- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Unable to obtain Ivermectin
Posted on 9/12/21 at 10:38 pm to jimmy the leg
Posted on 9/12/21 at 10:38 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
How morally presumptuous of you.
I honestly don’t think that’s it.
quote:
fricktard.
I think that is.
0
Posted on 9/12/21 at 10:39 pm to Frac the world
quote:
Bought a bottle of those bad boys the other day any idea the dosage difference between these and human form?
It’s the exact same as what’s in the pharmacies. See my reply a couple of comments back to the other poster for dosage.
This post was edited on 9/12/21 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 9/12/21 at 10:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Take ivermectin if you like I’m not for stopping that but quit pretending “long term studies” are what’s holding you back on the vax. It’s politics pure and simple.
Good God you vaxholes are dense. Ivermectin has a 40 year safety profile better than Ibuprofin or Tylenol.
Covid VAX.. No clue what you might be dealing with in 2 to 5 years.
I really can't believe you don't understand this.
I choose to treat with a 40 year old med with excellent results when started early and no side effects... You go with the unproven one that seems to be showing poorer and poorer results over time and all the boosters. I won't judge.
Posted on 9/12/21 at 11:09 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
I really can't believe you don't understand this.
I’ve only been here a couple of years and I have no problem believing he doesn’t understand it.
Posted on 9/12/21 at 11:18 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
AstraZeneca has been granted protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine hopeful by most of the countries with which it has struck supply agreements, a senior executive told Reuters.
With 25 companies testing their vaccine candidates on humans and getting ready to immunise hundred millions of people once the products are shown to work, the question of who pays for any claims for damages in case of side effects has been a tricky point in supply negotiations.
The money quote:
quote:
“This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in ... four years the vaccine is showing side effects,” Ruud Dobber, a member of Astra’s senior executive team, told Reuters. “In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest,” he said, adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority.
But DavidtheGnome, rando internet genius, has a better understanding of the vaccine risk than the executives at the Pharma companies. That’s what DavidtheGnome wants us to believe.
LINK
Posted on 9/13/21 at 6:27 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
What’s the long term study on ivermectin treatment for Covid?
I know you're not that bright, because you spend most of your time on Reddit and then rush to post what you find on here. That means your life mission is craving anonymous attention. Just stay in your lane, because you don't have sufficient background or the appropriate research skills to back up your claims on ivermectin. But since you asked ...
Prior to CoVID, medical researchers had shown ivermectin to be:
1) Worthy of a Nobel prize.
2) Being designated as a "wonder drug", on the same level as penicillin and aspirin.
3) Capable of killing cancer cells in animal testing.
4) To prevent replication of a broad spectrum of DNA and RNA viruses.
5) A clinically useful anti-inflammatory agent.
Yet morons like you immediately fizxte on calling it a dewormer. Incredible. A drug as versatile as aspirin or penicillin is suddenly denigrated by the health profession, and you're not smart enough to question why? Here's your answer.
quote:
Interpretation: Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.
NIH published study
Based on a 40 year old drug, and 4 billion prescriptions, with only 28 reported adverse over that time span.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 6:45 am to ChexMix
quote:
can someone post a picture of what the ivermectin product packaging looks like ?
Posted on 9/13/21 at 6:47 am to League Champs
quote:
4 billion prescriptions, with only 28 reported adverse
And we are chastising people for taking it, when it is PROVEN
quote:
To prevent replication of a broad spectrum of DNA and RNA viruses.
This world is fricked.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 6:48 am to ChexMix
This post was edited on 9/13/21 at 7:07 am
Posted on 9/13/21 at 6:53 am to Taxing Authority
quote:A personal injury type needs actually do something right and sue hell out of these jackasses!
Amazon requires a diagnosis to prove it isn’t COVID related.
When did they get a license to practice medicine?
Posted on 9/13/21 at 5:29 pm to BobBoucher
Try Frontline. They will know where to get it. Mine came out of a pharmacy in Florida when I ordered from Frontline Doctors
Posted on 9/13/21 at 5:40 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
If it’s for prevention then it’s .2 X kg. I wouldn’t bother with that because it’s a waste of money. I’d just wait until I got COVID and follow the first directive.
Actually, I would say this would be the smarter way to go. And according to the FLCC or whatever it is, the dosing is not daily for prevention.
Is the prevention method not what India used versus the unavailable vacine?
Posted on 9/13/21 at 5:46 pm to FlexDawg
Posted on 9/13/21 at 5:50 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Actually, I would say this would be the smarter way to go. And according to the FLCC or whatever it is, the dosing is not daily for prevention.
Is the prevention method not what India used versus the unavailable vacine?
I believe taking it on day 1 and 3 of each week is for prevention, so yes it would be the better option if you’re not on a budget. For me, that would be 10 pills per week, so the whole bottle would last 5 weeks. Would be $30 every 5 weeks.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 8:40 pm to BobBoucher
www.pushhealth.com
www.flccc.net
Call compounding pharmacies around your state.
www.flccc.net
Call compounding pharmacies around your state.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 8:43 pm to HubbaBubba
Take your phone and record them turning you down.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 8:52 pm to TeeRoy
quote:
They told us they were going to be audited going forward and would be severely fined if they were filling Ivermectin prescriptions that were written for off label use.
That’s scary. Our government is making our medical decisions by monetary force. The writing is becoming clearer on the wall.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 9:52 pm to GallatinTiger
quote:
www.pushhealth.com
This is how I got the script for Iver along with 3 other prescriptions effective against COVID.
He wrote the Ivermectin script separately knowing there are challenges getting it filled.
Update: I found a local pharmacy that has 20 Iver tablets. I’m getting them.
that’s a day and a half. They compound, but are unable to even obtain the ingredients needed.
This post was edited on 9/13/21 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 9/13/21 at 10:34 pm to Jake88
What a bitch.
Posted on 9/13/21 at 10:37 pm to BobBoucher
What region of Missouri?
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News