Started By
Message

re: Trump will be brought before a war crimes tribunal

Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:39 pm to
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23980 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

podcast link por favor?


Listen and ponder. As someone said, the Dems have something up their sleeves. And as another said, the government and military is full of Vindmans. It doesn't take much of an imagination to see where they could be going with this. But we can take comfort in what SFP said and that was They Won't.
Posted by newmexicotiger
Member since Sep 2017
4408 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

judged by Mandami


"IT'S MA'AM DAMI"

Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34212 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:09 pm to
Lulz
quote:

The ICC can generally exercise jurisdiction in cases where the accused is a national of a state party, the alleged crime took place on the territory of a state party, or a situation is referred to the Court by the United Nations Security Council. There are 125 states parties to the Rome Statute, which are represented in the court's governing body. Countries that are not party to the Rome Statute and do not recognise the court's jurisdiction include China, India, Russia, and the United States.

quote:

the alleged crime took place on the territory of a state party

Nope
quote:

Countries that are not party to the Rome Statute and do not recognise the court's jurisdiction include China, India, Russia, and the United States.

Not happening
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167057 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:23 pm to
They did and while I always considered Saxton on team establishment. He seems to have drawn a line. No offense to SDV or @JB but they seem to live in make believe land like the qtards thinking sessions is running tribunals for 10 years now.

Look at the trend of israel Qatar divisiveness. They just added in muh epstein to cement the divide. Everyone has a price.

MTG got hers with most likely a promised cabinet position. She was never MAGA and used q to get elected. She has made 30 million yet she still sold out=never MAGA
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 3:25 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167057 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:31 pm to
Oh they will. They raided. arrested.tried to kill and impeach Trump twice

As always SFPs logic is a fallacy.

They want MAGA DEAD.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23980 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

They want MAGA DEAD.


I'm assuming you watched the video. I only conveyed what they said and their concerns. You can tell by his expression, Buck knows they are going to come right back at him. And I have no doubt "they" will try to throw him in jail in his twilight years. I've live a long life. The country is "Different" now.

And we will just sit and watch it happen. I ain't gonna do anything.
Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
21455 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

It's not good enough for Dems to win elections. They want to destroy any opposition.


Which is why we should take a pragmatic approach, call "timeout" on our little Constitutional Republic project for a year or two, and purge all of them from the country.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167057 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:47 pm to
I agree with you. I said a few weeks ago they were brewing. Then when MAGA IS DEAD tried so hard to trend on X duhnt ta dah here they come.

They wont just let Trump retire. Since you have been watching this as long as me. What does your gut tell you about Vance? Pence 2.0 or no?
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 4:12 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37482 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:50 pm to
Such hyperbole, just for clicks.......
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3818 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:05 pm to
Is it because he is stopping the wars that fund them behind the scenes?

I bet that is really what it is.

That is why they impeached him the first time.
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
9422 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:07 pm to
Well, they are damn sure headed that way. MTG, Massie with the Epstein shite. Trump with the Indian(dot) love.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23696 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:08 pm to
Lmao!!!! Yeah, that will NEVER happen.
If the Marxist want to see what a real J6 looks like...... try this foolishness.
Posted by JRook
South Florida
Member since Jul 2020
260 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

let's hope. After 2026 Vance needs to display his individuality.



Vance is bought and paid for by South African, gay Peter Thiel who is on record as anti-democracy, but that pretty much is MAGA, right? Of course, throw in totally stoned all day Elon and they will weld the power. Enjoy!
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23980 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

They wont just let Trump retire. Since you have been watching this as long as me. What does your gut tell you about Vance? Pence 2.0 or no?

Pence is a has been. In my humble opinion, Vance has not seriously distinguished himself apart from Trump. I am not sure he is the heir apparent. Maybe. But regardless and for example, in the run up to 2028 Rubio will likely resign as SOS to put together a run. Vance will be hamstrung by being VP and unable to separate himself from Trump. Oh I guess George HW Bush did it. By 2028 the country will want the next type of GOP candidate. Being like Trump will not get it. I like Vance but his recent memeing shows unseriousness. He needs to get serious about a run and the electorate he needs. And I would vote for him. I expect numbers of Rs running for the presidency. Maybe six?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138741 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Where do we suppose this will be held?
The Hague .... despite other dismissals here
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23980 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

The Hague .... despite other dismissals here


No. The implication is a proceeding in the US. We are not a signatory to the ICC.

My bet is the democrats would come up with something right there in DC with Boasberg as the presiding judge.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476390 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

My bet is the democrats would come up with something right there in DC with Boasberg as the presiding judge.


If you're going to make a joke, do it like I did with NYC and Mandami
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89704 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

I know. It's a bitch living in a country with this constant turmoil. And if they win, they will do terrible things I predict. For them it is time to flush the opposition.



You guys have been predicting this for 10 years now.

You democrats will not win on your current platform of hate Trump and open borders.


Will you democrats be able to put forth an actual platform in 2028 without mentioning Trump? Doubtful.






Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7909 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

That's because they can't win elections unless they first destroy any opposition.


They can’t win elections without widespread cheating and fraud.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram