
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump’s SEC Implements Communism; They’re Coming After Your Savings Accounts!!
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:53 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
This is so absurd that it seems like sarcasm, but based on your OP I have to come to the conclusion that you believe
I was thinking he was trolling and sap’s stupid arse bit the hook
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:15 pm to Mo Jeaux
Ok. So since I know jack shet about trading, investments, etc, I wanted to know why opening this area was bad.
From what my limited knowledge gives me understanding of... Is that with these types of investments you may not be able to get any of your money back.
Am I reading that right?
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/15/retail-access-for-private-markets/
From what my limited knowledge gives me understanding of... Is that with these types of investments you may not be able to get any of your money back.
Am I reading that right?
quote:
The problem is that, regardless of whether stable NAVs are a problem in traditional private funds, they could be a big problem for retail investors in non-traded funds that offer periodic liquidity. The reason is that retail investors might not fully grasp that stable NAVs offer no assurance that they will be able to cash out their investments at their reported valuations or even that they will be able to cash out at all. If investors rush to withdraw their money during a prolonged downturn, a fund manager has to either (1) sell assets at a loss to fund withdrawals or (2) sharply limit withdrawals. These options would either hand retail investors surprising losses or leave them cash poor at an inopportune moment.
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/15/retail-access-for-private-markets/
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
here you are cheerleading thievery. Shameful.
I'll turn myself in tomorrow morning.
I won't be calling you, though. I'm going to need a real lawyer, not someone who argues over how much time Daddy will get to spend with his kids.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:28 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
This could eventually give everyday investors much easier access to private equity/private companies—potentially a significant expansion of the investment universe, but with fewer protections and less transparency than public markets.
Interesting......
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:29 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
You don't understand the article you linked. Go read it again.
Oh, he understands it.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
…is a crock of shite and I’m shocked, SHOCKED, that you see no problem with this.
Are you a commie, now?

Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:22 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Oh, he understands it.

Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:32 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Mo Jeaux
I honestly did not think you had these two things in you.
1) a post with more than one sentence
2) a troll post.
Got really good bites, so yeah...keep it up.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:06 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
They’re coming after your savings accounts and 401(k)s. This cannot stand!!! Please rage with me over this blatant communism by the Trump administration!!!!
Oh for the love of Pete …. try to keep up. Congress approved access to consumer bank accounts, savings, and 401k’ several years ago …. under the Obama administration.
The time for outrage has passed, Rumpelstiltskin
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:15 am to UtahCajun
quote:
UtahCajun
You’re seem upset. I don’t even know who you are.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah that's what "they" say, but we really know these are lies
This is antiseptic
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:25 am to Mo Jeaux
I don't pretend to understand this completely, so I ask Grok. This in no way allows government access to folks savings or 401K.
quote:
Why this is not a seizure power
Nothing in the described amendments creates new authority for the government to freeze, take, or redirect individuals’ bank accounts, brokerage cash, retirement savings, or investment holdings. It is about:Product design and eligibility (who can buy which funds).
Adviser compensation rules.
Using already-regulated registered investment companies as the wrapper.
Private markets themselves have fewer public disclosures, can be hard to value, and are often illiquid. Critics (including some investor-advocacy groups) argue the main beneficiaries may be Wall Street fee structures rather than average investors, and that performance of some existing retail-access vehicles has lagged public markets after fees. Those are investment-risk and fee debates, not government-taking debates.
wealthmanagement.com
If you are worried about government access to accounts, that would involve other laws (tax, sanctions, criminal forfeiture, bank-resolution rules, etc.), not this SEC access-and-fees proposal. This plan is about expanding optional investment choices, with the usual private-market downsides of illiquidity, valuation difficulty, and layered fees.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:27 am to Mo Jeaux
It’s different when Trump does it
No matter the very real danger of cronyism on steroids and creating artificial markets
No matter the very real danger of cronyism on steroids and creating artificial markets
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:28 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:29 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
lake chuck fan
You do realize that he believes everything you just posted? And that he’s taking a contrarian stance to expose the blatant hypocrisy of this board.
Just a few days ago, Europe did the same exact thing, to be met with accusations of seizing bank accounts. All the Trump supporting seal clappers picked up the pitchforks. Now that Trump is doing it they’re saying the exact opposite.
And no one is talking about the real danger either way
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:30 am to theunknownknight
Over all their heads
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:33 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
I don't pretend to understand this completely, so I ask Grok. This in no way allows government access to folks savings or 401K.
Lies.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
Trump's people never said they weren't socialist types. They just have a thing about commies
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:39 am to Mo Jeaux
I dont believe you
If it were true, you'd actually be happy about it and would keep it quiet so we dont make a stink and throw a monkey wrench in the works.
So I know, without a doubt, and without even looking into it, that you're lying.
If it were true, you'd actually be happy about it and would keep it quiet so we dont make a stink and throw a monkey wrench in the works.
So I know, without a doubt, and without even looking into it, that you're lying.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:40 am to Mo Jeaux
What's going to happen: The dollar will be replaced by a stablecoin. That stablecoin will be tied to US treasuries. You will essentially own and spend U.S. Treasuries, but you will not receive any interest as you would if you bought a bond. That's how taxpayers will further fund the government.

Popular
Back to top


0










