- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:25 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Stormy Daniels broke her NDA and hired Michael Avenatti to defend her and go after Trump. Daniels and Avenatti have been in court and part of their argument concerns this $130k. They are trying to depose POTUS as part of this case. Michael Cohen, as the one guy who signed the NDA with Daniels, denied Trump knew anything about the payment. Trump, when asked, also said he knew nothing about the payment. Guiliani just blew their bull shite out of the water tonight...Trump's own fricking attorney just fricked up his client in another case.
So what does any of that have to do with Mueller?
Because they don't give a shite about the civil matter, they care about any criminal matters, which Rudy just made it nearly impossible to get Cohen for a campaign finance violation, which as I've explained to you stupid motherfrickers several times, if you read the memo naming Mueller as Special Counsel he could certainly investigate as part of his mandate.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:26 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Yeah. You were in the Army, dude. Proof positive you are far from the sharpest tool in the shed.
And now shitting on military men...you’re on a roll
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:26 pm to CheniereTiger108
quote:
There would have been NO RAID AND THEREFORE NO RECORDS SEIZED if not for Mueller referring him to SDNY.
Stormy Daniels lawsuit is not what prompted the raid that obtained the records, you ignorant frick.
MUELLER DID.
And this has what to do with anything? Put down the Busch Light and focus.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:26 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Reminder that Hastert was convicted of trying to hide hush money through structured payments to his victims....
I think he got popped for keeping cash withdrawals under 10k and lying to the FBI.
If Trump just wrote the check, I don’t think that would apply.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:27 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
And now shitting on military men...you’re on a roll
USAF vet. I can talk shite about the fricktards in the Army as often and as loudly as I want.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:27 pm to rumproast
I guess this earth shattering development will cause the unhindged msm to start a public trump hatred movement complete with fakenews, the rinos will now definitely be against him and maybe there will be a special counsel appointed to derail his presidency...
wait, isnt this already happening? who cares about this bullshite. she lost
lol
wait, isnt this already happening? who cares about this bullshite. she lost
lol
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:28 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
campaign finance violation
Oh the horror! A civil fine obtained through mediation!
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:29 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Reminder, Stormy Daniels wasn't a victim.
Never said she was. But if the reimbursements to Cohen are deemed structured payments in an attempt to hide them, it is potentially a crime.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:29 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
I think he got popped for keeping cash withdrawals under 10k and lying to the FBI.
If Trump just wrote the check, I don’t think that would apply.
Avenatti or whatever that douche's name is, along with some conservative dudes on Twitter, are saying RG hinted at possible structuring. I haven't seen the whole thing so I don't know exactly which part they're talking about.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:30 pm to mmmmmbeeer
What crime are you trying to claim was committed here? Why don’t you explain that in detail first since You’re certain they’ve got him now-?
Then we’ll explain why you’re wrong.
Then we’ll explain why you’re wrong.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:31 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
I don't care about a headline. I care about facts.
You are the example of what's wrong in this nation. Lack of critical thinking.
I have asked in 2 threads for pro socialists to lay the case out for the contradiction and have yet to see where any of you can.
What's there to fear? Surely you have the mental ability to do that.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:32 pm to Jjdoc
WebsterTake your argument up with Miriam Webster. They disagree with you. Read the examples. A statement need not be made by the same person to contradict a prior statement. If you still disagree..and are smarter than Webster, then I can only blame my ignorant professors and poor LSU education.
This post was edited on 5/3/18 at 7:22 am
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:32 pm to rumproast
frick off, concern troll
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:34 pm to Errerrerrwere
Concern troll? Just pointing out the bullshite you are about to be inundated with. You frick off dick.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:35 pm to rumproast
quote:
Trump said he was unaware of the payment by Cohen.
True
But later, he found out...and then reimbursed
quote:
Guliani's statement completely contradicts that.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:35 pm to rumproast
quote:
Read the examples. I statement need not be made by the same person to contradict a prior statement.
No one is arguing what a contradiction is. What we are arguing is the timeline, which is relevant here. Trump may not have originally known about the stormy payments. No one knows for sure except trump and Cohen
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:36 pm to The Spleen
quote:
But if the reimbursements to Cohen are deemed structured payments in an attempt to hide them, it is potentially a crime.
Not sure that’s right. At least not like Hastert.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:37 pm to IceTiger
quote:
True
But later, he found out...and then reimbursed
That’s how he will harmonize it, I’m sure. May depend on the timing.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 10:38 pm to The Pirate King
I will agree with that. If reimbursement was made after April 6, then he is good as far as his statement goes. But then the question will be why he waited until after April 6 to reimburse...and why after the 130k payment became an issue. Doesn't look good..but again...unless you are in the tank for the left, it doesn't matter....
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News