is for those politicians and that political party.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 5:38 am to ned nederlander
Fake news. Citizen children are not deported. The mother has the option to take them or leave them with family.
The administration has addressed this particular media smear already
The administration has addressed this particular media smear already
Posted on 4/30/25 at 5:44 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Why not just say “The mother is not,” since the person you are referencing is the child’s mother? Calling an actual human “the illegal” is (as I’m sure you are aware) dehumanizing and unnecessary. It serves no purpose but to dehumanize this woman.
Because it serves as a much needed blunt reminder that the mother is, in fact, here illegally.
Because dems and the media consistently minimalize the situation and try to subconsciously convince people that the illegals have done absolutely nothing wrong (Ex. "The Maryland Father").
If you want people to stop "dehumanizing" people by calling them "the illegal", then stop championing criminals by using phrasing from the opposite end of the spectrum.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:02 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Calling an actual human “the illegal” is (as I’m sure you are aware) dehumanizing and unnecessary. It serves no purpose but to dehumanize this woman.
Once again, a liberal letting emotions get in the way
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:05 am to djsdawg
Liberals don’t like true descriptions. A person that came here without going through proper channels or over stays a work visa is by definition an illegal.
Same issue Dems have with hating calling someone a man or woman
Same issue Dems have with hating calling someone a man or woman
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:08 am to 4cubbies
Is the use of humanizing language intentional or is it some subconscious coping mechanism?
Why not just say “The criminal illegal alien is not,” since the person you are referencing is a criminal illegal alien? Calling a criminal illegal alien “the mother” is (as I’m sure you are aware) humanizing and unnecessary. It serves no purpose but to humanize this criminal illegal alien.
I mean, why say "terrorist" when you can say "astute religious scholar", am I right?
Why not just say “The criminal illegal alien is not,” since the person you are referencing is a criminal illegal alien? Calling a criminal illegal alien “the mother” is (as I’m sure you are aware) humanizing and unnecessary. It serves no purpose but to humanize this criminal illegal alien.
I mean, why say "terrorist" when you can say "astute religious scholar", am I right?
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 6:13 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:13 am to Smeg
For the liberals no human is illegal, well until you dump them in their backyards then those people aren’t humans anymore they are illegals and must be taken away.
They are humans as long as they are in other peoples backyards and liberals believe they are politically useful.
I’ll at least give it to cubbies that she might actually practice what she preaches and let them in her house, but she is an exception.
They are humans as long as they are in other peoples backyards and liberals believe they are politically useful.
I’ll at least give it to cubbies that she might actually practice what she preaches and let them in her house, but she is an exception.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:14 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Calling an actual human “the illegal” is (as I’m sure you are aware) dehumanizing and unnecessary.
The mother is the illegal in this situation, the child is not.
Facts…not feelings.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:17 am to djsdawg
It’s all they have to defend themselves, emotions because logic left them decades ago
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:23 am to ned nederlander
Was the mom supposed to abandon her kid?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:27 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
A person that came here without going through proper channels or over stays a work visa is by definition an illegal.
Marco Rubio went on air and called her illegal. DHS released a statement calling her illegal.
Both appear to be at least somewhat disingenuous to portray the mother in the worst possible light and wave away any concerns people have regarding her treatment.
The mother appears to have been detained at the US boarder, remained in Mexico during an asylum application as per Trump’s 45’s remain in Mexico policy, and was subsequently released into the US by ICE on the condition she periodically check in with ICE. She has checked in with ICE under these conditions for 4 years without incident.
If those facts are true, the US government released her into the US with conditions. She was meeting those conditions.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:27 am to ned nederlander
FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A 2 year old MUST have due process.....bullshite.
The mother has total control of where that child goes, and she should!
You DEMS have ZERO narrative, and it is getting worse.....
The daily meetings that produce the negative TRUMP news must be hilarious! DEMS need to get a life!
A 2 year old MUST have due process.....bullshite.
The mother has total control of where that child goes, and she should!
You DEMS have ZERO narrative, and it is getting worse.....
The daily meetings that produce the negative TRUMP news must be hilarious! DEMS need to get a life!
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:52 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
But it is a reference of accuracy because these people are here ILLEGALLY.
Then say “the mother who entered the country illegally.”
Do you refer to your coworkers, friends and family as “legals?”
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:53 am to ned nederlander
quote:
The mother appears to have been detained at the US boarder, remained in Mexico during an asylum application as per Trump’s 45’s remain in Mexico policy, and was subsequently released into the US by ICE on the condition she periodically check in with ICE. She has checked in with ICE under these conditions for 4 years without incident.
What? Per DHS she entered the US illegally 3 times and has had a final deportation order for 5 years. Where are you getting that she had a pending asylum application? She should have already been removed sometime in the last 5 years. And if she had, she wouldn't have a 2 year old US citizen daughter. It's almost like there is an agenda to slow playing these deportations...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:54 am to pankReb
quote:
Because it serves as a much needed blunt reminder that the mother is, in fact, here illegally.
That goal is easily accomplished by simply stating “the mother who entered the country illegally.”
quote:
If you want people to stop "dehumanizing" people by calling them "the illegal", then stop championing criminals by using phrasing from the opposite end of the spectrum.
You’re claiming that a person is championing something by referring to people as humans?
Bro….
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:55 am to Lightning
That'll kink the narrative slinky something fierce.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:56 am to djsdawg
quote:
Once again, a liberal letting emotions get in the way
What is emotional about what I posted?
It’s emotional to call a person something other than a person because you are mad (an emotion). Using language correctly isn’t emotional.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:59 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you refer to your coworkers, friends and family as “legals?”

This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 11:00 am
Popular
Back to top


0








