0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/8/26 at 5:18 pm to Timeoday
correct me if i'm missing something, but if you reversed the order of the states from blue to red, wouldn't it appear as the same scary, just with the dems originally doing better, only to be overtaken by the gop?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 5:22 pm to BoarEd
Is he getting this from Grok?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:24 pm to Placekicker
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
peaking as a computer scientist... Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely. This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4. At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials. Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:26 pm to BoarEd
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:11 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:15 pm to BoarEd
I refuse to send a single second on this BS ever again
I spent way too much energy following all the 2020 post election issues (which it was an F’ed up election). Only
To see nothing done about it, and not going to go down that rabbit hole again.
Either do something or shut up about it
I spent way too much energy following all the 2020 post election issues (which it was an F’ed up election). Only
To see nothing done about it, and not going to go down that rabbit hole again.
Either do something or shut up about it
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:18 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
I refuse to send a single second
How many seconds did it take for you to compose this wholly unconstructive post?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:22 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:23 pm to BoarEd
I understand where he’s coming from- we all want to see the RECEIPTS- we are ready!
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:36 pm to Spocks Brain
quote:
understand where he’s coming from- we all want to see the RECEIPTS- we are ready!
Oh, I understand it too. It just always tickles me to see people post in threads only to say they aren't posting in threads, ya know? It's like they don't even realize they're doing the exact inverse of exactly what it is they're complaining about.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:38 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It's not going to hold up this time.
So all those other times they got away with it. But this time they went too far! This time the Republicans were ready for them! They walked into a trap!
Trump is gonna arrest them all and fly them out to Guantanamo! Military tribunals incoming! Trump 2028!!
I mean you don't even believe that anyone even believes this fever dream LARP fantasy stuff.
It's been 6 years. Let it go.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:41 pm to No Colors
I will say them presenting the 2020 data overlayed on the 2026 data would be the icing on the cake and prove both instances. Maybe that’s why they held off presenting 2020’s because they wanted them to make the same damn mistake in 2026?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:41 pm to BoarEd
quote:
When the same frickin' pattern shows up in the numbers across every state that went blue, that is not organic, it is fraud.
When Reagan nearly swept the electoral votes in 1984 his gains were in every single state. So that was ipso facto fraud?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:44 pm to Penrod
40 years ago Moron?
Before Al Gore invented the internet?
Much different times we are in- get your head out of your arse
Before Al Gore invented the internet?
Much different times we are in- get your head out of your arse
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:47 pm to Spocks Brain
quote:
I will say them presenting the 2020 data overlayed on the 2026 data would be the icing on the cake and prove both instances. Maybe that’s why they held off presenting 2020’s because they wanted them to make the same damn mistake in 2026?
Holy shite
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:48 pm to BoarEd
Jesus, this crybaby cheating claim is becoming even more pathetic.
Patterns can occur naturally without manipulation. Anyone who’s worked with statistics and other data knows this to be true. It’s not particularly odd that you would find similar patterns in different states. In fact, such patterns may reinforce validity and reliability…
Patterns can occur naturally without manipulation. Anyone who’s worked with statistics and other data knows this to be true. It’s not particularly odd that you would find similar patterns in different states. In fact, such patterns may reinforce validity and reliability…
Posted on 11/8/26 at 7:49 pm to BoarEd
quote:
it is fraud.
It's fraud that We The People have failed to eradicate, so, it will continue.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News