- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:40 pm to Reagan80
quote:
Reagan80
You were the idiot that claimed Orange Bad abaondoned the ppl of Iran
You and deltatard
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:41 pm to bigjoe1
If Trump ends it with that regime still in power it will have been a failure and will absolutely hurt us in the long run.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:42 pm to LARancher1991
quote:
Their air force and navy were never a threat.
Then where did 11 of our reaper drones disappear to?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:43 pm to LARancher1991
quote:
Should have done it a lot sooner. And idk how many years. 8 months after we supposedly crippled their nuclear program we are right back over there. People like to talk about regime change and stuff, but this whole thing started again because they were starting up their nuclear program again.
So after 49 years, including decades of nuclear development known to the world, including 2 Dem admins in the last 15 years supporting and encouraging their development of their nuclear programs
This admin went in 8 months ago and crippled their nuclear programs under information they were weeks from having a working weapon
We continued talks with them and were informed that had enough material stored from the decades long program, even after the immediate crippling, to EVENTUALLY build 11 weapons and that we could go frick our selves diplomatically that they weren’t giving anything up that way we would have to take it militarily
We continued talks to negotiate for a few more months only to conclude that the worlds biggest sponsor of terror who was the material and is hell bent on creating a weapon isn’t negotiating in any plausible manner, while re starting work
And go in to take them out.
And you see this not as a continuation of the same set of circumstances…….
You were ok with doing nothing for 49 years but when we didn’t get the job done in one bombing run over 4 hours you’re frustrated because we are “back over there 8 months later.
Why do I have the feeling if we would have wiped out their navy and leadership 8 months ago you would have been bitching about mission overreach.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:What do you mean?
We didn't have the golden opportunity that the Russian invasion of 2022 presented us a lot sooner
I only ask because I’ve been thinkin and was leaning towards “well shite, it kind of was a good opportunity to do this IF it was to be done.” Seeing as Russia is busy and we just did Venezuela(I have no idea what their military capabilities are) and hit Iran so hard so quickly.
The China/Russia/Iran/Venezuela team, 2 days into this recent bombing, didn’t seem all that well positioned to do a whole lot unless China decided they should go HAM.
Was the timing of all of this pretty well planned?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:45 pm to LARancher1991
quote:
People like to talk about regime change and stuff, but this whole thing started again because they were starting up their nuclear program again.
No, this (meaning our direct involvement) all started when Donald — or maybe an un-chaperoned "staffer" — went on social media and made that stupid post about us saving the Iranian people, drawing a red line by demanding that the regime not start killing protesters.
At that point we had been told that their nuclear capability had been completely and utterly destroyed and was set back "years". The renewed focus on nuclear came when the mission needed to sold to the people.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:45 pm to bigjoe1
quote:yes please
that he is “thinking about taking it over.”
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:46 pm to TDsngumbo
But you do have TDS in your name!
I keeeed
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You're a liar. When we bombed Iran several months ago you were one of the idiots who claimed we would have boots on the ground and be locked into an ongoing war.
Obtw, you still haven't given Trump credit for closing down the southern border, you 2-bit phony.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:48 pm to PastorJ
Plus if we don’t get a global recession out of it it’s a failure
But I see the talking points memo is now shifting back to regime change.
But I see the talking points memo is now shifting back to regime change.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I've always posited the option that we do this and nothing changes long-term and the regime remains in place.
Nobody on these boards posits as good as you, Slow.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:50 pm to bigjoe1
He should have learned a lesson from MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. 
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:50 pm to SDVTiger
He did abandon them. There will be no regime change.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:52 pm to PastorJ
quote:
If Trump ends it with that regime still in power it will have been a failure and will absolutely hurt us in the long run.
From a geopolitical perspective it basically hands the bulk of international influence of Iran over to China & Russia
Posted on 3/9/26 at 4:58 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
What does this even mean?
It’s pretty obvious what he means. Can you read?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 5:20 pm to Reagan80
quote:
He did abandon them
What an idiot
quote:
There will be no regime change.
Just like you said that wouldnt attack Iran and abandoned them
Clown poster
Posted on 3/9/26 at 5:22 pm to KCT
quote:
When we bombed Iran several months ago you were one of the idiots who claimed we would have boots on the ground and be locked into an ongoing war.
Link?
I said if we didn't have boots on the ground it would not fix anything long term and we would be back.
Are we back fighting Iran? Yes
I was right (again)
Popular
Back to top


1









