Started By
Message

re: Trump says that federal workers who don't want to work in the office will be fired

Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:24 am to
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:24 am to
My wife manages a completely remote work force that supports government agencies…she would love to hire some federal workers who are good at their jobs. Probably had oversight duties anyway…
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
2885 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:40 am to
quote:

My answer is that if you are an adequate manager you can manage folks regardless of your location. Believe me, I do it every day.


Agree that’s the case if you have seasoned employees. Managing/training new hires can be a challenge.

One could also argue that many federal employees are not as motivated as their private industry counterparts.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 7:42 am
Posted by Sizzle_DAWG
Sanford Stadium
Member since Jan 2024
1723 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:47 am to
Not to mention all those assholes out driving around and creating traffic jams at 2PM while us truck drivers are actually on the roads doing work.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26924 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Agree that’s the case if you have seasoned employees.


He and I were discussing problem employees, and under no circumstances is it the case that managing a lazy employee is just as easy to do when they're working from home. That's especially true when you've essentially taken firing them off the table.

This is clown world shite.
Posted by El Segundo Guy
1-866-DHS-2-ICE
Member since Aug 2014
11380 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 7:58 am to
It is ridiculous.

If you're overseeing a remote workforce, you aren't leading and managing. You are collecting data and disseminating information.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26924 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

If you're overseeing a remote workforce, you aren't leading and managing.


I might split that in half depending on the job. You can manage remotely but you can't lead. And I could see where the decreased efficiency might be offset by commercial real estate costs, so if it makes monetary sense I see why a private business might do it. My son works for a guy who's made a fortune in software/web development and his team is scattered all over the country.

But we were specifically talking about problem federal employees and he's STILL trying to claim there's no difference managing them remotely vs in the office. That's laughable bullshite for any employee, but it's particularly absurd for one that's nearly impossible to fire.
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
8560 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Try the VA... They are a real joy...


VA needs to be scrapped and put us all on TRICARE. We can go pick our own doctors.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 8:13 am
Posted by El Segundo Guy
1-866-DHS-2-ICE
Member since Aug 2014
11380 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:19 am to
I have both Tricare Prime and the VA. I'm in BFE, so believe it or not, the VA is more useful than Tricare because my Tricare PCM is in Plano or Frisco which is over an hour and a half away.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 8:23 am
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19386 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:53 am to
quote:

VA needs to be scrapped

This will not happen. The narrative would be you don't support veterans. A political bomb for Republicans.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19386 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

A second scenario is that the employee DOES NOT have a duty location in a federal office space so they 100% remote work from home.


The home office IS the duty location on the paperwork if I had to guess. So when you tell people they have to come in then come into where?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10543 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

No I don't think you do


Then tell me.

Everybody who "works" from home claims it's no different than working in the office. But every one of y'all would quit rather than go back, just like I said.

So why?

There must be some difference or you wouldn't be so militant about it.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19386 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Everybody who "works" from home claims it's no different than working in the office. But every one of y'all would quit rather than go back, just like I said.

So why?

There must be some difference or you wouldn't be so militant about it.

I think people are going to be surprised by how many people don't quit.

If the scenario is to move offices out of DC that won't happen overnight. If they quit what else are they going to do? Some will work for contractors that will allow them to stay in DC but most won't be hired. A lot will just bide their time.

The job market isn't strong enough for mass quitting.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10543 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Managing/training new hires can be a challenge.


Not to mention coaching employees who are performing marginally.

There are too many things you can't do effectively when people are not in the same space that affect the entire team.

And that's the thing. The WFHers are always focusing on their individual production. But the company is made up of teams, not individuals.

Lower functioning employees can learn a lot from high functioning employees and managers...if they are in the same space. I would have new or under-functioning employees shadow my top producers on a regular basis.

Just telling the A employee, "Tell employee B what you do and how you do it to be so successful" isn't nearly as productive b/c there are so many things that A does unconsciously that /she doesn't think to tell B.

Not to mention, those of you who claim that it's just as easy to monitor an employee's production out of the office may have special circumstances, but I didn't find that to be the case at all. My experience is that it took so much longer to monitor their output when they "worked" from home (never had a single employee whose production at home was as good as it was in the office) that I might as well have just done the job myself.

I suppose that is industry/job specific, but it's definitely not always the case either way.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:14 am to
quote:

But every one of y'all would quit rather than go back


Lol.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10543 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I think people are going to be surprised by how many people don't quit.


We'll see.

I think most of these federal employees literally don't do anything, or very little. So what will happen if they don't quit is that it's going to be quickly revealed that they don't have anything to do anyway.

I don't know what will happen then. But however it plays out I don't think they'll get to keep their "jobs."
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10543 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Lol.


Is that not true?

They all act like it is.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23057 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 9:32 am to
This is silly. If they fired people for not wanting to be at the office, I’d have been fired from every office job I’ve had
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36393 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:12 am to
quote:

But we were specifically talking about problem federal employees and he's STILL trying to claim there's no difference managing them remotely vs in the office. That's laughable bullshite for any employee, but it's particularly absurd for one that's nearly impossible to fire.

I'm looking at this from a macro view and you're looking at this from a single "problem" federal worker view. If you have remote work your pool of available employees that can/will take the job is much larger and therefore more talented than just choosing to hire someone who is either located near the site or is willing to move there. The increase in talent can and should offset any lack of efficiency that you believe there would be from working from home.

Do you not agree that there are employees who show up to work in an office and perform inefficiently? It happens everywhere, the thought that someone will perform just because they are forced into an office is absurd, especially if it's difficult to fire them.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8210 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:14 am to
Well some of us are working and work well from home and can't very well go back into the office because our office space(s) were turned into a data center. So, I don't think he's talking about all of us who work from home.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36393 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Then tell me.

Everybody who "works" from home claims it's no different than working in the office. But every one of y'all would quit rather than go back, just like I said.

So why?

There must be some difference or you wouldn't be so militant about it.

Well, I have several clients spread across the country from California to Rhode Island, so which location would you like me to report to? Do I go to a different location each day? If I'm in California, can I not respond to a client in Rhode Island that day?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram