- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP: "You're Going to find out"
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:47 pm to FLTech
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:47 pm to FLTech
... well look at it this way --- Jackson receives free tickets for her daughter to a Beyonce concert --- turns out that both Jay Z and Beyonce are in the Jeffery Epstein files ...
stuff like that
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:51 pm to BigPerm30
quote:
I’m so sick of “going to find out”.
I bet you said the same thing about the Epstein files. Which by the way, we are now seeing why the release is being handled the way it is.
Trust Trump!
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:15 pm to BeeFense5
It didn’t do that.
It literally just said he checked the wrong box. So now he just checks a different box, and its the same thing.
And its not “this place”, its your president who said it.
Try to keep up.
It literally just said he checked the wrong box. So now he just checks a different box, and its the same thing.
And its not “this place”, its your president who said it.
Try to keep up.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:51 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
So it's foreign influence to not allow "unlawful expansion of executive powers"
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:58 pm to FLTech
So now we care about improper influence on the Supreme Court.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:58 pm to BigPerm30
quote:
I’m so sick of “going to find out”. Let’s wait until after mid terms when you get impeached every.fricking.day.
Administration of free beer tomorrow
Luckily, most mature, responsible, tax paying adults have the intelligence to understand sometimes..... we can't always get EVERYTHING we want, when we want it.
Especially considering the impossibly enormous task of all Trump had to fa e off with in DC......., with a binch of weak arse bitches that is the GOP in Congress(which we the people elected).
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:59 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
So it's foreign influence to not allow unlawful expansion of executive powers?
Funny how the expansion of executive powers is unlawful now but was lawful under the previous three presidents.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:06 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
And blame Congress all you want but Trump supports Johnson and Thune.
Trump "supports" Thune only because he has to to get anything done. If Trump said something against Thune, you would whine that Trump was "shooting himself in the foot" or committing an "unforced error" as you people have parroted a thousand times before.
You will always find a reason to bitch.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:09 pm to AlterEd
It's the same thing as Aliens. Someone asked him about aliens and he said he didn't know what to believe and now the breaking news is that Trump wants to deflect from epstein
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:11 pm to FLTech
Trump should just ignore them outright. Full Andrew Jackson.
The judiciary has literally no fricking business setting trade policy or interference in how the executive may choose to use economics as a weapon.
The judiciary has literally no fricking business setting trade policy or interference in how the executive may choose to use economics as a weapon.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:14 pm to td01241
quote:
The judiciary has literally no fricking business setting trade policy
They didn't do this
quote:
or interference in how the executive may choose to use economics as a weapon.
Why have a Congress or Constitution, then? If you want no limits on the president.
Did you feel the same about Biden's vax mandate? Student loan forgiveness plan?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’re using domestic examples which is literally the judiciary’s entire purpose.
They should have no say on anything that is essentially foreign policy, and being used for multiple purposes including leverage to get what we want yes but also good things for our people like re shoring our ability to manufacture.
Again, you’re bringing up domestic things
They should have no say on anything that is essentially foreign policy, and being used for multiple purposes including leverage to get what we want yes but also good things for our people like re shoring our ability to manufacture.
Again, you’re bringing up domestic things
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:21 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
It’s the all talk administration. They string the simpletons along on everything.
Hilarious coming from A Massie fan. How many bills has Massie delivered in his tenure?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:21 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
What does Reddit have to do with this place losing all rationality?
Have the three dissenting Justices that traditionally are the most strict constitutionalists lost all rationality too?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:22 pm to AlterEd
Yep. If you're gonna accuse someone of being under the influence of a foreign power — more projecting on Trump's part, by the way — you better know what you're talking about.
Course, that's not Trump's bag.
Course, that's not Trump's bag.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:22 pm to BarnHater
We Do Not Deserve This Man!
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:23 pm to exiledhogfan
quote:
more projecting on Trump's part, by the way
Muh Russia?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:23 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
So it's foreign influence to not allow unlawful expansion of executive powers?
This place
If you were part of the Globalist Elite, would you like Trump's tariffs?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:23 pm to td01241
quote:
Trump should just ignore them outright. Full Andrew Jackson.
Good lord.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:24 pm to td01241
quote:
You’re using domestic examples which is literally the judiciary’s entire purpose.
Statutory power is statutory power. The interpretation of that statutory power doesn't change whether it deals with international or domestic policies. The executive is limited to the power granted to it by Congress via statute, and the actions of the executive. Pursuant to this power cannot exceed the limitations of those specific statutes.
quote:
They should have no say on anything that is essentially foreign policy,
Well, the Constitution specifies that this authority originates from Congress. So until you change the Constitution, what you want and what reality is are two different things
quote:
Again, you’re bringing up domestic things
Why would would presidents be limited to the statutory authority granted to them domestically but not otherwise? Ignoring the constitutional issue and just as a matter of the delegated authority granted to the president by Congress
If your stance is that the president has unlimited power and can ignore both the Constitution and the statutory authority given to him by Congress. Then why do we pretend that there are any limits to executive power?
Popular
Back to top


0







