- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Unsealed FBI agent testimony in the documents case paints picture of Trump being set up
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:49 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:49 pm to RebelExpress38
Yeah those redactions are pretty bad for smiff
0
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:30 pm to TigerB8
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why did Jack Smith redact this in the first place, if it's so harmless and normal and standard operating procedure?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That doesn't answer my question.
One of his lawyers at the time stated they had sent documents requested back and they had "descriptions" of requests for other items. Which is bullshite they are all numbered.
For those, Trump's lawyer said we need specifics, the last thing we want is to send the wrong thing from their "description" and be charged with non compliance. Because of the delay.......they charged them with non compliance.
Its a mute point, they were declassified and there is no retro active DOD "super duper classified", nor can you take the presidents clearance after the fact and make it retroactive.
All nonsense just like the rest, but lets get past the fact and start to argue minutia.
I, like justice Thomas, want to know how a "special counsel" can be set up without congress voting on it? And with good reason, it can result in exactly what is happening a witch hunt by the person in office against an opponent. He is right to ask that question, very right.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:55 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
I, like justice Thomas, want to know how a "special counsel" can be set up without congress voting on it?
This has been litigated pretty extensively, IIRC. I vaguely remember getting an answer via Google the last time I saw this "clever" theory.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:57 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Why did Jack Smith redact this in the first place, if it's so harmless and normal and standard operating procedure?
Well it certainly piqued the interest of the judge didnt it
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:05 pm to trinidadtiger
When does this trial reconvene? The judge should throw out this case with prejudice.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:07 pm to deeprig9
SFP- legal expert- serious question-
What happens in a non-sensational trial when a prosecutor gets caught redacting exculpatory evidence?
What happens in a non-sensational trial when a prosecutor gets caught redacting exculpatory evidence?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:34 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Why did Jack Smith redact this in the first place, if it's so harmless and normal and standard operating procedure?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:36 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:and yet they did exactly that and Jack Smith tried to hide that from scrutiny. Maybe SFP can tell us why?
they were declassified and there is no retro active DOD "super duper classified", nor can you take the presidents clearance after the fact and make it retroactive.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:38 pm to deeprig9
quote:is the defendant someone SFP agrees with politically or not?
What happens in a non-sensational trial when a prosecutor gets caught redacting exculpatory evidence?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:42 pm to UncleFestersLegs
“Show me in the constitution where it specifically prohibits redactions by prosecutors.”
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:45 pm to TigerB8
Yet another reason the founders intended for presidents to have immunity.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't even understand the conspiracy theory. This CT requires that there was no opportunity for Trump to identify and return the documents.
I'm not an expert on this portion of the case, but wasn't he given opportunities to return the documents prior to the indictment?
The issue is the disparate treatment of this case. Presidents normally negotiate with the Archives for up to 2 years on which documents they keep and which they must return. There are examples from nearly every recent president where they’ve kept such documents and none have been prosecuted.
So to set up a trap where they ship the documents to him then A) Don’t process the negotiations in an equal and timely way and B) prosecute him for doing something that no previous president has been held criminally responsible for is the issue.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:55 pm to TigerB8
You have to be an on the knees cock gobbler for the Dems if you don’t know this. Biden gets caught doing the same thing but did not have Presidential clearance and nothing happens. Actually they come out and say he’s not competent to even know what he did was wrong.
Total fricking joke.
Total fricking joke.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:08 pm to deeprig9
quote:
The judge should throw out this case with prejudice.
No… she should do exactly what she is doing. Little by little… drip, drip, drip. Let Smith twist in the wind.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't even understand the conspiracy theory.
It's not a conspiracy theory, jackwad.
It's new evidence coming to light about the order of operations that's been conveniently left out of the prosecution's accounting of what happened when, and equally absent from any legacy media coverage of the case.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:13 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
The issue is the disparate treatment of this case.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:18 pm to GusMcRae
quote:
Let Smith twist in the wind.
Homeboy is no stranger to getting blanked by the Supremes.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:38 pm to VoxDawg
I usually ask Hank legal questions but he hasn't been around lately.
Do any of Jack's redactions violate Brady?
Do any of Jack's redactions violate Brady?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News