- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UK Bans Social Media for Those Under 16
Posted on 6/15/26 at 9:48 am to Auburn1968
Posted on 6/15/26 at 9:48 am to Auburn1968
quote:
I'm sure the left will enforce the bans without bias.
And if you dare notice, YOU are the "fascist" that is in a cult.
See how this works?
0
Posted on 6/15/26 at 9:55 am to AGGIES
quote:
I’ve checked the numbers. By comparison, the traffic is minuscule.
I guess you are that naive.
So what's the threshold for the ban? User counts? Content?
Authoritarians love people like you.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:01 am to kilo
But muh bluesky…is the biggest load of horseshite. Congrats.
It’s the current version of “no new wars” and we all saw how that played out…
It’s the current version of “no new wars” and we all saw how that played out…
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:05 am to AlterEd
quote:
this ban doesn't apply to adults and all you'll have to do is prove you're of age with your digital ID in order to use social media.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:07 am to Aubie Spr96
I actually love it on paper. Not sure of the practicality of it, but I think it’s a good effort
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:07 am to Aubie Spr96
Limiting access to a site is easy. Granting access is the hard part. What information will adults have to provide to prove they are over 16?
Am I supposed to believe this is about protecting kids, rather than the UK setting up a nationwide system to identify and track adults and their online traffic patterns?
Am I supposed to believe this is about protecting kids, rather than the UK setting up a nationwide system to identify and track adults and their online traffic patterns?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:09 am to wdhalgren
It’s Chinese spyware. Wake up and smell the coffee
Cyberwarfare perpetrated using the algorithms is not a freedom of speech issue
It’s an age restriction, not a ban.
We have plenty of age restrictions in the that are based on common sense and for protecting children.
Cyberwarfare perpetrated using the algorithms is not a freedom of speech issue
It’s an age restriction, not a ban.
We have plenty of age restrictions in the that are based on common sense and for protecting children.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 10:16 am
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:14 am to Nurbis
quote:
the UK setting up a nationwide system to identify and track adults and their online traffic patterns?
It's just like Obama's crew listening in on the Trump transition team's conversations with foreign diplomats. They did it under the guise of keeping tabs on the foreigners. It was totally collateral damage that they just happened to be in conversations with American citizens who were illegally unmasked in internal communications in violation of federal surveillance laws.
Honest Injun.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:16 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
UK Bans Social Media for Those Under 16
Not exactly true.
They made a glaring exception for BlueSky. Think about that.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:17 am to VoxDawg
Just saw an accurate, but really sobering post:
The same guy that purposely covered up rape gangs against British children is now passing fascist measures to help "save their future".
These people are sick and evil.
The same guy that purposely covered up rape gangs against British children is now passing fascist measures to help "save their future".
These people are sick and evil.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:38 am to AGGIES
quote:
But muh bluesky…is the biggest load of horseshite. Congrats.
I didnt say anything like that you dishonest twat
YOU are the one bringing up user counts.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 10:58 am to AGGIES
quote:Then why not just ban bluesky?
But muh bluesky
Or “age restrict it? You don’t seem interested in doing that for some reason. Because it has low numbers? Who cares. If the other shite is dangerous for kids, why not this? You can’t say it.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 11:00 am
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:01 am to Aubie Spr96
Let's rephrase this
UK Bans X for those under 16. They can still be on Bluesky and TikTok
UK Bans X for those under 16. They can still be on Bluesky and TikTok
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:02 am to FLTech
Why is BlueSky and TickToc safe for kids but X isn’t?
It’s because those are left leaning platforms.
It’s because those are left leaning platforms.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:09 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:10 am to DustInTheWind
Bingo
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:15 am to AGGIES
quote:
t’s an age restriction, not a ban.
That requires uploading a government ID to access now in the UK.
You don't see the problem there?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:19 am to Centinel
quote:
You don't see the problem there?
You're talking to another one of these people that is not above acting like they are legitimately retarded on the internet in order to score points for the left. Except, they don't ever actually score any points. So their pretending to be retarded actually turns into legitimate retardation.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:37 am to Aubie Spr96
Why are y'all hating on Bluesky? Pedophiles still need access to kids, you bigots.
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:39 am to AlterEd
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News