re: Tucker talks to scientist who debunks climate change and origins of crude oil.

Great interview, thank you for posting this. Love the scientist

The term Fosil Fuel was created by Rockefeller. It was a term that sounded rare and price could be higher.

quote:

---

10 or 20 years ago I started hearing from friends in oil & gas that “fossil fuels” weren’t all from dead plants and animals. Several times I was told the earth just produces oil. I had my doubts. I’ve been a believer for several years now after listening to experts telling me they could re open a well or drill in the same spot 10 years later and suck as much oil out of the ground as the first go. Pretty wild how we were lied to. I have a couple old books from the 1940s and 1950s assuring the reader that natural gas would be depleted by about 1970 and crude oil would be gone by 1985.

---

I don’t believe that people that are open to the idea of abiotic hydrocarbons are against the idea of biotic sources of hydrocarbons. At the current state of the earth it can mean and probably does mean both. The question is, what is the rate of abiotic and biotic hydrocarbon formation? What kind of pressures, temperatures and inorganic compound mixtures are required for hydrocarbons to be created abioticlly? If abiotic hydrocarbon production is happening on earth it’s probably happening 10, 20, 50 miles below our feet.

I mean the reason abiotic hydrocarbon creation cannot be discounted is simply because we see many other celestial bodies in our solar system with small and very large concentrations of hydrocarbons. There is no organic life on these planets and moons.

quote:

---

I don’t believe that people that are open to the idea of abiotic hydrocarbons are against the idea of biotic sources of hydrocarbons.

---

I think most that understand abiotic also realize biotic as well. I don’t think anyone is arguing against biotic production of hydrocarbons. Hell when you eat plant matter the gut bacteria make methane that you excrete in your farts. That’s pretty real to most people.

quote:

---

debunks

---

You’re adorable.

quote:

---

quote:
Certainly possible. It's Hydrogen and Carbon atoms I would think they are plentiful throughout the universe.


That's the point, it's high pressure of the required elements that produces hydrocarbons. This scientist says most of the oil is under the mantle and it works it's way towards the surface.

---

HMMMMM......

almost like it was designed to operate that way.

(no message)

quote:

---

watch the vid

---

Stop acting like an annoying third grader and watch the video

quote:

---

The Sun theory has always made sense, why would we assume we are making the greatest impact on our climate, when a thermonuclear ball a thousand times larger than our planet can say “let’s burn 0.1% hotter” and flash cook our oceans.

---

Of course the "Sun theory" makes sense. If there were a dimmer switch connected to the sun you could directly control the climate here...

All kidding aside, the energy per unit area (i.e. flux) varies from the sun. Guess what? More energy from the sun hotter planet. Less energy, cooler planet. The good news is the surface of earth is covered in water and water is the great capacitor. In "weather" terminology water makes our planetary system temperate. Without water we would have very low low-temperatures and very high high-temperatures. It is the unique characteristics of water (compared to other atmospheric components) that allow it to absorb the sun's energy without a change in temperature (heat capacity) and it is the only constituent that goes though phase changes in our atmosphere which absorbs a lot of energy before a phase change (latent heat of fusion and evaporation).