- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Turtle releases impeachment trial rules
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:44 pm
LINK
I haven't read it yet but the progs and CNN are livid about opening statements limit...
Probably much more.
I haven't read it yet but the progs and CNN are livid about opening statements limit...
Probably much more.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:47 pm to cajunangelle
CNN, if they care about being a real news agency, shouldn’t be livid. They should just report the rules.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:47 pm to cajunangelle
Still haven't read it but I hear Schumer broke into the news to give a spiel. So Turtle must have done well...
quote:
"After reading his resolution, it's clear Senator McConnell is hell-bent on making it much more difficult to get witnesses and documents and intent on rushing the trial through," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement. "On something as important as impeachment, Senator McConnell's resolution is nothing short of a national disgrace."
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:50 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
After reading his resolution, it's clear Senator McConnell is hell-bent on making it much more difficult to get witnesses and documents
So maybe I’m thinking about this wrong, but if the House is supposed to be the first to impeach then pass onto the senate, how can they add more witnesses and info?
Why didn’t the House use this info originally? How is that even legal? What’s to say the house would have voted the same way with this “new” content?
The exact info that was voted on in the House is what should be used
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:51 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I haven't read it yet but the progs and CNN are livid about opening statements limit...
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:52 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Why didn’t the House use this info originally? How is that even legal? What’s to say the house would have voted the same way with this “new” content?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:53 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
However, at least one major difference from the Clinton process has caught the eye of Democrats: The resolution cuts short the number of days each side can make arguments in the case. Rather than allow 24 hours of arguments that could extend over three days as was the case for Clinton, McConnell's resolution shortens the number of days to two. Democrats argue that would leave them arguing their case into the middle of the night and into the next morning, pushing the debate to the "dead of night," a Democratic aide working on the trial sai
I love this part. Dims mad because they can’t spread their Propaganda during Primetime.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:55 pm to cajunangelle
I was told in another thread that the Senate had already adopted its rules, through standing rules, and was shouted down when suggesting otherwise
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:56 pm to KingOrange
Mitch is riding raw on the beetches
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:57 pm to KingOrange
That is beautiful. Thanks for quoting that. I knew that Schumer wouldn't drag his arse to give a statement to his DNC CNN team for nothing.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:58 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Senator McConnell's resolution is nothing short of a national disgrace
Remind me how many "witnesses" the dims allowed the Republicans while in the house?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 6:59 pm to cajunangelle
Skip all the bullshite, vote for dismissal and get this crap over with.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:00 pm to cajunangelle
Schumer is such a fricking drama queen.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:00 pm to texashorn
quote:There is another set of general rules for ALL impeachments, adopted back in the 1980s. These rules are specific to this case and work as a sort of overlay to those rules..
I was told in another thread that the Senate had already adopted its rules, through standing rules, and was shouted down when suggesting otherwise
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:00 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
"On something as important as impeachment, Senator McConnell's resolution is nothing short of a national disgrace."
On something as important as impeachment, the behavior of House Democrats has been nothing short of unfathomable.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:02 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Democrats argue that would leave them arguing their case into the middle of the night and into the next morning, pushing the debate to the "dead of night,"
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:02 pm to Lsut81
You are spot on, Turtle even having a vote on witnesses and subpoenaed docs is gracious. It looks like (not quite sure yet) That barring any surprises Turtle has the votes to essentially dismiss with a yay or nay immediate vote after they hear from the Democrats lawyers and Trump's lawyers. This is another reason CNN/Schumer/The media/DNC are fuming.
Sounds like Turtle told the Romney's to hear them all out and barring no surprises he has the votes to dismiss. (Maybe Romney saw his poll numbers?)
Sounds like Turtle told the Romney's to hear them all out and barring no surprises he has the votes to dismiss. (Maybe Romney saw his poll numbers?)
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:02 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Still haven't read it but I hear Schumer broke into the news to give a spiel. So Turtle must have done well...
I have read it. No surprise Chuckie's upset; McConnell did VERY well. Time restraints for everything. No stalling, grandiose speeches. No witnesses unless agreed to by the senate, and have been deposed.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:03 pm to KingOrange
quote:
that would leave them arguing their case into the middle of the night
:GoldblumThereItIs.gif:
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News