- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/22/23 at 1:40 pm to RammerJammer91
Look, more anti-Republican propoganda.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 1:58 pm to RammerJammer91
The tweet you referenced supports Trump's statement, no?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:04 pm to RammerJammer91
Being loyal to Trump gives no loyalty in return.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Anyone that reads the transcript of trumps call and sees anything nefarious in it is crooked
Anyone who disagreed with your opinion is "crooked"? We can't just disagree? A candidate for any political office should not be placing an ex parte phone call to the SOS asking him to reverse the certified results of a completed election. Particularly based on facts the candidate has been told are false. And the POTUS has no business interfering in a State election under any circumstances.
That phone call alone may not have been criminal, but it was certainly "nefarious".
quote:
The Georgia case is the weakest of them all.
Curious why you think that? I think they are all pretty weak, but I think the GA case is at least stronger than the DOJ case in DC.
If Fani Willis can survive the new DA review board and push the trial forward before Trump gets re-elected, I think there's a chance he will plea to something in the GA case.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:21 pm to RammerJammer91
“Lawyers and representatives “
Representatives = Powell
Representatives = Powell
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:24 pm to RammerJammer91
Was she enrolled on his behalf?
Did she make an appearance for him?
There either was, or was not, an attorney-client relationship.
The fact he is saying there was not means that he could not prohibit her from testifying about any communications they may have had.
This is not the "gotcha" you think it is.
Did she make an appearance for him?
There either was, or was not, an attorney-client relationship.
The fact he is saying there was not means that he could not prohibit her from testifying about any communications they may have had.
This is not the "gotcha" you think it is.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:38 pm to RammerJammer91
I very clearly remember this subject after the election. As I recall there was both criticism and confusion surrounding this. In fact there seemed to be multiple challenges from various groups that kept getting shot down but they were seen as Trump losses non the less. One of the biggest criticisms he received was due to how few official legal challenges he filed despite claims of election fraud and irregularities. She and that other goofball were never legal representatives of Trump himself.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:00 pm to Damone
quote:
Literally the worst hirer and judge of talent ever
You should see Sheila Jackson Lee's picks
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:09 pm to BBONDS25
Dude he's right though here. Trump either allied himself with or hired Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and Michael Flynn just to name a few. All of these people he's now either feuding with, or they are under indictment for serious crimes. Give it up. The guy's a terrible leader.
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:44 pm to RammerJammer91
-Banned bump stocks
-Chastised Massie for criticism of the Covid relief bill
-Praised Fauci
-Continues to praise Covid vaccines
-Chastised Massie for criticism of the Covid relief bill
-Praised Fauci
-Continues to praise Covid vaccines
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:46 pm to RammerJammer91
You have convinced me to vote for Ron in 2024 
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:57 pm to Dday63
quote:
Curious why you think that? I think they are all pretty weak, but I think the GA case is at least stronger than the DOJ case in DC.
Because if you read the transcript of the call it is clear that trumps thinks there are fraudulent votes and he asks the SOS to find out which ones are fraudulent. There is absolutely nothing illegal about that.
Also, unless trump signed certifying “fake electors” there is nothing there. And he didn’t. The conspiracy charge is flimsy unless you can prove he hatched and helped implement that plan. That is IF they can prove that what occurred was actually illegal under the state law. It is a very very flimsy case and clearly politically driven. Which I why it isn’t just a disagreement and it is a crooked politician using their power to prosecute a political adversary.
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:02 pm to BBONDS25
Bro, you’re exactly right, but that plays no role for some folks all caught up in this hysteria. But they are a minority within a minority, so ultimately they don’t mean a thing at all, yes, even as loud as they seem.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:18 pm to BBONDS25
I already said that I disagree with you about the phone call. It might not be criminal, but it was highly inappropriate. Just to finish your synopsis, the SOS tild him he had already looked into the claims and Trump wasn't satisfied with that answer, and tried to convince him to decertify the election.
You don't think they can prove that Trump approved of a plan hatched by Eastman, Cheseboro, and Giuliani? I don't think that will be difficult at all.
The fake elector slate is clearly fraudulent, but it probably wouldn't be illegal on its own without the broader plan of using the fraudulent documents to delay the electoral vote count. That is ultimately the conspiracy and the goal of the RICO allegations.
You don't think they can prove that Trump approved of a plan hatched by Eastman, Cheseboro, and Giuliani? I don't think that will be difficult at all.
The fake elector slate is clearly fraudulent, but it probably wouldn't be illegal on its own without the broader plan of using the fraudulent documents to delay the electoral vote count. That is ultimately the conspiracy and the goal of the RICO allegations.
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 10/22/23 at 7:00 pm to Rule 303
quote:
The guy's a terrible leader.
Yes, he is.
“A Team” turnover in the Trump administration
How Does Trump's Turnover Compare?
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 10/22/23 at 7:02 pm to Cuz413
quote:
-Banned bump stocks
-Chastised Massie for criticism of the Covid relief bill
-Praised Fauci
-Continues to praise Covid vaccines
Lowered taxes
Didn't start new wars
That is all I care about.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 7:03 pm to Dday63
quote:
but it was highly inappropriate.
Why? If he believes there were thousands of fraudulent votes in a swing state, why would asking the SOS to do his job be inappropriate?
quote:
The fake elector slate is clearly fraudulent, but it probably wouldn't be illegal on its own without the broader plan of using the fraudulent documents to delay the electoral vote count.
Based upon which STATE law?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 9:23 pm to RammerJammer91
He’s probably right. I’m sure she wasn’t on his payroll and even if she was.. he wouldn’t have paid her
Posted on 10/22/23 at 9:24 pm to RammerJammer91
That tweet doesn't say she's his attorney.
Page 5 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News