re: Turtle releases impeachment trial rules

quote:

---

So are the Republicans going to call Biden to testify the meaning of his video and his son's dealings in the Ukraine? Seems relevant to me.

---

Here is where I may depart with many on the board and on the right, but I think there is no need to call Hunter or Joe.

Whether or not Hunter or Joe did, in fact, do something wrong is not the relevant question. It is whether or not there was a reasonable basis that something fricky was going on for Trump's requested investigation.

The impeachment record already establishes, based on unanimous witness testimony, that at a minimal, there was conflict of interest or the appearance thereof on the part of the Bidens for which there is a legitimate basis to investigate.

If it comes down to witnesses to choose, the important ones for the pubs to focus on, IMO, are the WB (Ciaramella)(Soy-Eyes), Schiff's staff (Wall-Eyes), Atkinson (Snake-Eyes), and Schiff (Bug-Eyes).

quote:

---

If you stop and think about it, I think you will find that I am very seldom rude to anyone who was not rude to me first, and that I very seldom offer any personal insult to anyone who did not first offer one to me.

---

Still doesn’t make you a libertarian.

Agreed, but the Biden's subpoena threat was one upping the POS dirty dems with a clear message to bring it, you may not like the results...

quote:

---

and was shouted down when suggesting otherwise

---

That's because of your ignorance (again).

You need to read & study before writing anything.

BUT continuing to look stupid IS completely your prerogative.

I still don’t know why the president was impeached

Statement released by Cocaine Mitch to Schumer.

quote:

---

---

quote:

---

Schumer argues that the resolution could also prevent the Senate and the American people from learning the full scope of claims against the president. For example, it doesn't admit the House record into evidence at the trial, he said.

---

Democrats.

You fricking idiots. Your entire “House Record” is hearsay, opinion, and unsupported speculation by people with a demonstrated bias against the President & the people who voted for him. Example - that Professor Karlan Stanford idiot who Matt Gaetz freaking destroyed.

Literally nothing you morons placed “in the record” is actually admissible evidence in an actual trial. We tried to tell you that just bc it’s admissible on CNN, it’s not coming into evidence.

My God. Democrats are absolutely insufferable morons.

quote:

---

CNN, if they care about being a real news agency, shouldn’t be livid. They should just report the rules.

---

The same for Fox

quote:

---

"After reading his resolution, it's clear Senator McConnell is hell-bent on making it much more difficult to get witnesses and documents and intent on rushing the trial through," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement. "On something as important as impeachment, Senator McConnell's resolution is nothing short of a national disgrace."

---

elections have consequences...

The same for MSNBC, WAPO, NYT, LATimes, and on and on.

What’s your point because I don’t give a frick about fox. Stopped watching them 2 years ago.

But yeah, we can go tit for tat calling out msm liberal vs conservative slant but you’ll run out before me.