- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump: unfair for Iran to lack ballistic missiles if other countries have them
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:00 pm to AGGIES
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:00 pm to AGGIES
quote:
The real talk before was that the missiles were the reason for the war
No, it was not. Nuclear material was used as a reason post-bombing, but no one ever said Iran could not have ballistic missiles. They have had them for quite some time now.
Oh wait, did you think all ballistic missiles were of the nuclear variety?
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:02 pm to Timeoday
quote:
He said it and Macron reacted quickly. POTUS Trump knows the Europeans do not want the Iranians to have them. But we are not doing the bidding for the Europeans.
This is correct. It’s amazing to me how long we’ve seen and watched Trump work and people still don’t understand everything he says is meant to cause a SPECIFIC reaction. He never spits nonsense without reason for it. The fact that he makes it look that way is what makes him successful
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:02 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Same old trump.
It’s why nobody takes donald mctaco tits seriously.
Have you ever
1) been on the right side of anything
2) made anything resembling a point or valid argument
For the life of me, I do not think you ever have
This post was edited on 6/21/26 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:09 pm to UtahCajun
Nope. I did not think that.
But you are incorrect about the Trump admins’ stated views of Iran’s missile program.
Historical data points:
When Trump withdrew from the original Obama-era nuclear deal (the JCPOA), his primary criticism was that it failed to eliminate the threat of Iran's ballistic missile program.
On February 28, Trump took a hardline stance, declaring: "We're going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated."
In early March, Rubio reinforced this absolute goal, stating to reporters: "The objectives of this operation are to destroy their ballistic missile capability and make sure they can't rebuild it... That's the objective of the mission."
The Pentagon argued that military action was necessary because Iran's massive ballistic missile arsenal acted as a tactical shield to protect its covert nuclear ambitions.
But you are incorrect about the Trump admins’ stated views of Iran’s missile program.
Historical data points:
When Trump withdrew from the original Obama-era nuclear deal (the JCPOA), his primary criticism was that it failed to eliminate the threat of Iran's ballistic missile program.
On February 28, Trump took a hardline stance, declaring: "We're going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated."
In early March, Rubio reinforced this absolute goal, stating to reporters: "The objectives of this operation are to destroy their ballistic missile capability and make sure they can't rebuild it... That's the objective of the mission."
The Pentagon argued that military action was necessary because Iran's massive ballistic missile arsenal acted as a tactical shield to protect its covert nuclear ambitions.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:12 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
Bro went from I will annihilate your civilization, to you should have ballistic missiles in about 6 weeks.
Can’t wait for the “Art of the Deal” / 4-d chess cucks to defend this crap.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:18 pm to AGGIES
What would your whore Cameltoe Harris have said?
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:23 pm to AGGIES
This is only true if Iran is done being a world enemy. If they have new leadership moving forward that’s wants to join the first world, it makes sense that they are armed to defend themselves. If nothing has changed then they should be demilitarized.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:24 pm to idlewatcher
quote:Not really. Its just him. Bluster and cave. Why isnt DOGE doing anything now? Where is the wall? He's stuck to his reduction in letting people in, but are ICE raids still happening? Continuing resolutions with an ever growing deficit, cave. Of course this is better than Kamala, but still too soft.
Dude is losing his marbles
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:33 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
quote:
he's right.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:34 pm to AGGIES
if they want ICBMs, OK. Their choice. Nukes are different.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:14 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Trump: unfair for Iran to lack ballistic missiles if other countries have them
I'm sure that quickly got the attention of European leaders.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:34 pm to AGGIES
I believe they call it negotiation. Both sides makes reasoned concessions by taking the others perspective into account. Otherwise it would be called a dictum.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:37 pm to AGGIES
Trump is saying this to keep all the towel heads in line.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:40 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Isn't it also unfair for criminals to not have a few guns... if the police and other people have them?
What's your point? The criminals DO have guns.
Popular
Back to top

1









