- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/2/20 at 7:37 am to Wednesday
This appears to be maybe the beginning of the meme/copyright discussion that occurred in Europe.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 7:39 am to olemissfan26
Block me from sharing my thoughts on LSU’s offense next year or sharing some dumb meme? You make it sound like Twitter will come to my house shoot my dog and rape my wife.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 7:43 am to Knight of Old
quote:
Help me out here: do we know who exactly filed this complaint?
Doesn’t matter who did. What matters is they opted to remove it
Posted on 7/2/20 at 7:47 am to cajunangelle
Trump should hire a photographer to take the same photo, maybe with a flag standing in the background, and post the new photo. 
Posted on 7/2/20 at 7:59 am to TerryDawg03
I think that @jack has been paid to remove and copyright everything he can regarding Trump. The goal is to piss Trump off so he leaves twitter for Parler the echo chamber. Let's say Parler takes off they will buy off control of it. They are communists with way too much power.
I remember when posters here called those citing a deep State, nuts.
I remember when posters here called those citing a deep State, nuts.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:03 am to cajunangelle
That proves the message the image says is accurate.
Someone...got mad at that.
Someone...got mad at that.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:07 am to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Removed 230 from social media...
Hell no, we need less government regulation not more
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:07 am to cajunangelle
Twitter is a publisher not a platform and it should be classified as such
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:08 am to PhDoogan
spread this far and wide on twitter.


Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:09 am to SazeracAndBeer
no one forces anyone to us twitter
cancel it.
www.parler.com is good alternative.
..it becomes a great alternative once everyone uses it
cancel it.
www.parler.com is good alternative.
..it becomes a great alternative once everyone uses it
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:14 am to mrgreenpants
They want to piss off Trump so he leaves Twitter. Trump won't take the bait.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:17 am to SazeracAndBeer
quote:
Hell no, we need less government regulation not more
Removing crony protections is less regulation.
Where are you people getting this?
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:30 am to SazeracAndBeer
Removal of 230 protections REMOVES Gvt protection / regulation and lets private parties police themselves.
Stop regurgitating left wing propaganda. It’s the essence of less Gvt regulation
And I hope to God you’re not a lawyer.
Stop regurgitating left wing propaganda. It’s the essence of less Gvt regulation
And I hope to God you’re not a lawyer.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:32 am to cajunangelle
Ironically, it’s clear that the original image was meant to denigrate Trump.
The low key lighting, the menacing expression, the monochrome high contrast filtering all scream “villain”. Like the altered pic of OJ that Time magazine got in trouble for back in the day.
Photographer is just pissed that someone turned it into a positive message for Trump.
The low key lighting, the menacing expression, the monochrome high contrast filtering all scream “villain”. Like the altered pic of OJ that Time magazine got in trouble for back in the day.
Photographer is just pissed that someone turned it into a positive message for Trump.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:33 am to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
The photographer owns the copyright.
Trump owns his image. It would have been the bossest move of all boss moves to give the douchey soy boy or girl or person who doesn’t know what gender it is, photography credits.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:37 am to cajunangelle
The owner of a valuable asset does not want someone using HIS asset without compensating him.
The horror!
The horror!
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:38 am to AggieHank86
Do you think this will be evenly applied across Twitter?
No need to answer libertarian Hank.
No need to answer libertarian Hank.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:39 am to cajunangelle
Removal violates fair use doctrine
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:41 am to cajunangelle
quote:
This is getting ridiculous. Imagine how many times a day Hillary calls @Jack screaming.
Oh, and you know that miserable hag is just sitting there all day looking for stuff like this.
Popular
Back to top



1













